Posts by yehor@mastodon.glitchy.social
 (DIR) Post #B4aBoZzrUZfkubjeIS by yehor@mastodon.glitchy.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       "ZFS with a striped configuration can be more space-efficient compared to other setups like RAIDZ, as it does not require additional space for parity. However, the actual usable space will depend on the number of disks and the specific configuration used."With this in mind, I started to migrate data from striped #zpool to #Raidz1 There was around 10TB of data to move. But after moving all that data, it took around 20TB on a two-drive raidz1. Some #BlackMagicFuckery #zfs #nas #homelab
       
 (DIR) Post #B4aBoaVPbGuSUSUqTQ by yehor@mastodon.glitchy.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @DrHyde yeah, that was a surprise for me as well. But you have no redundancy with two drives.
       
 (DIR) Post #B4aBoasoCHcnf1RWwS by yehor@mastodon.glitchy.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @DrHyde hm.... I'm not sure. Maybe this is the reason why my 10 TB of data took 20 TB on the raidz1?
       
 (DIR) Post #B4aBob35a3qeAuFjxw by yehor@mastodon.glitchy.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Striped poll consists of two drives as well. At the end, I should have #Raidz1 poll with 4 drives. Finally, having the same size.#homelab #zfs #zpool #nas
       
 (DIR) Post #B4aC7xXOBz6XQNesnQ by yehor@mastodon.glitchy.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mwl  I'm sure. I also was sure there is no redundancy on a two-drive raidz1 until @DrHyde's comment ))Here is the output. It is in the process of adding the third drive.
       
 (DIR) Post #B9pV9Ggdf7LJWBgRvc by yehor@mastodon.glitchy.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @lardmotel it was really great, but a single brain fuck is enough. I don’t think I could handle it twice  :blobcatdrool: