Posts by virtulis@loud.computer
 (DIR) Post #B4EqMTMYNxVWs6wmGG by virtulis@loud.computer
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @azonenberg what if Technologic + actual "AI voice" from our boring dystopia
       
 (DIR) Post #B5f53wtiwnfUC4YqUy by virtulis@loud.computer
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @thephd IR Baboon
       
 (DIR) Post #B8Rks4HIXGsiRuVLxw by virtulis@loud.computer
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @ariadne the one time i explored that the exposed functionality was absolute dogshit seemingly thrown together to proudly proclaim they have it. I can't imagine why anything that doesn't already have a proper API have a useful MCP.Then again, I wouldn't have imagined devs writing docs for LLMs but not humans, so I'm probably wrong.https://loud.computer/@virtulis/116380277480083437RT: https://loud.computer/users/virtulis/statuses/116380277480083437
       
 (DIR) Post #B8fvz4TiBPIXzx3IQq by virtulis@loud.computer
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @ariadne in a local context it's probably a "best effort" at preventing very basic attacks or accidents, or an extra layer of cheese in case more specific protections fail.In a service context it's "not a production environment". Likely less secure because of lower importance.In llm bullshit context it's "do not be insecure" prefixed to unsanitized input.
       
 (DIR) Post #B8oOcIXHzXcxUF3SRk by virtulis@loud.computer
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @ariadne how are you not impressed by how important and serious he is o_O
       
 (DIR) Post #BAZquBO6nRgblleXE8 by virtulis@loud.computer
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @ariadne the light was on