Posts by niccolove@fosstodon.org
 (DIR) Post #B5v82aGB2NT65NSkkq by niccolove@fosstodon.org
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mastodonmigration I'm sorry that I keep being critical about this, but I really feel like I have to point out that these questions hardly make sense> Is generative AI code used or permitted to be used in Blender development?It's impossibile to determine for sure whether a PR contains AI generated code. Any big FOSS project will contain AI generated code pretty soon, regardless of its policy. > Are integrations between Blender and AI companies permitted?Blender exposes an Python (1/2)
       
 (DIR) Post #B5v82ajbGz0JYdEFcG by niccolove@fosstodon.org
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @jibsaram @mastodonmigration It's much easier than that: policies should be enforceable. Same applies to laws, by the way! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unenforced_law
       
 (DIR) Post #B5v82aoYyWyRo1YDLs by niccolove@fosstodon.org
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mastodonmigration API, it seems absurd to me that Blender would police who can use the API. I doubt it's even possible.> Are Ai companies going to be able to train their models on Blender user's content?If models are publicly available then it probably already happened. If not, then obviously not. How would a donation change anything here?
       
 (DIR) Post #B5v82c9A1R2nwCCB60 by niccolove@fosstodon.org
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @jibsaram The reasonable option IMO is the most obvious one: treat contributions as we've always done, putting the responsibility of submitted code in the author, regardless of the tools used to make the code. If the code is bad, or the MR misses obvious parts / is low quality, then it should be denied (and the author potentially banned, if it's that bad!). We don't need any extra AI rule IMO, just take responsibility for what you submit.