Posts by latelesley@mastodon.scot
 (DIR) Post #B83qGqVyzO7Hi9EovA by latelesley@mastodon.scot
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @plutarch @ArrestJK It's not quite dead yet. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfWMgWnSQUw
       
 (DIR) Post #B8EUwMohJPZEjzVZkO by latelesley@mastodon.scot
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @quixoticgeek @peterbrown @Su_G @BillySmith Just because it got funding, doesn't mean it's a success. What really needs to happen to kill these daft projects, is to benchmark the performance of a standard roof install, and have them compete on efficiency. It's one of those ideas that sounds good, but where roof or overhead installs would be more efficient, and less vulnerable to damage. Any attempt to ruggedize the panel for traffic, just reduces efficiency more.
       
 (DIR) Post #BA8djIGbZWHMW2yag4 by latelesley@mastodon.scot
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @koakuma From what I can find, you'll need to make sure the wpa_supplicant is running, do a scan, then another command to show results. Then you have to edit the wpa_supplicant.conf "You can use wpa_cli(8) to scan for networks once WPA supplicant is running:# wpa_cli scan# wpa_cli scan_resultsSelected interface 'iwm0'16:01:33.578: bssid / frequency / signal level / flags / ssidxx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx       5180    91      [WPA2-PSK-CCMP][ESS]    FRITZ!Box 1000 EZ"