Posts by indutny@mean.engineer
 (DIR) Post #B41VOY9UvRfqDFViAC by indutny@mean.engineer
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mntmn yay!
       
 (DIR) Post #B4ULjtQ3gZ8KIMdIie by indutny@mean.engineer
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @quarknova congratulations! Looks like due to accidental timing I've started similar effort, but for Node.js core!
       
 (DIR) Post #B4ULjtpa9fY9ZWZgVE by indutny@mean.engineer
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @quarknova will do!The vote is in two weeks, and I'm doing all I can to gather support for AI opposition with the petition I created.Thank you for support!
       
 (DIR) Post #B4ULjuE2gj7EnO1Dd2 by indutny@mean.engineer
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @appagalcrochet ofc, https://github.com/indutny/no-ai-in-nodejs-core ! Thank you
       
 (DIR) Post #B4d8tlHJG6EKxbYVAu by indutny@mean.engineer
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       In a way I'm glad that we started discourse on LLM use in Node.js core because it revealed to me that there are a lot more people who are not in AI hype-cycle than I previously thought. I'm now much more optimistic about the future of software engineering!Consider this:- 87.3% upvote ratio with 298 upvotes on /r/node- 76.6% upvote ratio with 50 upvotes on /r/javascript (and I just posted it)- Incredibly supportive comments on HN (!!!)
       
 (DIR) Post #B4gmfk2Ve9WshmNkrA by indutny@mean.engineer
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       I'm so appreciative of @bengl right now. Their PR that proposes adding policy on LLM-generated contributions is receiving lots of feedback from other project maintainers and has helped me uncover additional concerns about LLM: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/62447Like, I haven't thought until yesterday evening that LLM written code is completely antithetical to MIT-license under which Node.js is written. LLMs are designed to destroy attribution, but MIT license is built on top of it.
       
 (DIR) Post #B4gmjSdgHbvPtfXgjA by indutny@mean.engineer
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @zkat @bengl I disagree with the “unenforceable” argument too, but I deeply respect contributors posting this comment. They are part of the driving force behind Node.js and I don't think they have ill intentions even though we are not in agreement on LLM use.
       
 (DIR) Post #B6OfXqKQHD74yBneHQ by indutny@mean.engineer
       3 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @andrewrk I'm also appreciative of bun staying true to their spirit throughout the process. They started as an aggressive competitor to Node.js, drove their popularity with benchmarks of questionable quality, hired a bunch of people and put them through a constant crunch, and finally fully became a slopware.This could have been a completely consistent Pokemon evolution!
       
 (DIR) Post #BAXWkUDJO6y2g2UzEu by indutny@mean.engineer
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mntmn gosh, I want this badly now. This is looking so good!!