Posts by barthalion@social.treehouse.systems
 (DIR) Post #B4K15elymRA4cfp7B2 by barthalion@social.treehouse.systems
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @ariadne Not only X but Y
       
 (DIR) Post #B6DLvDDXCtE2nSsuB6 by barthalion@social.treehouse.systems
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       GitLab could have won by not doing anything at all but they would rather be renaming issues to work items, adding a dumb split view for the issue tracker, and working on other misfeatures no one asked for, anything but fixing 5+ years old bugs and half-assed functionality. And this doesn’t even touch the layoffs and “AI first” pivot.
       
 (DIR) Post #B6mwi54z7ySrzbpqFs by barthalion@social.treehouse.systems
       1 likes, 2 repeats
       
       We have updated Flathub's LLM policy to explicitly disallow AI usage for both the submission process and applications being submitted.https://github.com/flathub-infra/documentation/commit/992f57b30de98ddbd5e80959e9672998c83c8c97I've had some reservations about it, so the wording before that commit was relatively milder. I know it's an unpopular opinion on the Fediverse, but I do think LLMs are inevitable, and the reality is that you can expect less organically grown code as time goes on. I believe it can be a useful tool in and outside FOSS; I hoped we will see a larger number of apps where authors made some effort beyond prompting an agent. Meanwhile, the number of unpleasant interactions I've had with entitled submitters acting as if they were bestowing their brilliant software upon us idiots who are rejecting it went through the roof in the last month. I'm tired.As always, we are not applying this retroactively, so any vibecoded apps which were already published will remain available.
       
 (DIR) Post #B7UhnsQHmdv3Fs1eVc by barthalion@social.treehouse.systems
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mntmn QCS6490 is the one with working suspend?