Posts by alextecplayz@techhub.social
(DIR) Post #B4DUPCDMCsPoPFZxgm by alextecplayz@techhub.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@omgubuntu pretty!
(DIR) Post #B4yewixvag7pVe6Yuu by alextecplayz@techhub.social
0 likes, 1 repeats
@null0x0 note that the company behind the site is a crawler addon that was blocked by LinkedIn, so there is some bias, and the text reads like AI-generated slophttps://social.treehouse.systems/@vantiss/116342005257886265Not that it's untrue, LinkedIn specifically scans for addons that are crawling their sites.
(DIR) Post #B57VYGPMxqJ4pEqDQW by alextecplayz@techhub.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@EUCommission ughWhat about any initiatives to train AI models on properly licensed content? Have you considered partnering with the Fairly Trained initiative?We lack LLMs that are trained on proper content, they're all trained on plagiarized and stolen work, including copyrighted texts.
(DIR) Post #B5We4JJ5NZOhfQgywK by alextecplayz@techhub.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@EUCommission thank you for being here 🩷
(DIR) Post #B5XlK9NSxQyiLICX5c by alextecplayz@techhub.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@frameworkcomputer love to see that you dropped sponsoring Omarchy, ty for not supporting DHH anymore 🩷
(DIR) Post #B636XSGu8rrBdz4j0y by alextecplayz@techhub.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@mntmn what the hell lol
(DIR) Post #B63HwGL0kPPJMq1mQy by alextecplayz@techhub.social
1 likes, 1 repeats
In another sickening twist to Google's grasp on Android, Google can now require you to have an Android device with Google Mobile Services, or an iOS device with the reCAPTCHA mobile app installed, in order to solve CAPTCHAs.https://support.google.com/recaptcha/answer/16609652and archive: https://archive.is/Fq196#Google #reCAPTCHA #CAPTCHA #privacy #GMS #Android
(DIR) Post #B9dMeKJYdREp8iv2HY by alextecplayz@techhub.social
1 likes, 0 repeats
@q3k welcome back to WatchMojo, today's Top 10 is Top 10 Numbers. Starting off at number 10 is number 10! Coming up at number 9 is number 9....
(DIR) Post #B9vJuXtDUFSrys6U6a by alextecplayz@techhub.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@9to5linux "Every submission, AI-assisted or not, is still expected to meet Debian‘s usual standards for quality, correctness, maintainability, and legal compliance, and using an AI tool doesn’t reduce the contributor’s responsibility for what they submit.According to the general resolution published today by the Debian Project, blindly uploading AI-generated material without review is explicitly called out as inconsistent with how Debian already operates. Disclosure of AI assistance is encouraged, not required."Which means that no, someone trying to upload a package to Debian that's just a bunch of commits from Claude (e.g. ship fast and break things) likely won't make it into Debian because it's just garbage slop. Disclosure would have been nice to be required, though."The text also sidesteps the unresolved legal questions around AI output, copyright, and training data, leaving contributors to use their own judgment on provenance and licensing, with Debian’s existing policies on licensing and software freedom still applying regardless of tooling."I'd rather trust lawyers and the judicial system to handle the legal part of AI, and whether it's infringing copyright, using stolen or unlicensed training data, etc.And there are 'open' LLM models such as IBM Granite which according to Stanford's Foundation Model Transparency Index, IBM scores the highest of all tested companies in 2025, at 95% (https://crfm.stanford.edu/fmti/December-2025/index.html). It would've been 100% were it not for 5 indicators, 'External reproducibility of capabilities evaluation', 'External reproducibility of mitigations evaluation', 'Geographic statistics', 'Enterprise users' and 'AUP enforcement frequency'. They disclosed how much CO2 was emitted for a model, for example: "295.2 tCO2eq for Granite 3.0 8b.""The resolution also notes that contributors are barred from feeding confidential or security-sensitive Debian material, embargoed bug info, credentials, or infrastructure details into third-party AI services without authorization, and reiterates that large-scale automated actions still require prior discussion and a human who stays accountable for the result."Obvious, nobody wants to shove confidential stuff into an AI, but there arw morons here and there that mistakenly include private API tokens or stuff that should remain secret into ChatGPT or Claude or whatever.
(DIR) Post #B9vyprMZkma538iisy by alextecplayz@techhub.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@gamingonlinux aww
(DIR) Post #B9wHBlK6gkBJra9vpg by alextecplayz@techhub.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@gamingonlinux wow, that sucks, and I'm sorry to hear that. Fedi can be just as toxic as any other platform.I've come to realize at times that Fedi boils my blood just as much as Twitter did, but instead of being angry at obvious right-wing ragebait and 'haha liberals / dems suck', I'm angry at people that lack nuanced takes and are on either side of the discourse.Fuck the pro-AI sloppers (more specifically the corpo bootlickers that use LLM without a care for quality or review, obvious slop and vibe-coded bullshit, hypebros that think AI is the best thing ever and we're entering some new era, or that AI helps us get closer to actual artificial intelligence, digital consciousness, etc.), and fuck the anti-AI extremists (more specifically the anti-AI people that shun you out of existence and call you a neo-nazi, a fascist or a plain ol' corpo bootlicker because to some very minimal, personal, and subjective extent, genAI might make your life just a tad bit easier, regardless if it's cloud or local, regardless if it's a corpo model such as Claude, ChatGPT, or more 'open' models).
(DIR) Post #BAIh3flA6cOvQyxt9E by alextecplayz@techhub.social
0 likes, 0 repeats
@gamingonlinux ""In other words, we think AI should be voiced by AI - not to offend AI. This feels especially important nowadays, with AGI almost here."where? where's AGI? is it right around the corner? is it just beyond the horizon? is it behind me? where the fuck is the AGI, Gaijin? lmao what morons