Posts by 9pfs@tilde.zone
 (DIR) Post #B5mwfLlC7y27h90hI8 by 9pfs@tilde.zone
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @domi wouldn't that basically be CGI-script-like behavior without the DoS potential of actual CGI scripts?
       
 (DIR) Post #B5p3Y9zEahAv9F12Se by 9pfs@tilde.zone
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @iro_miya lemme guess, LLMs?also, wait, is it already may for some of the world? (april here)
       
 (DIR) Post #B6644DcNvZgzMfvwaO by 9pfs@tilde.zone
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @domi deletemarketosanti-sale OS
       
 (DIR) Post #B6FqZ6hkE5aH7dsGyO by 9pfs@tilde.zone
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @privateger may I give unrelated information that may help anyone wanting to prevent the tailscale control plane from being able to influence their network at all? don't want to do so without consent since it can be rude to do so
       
 (DIR) Post #B6Fr6EARV5OdpA5gES by 9pfs@tilde.zone
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @privateger not that, just that tailscale by default/in all states where it's allowed to do firewall modifications (which is any case where the --firewall-mode= setting is set to default) will allow all traffic in on the tailscale interface, in theory making you a single bad/malicious ACL update away from things meant to never be accessible from other machines being reachable, and that it may be a good idea to, depending on environment, remove tailscale's firewall editing privileges (it should run fine even without them) and instead manually create any amount from "none" to "all but the accept all" of tailscale's normal rules yourself to get a similar result with better securitynot sure if tailnet lock makes ACL updates more secure or something, but regardless, it can be nice to be able to manage firewall rules for all interfaces in the same place and not have to ask the question "wait, what if that external service forgets how to tell my device not to expose my (example) retro computing telnet server meant for LAN use to servers that run non-friendly software"hope I haven't been annoying at all by sending this
       
 (DIR) Post #B6bPw343VGXXCy8wca by 9pfs@tilde.zone
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @domi do you run a talk daemon :3
       
 (DIR) Post #B6kLH27Xw11iNTLwHo by 9pfs@tilde.zone
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @puniko happy birthday! (saw fedi posts wishing you a happy birthday, so decided to join in)
       
 (DIR) Post #B7g1fx07gJGeVaCvs8 by 9pfs@tilde.zone
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @ariadne why would they even need a tarball an absurd amount of times
       
 (DIR) Post #B7oTz8j4fENIM8qpKy by 9pfs@tilde.zone
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @ariadne Does an AUR package for that software exist, out of curiosity?