Reply-To: nulldogma@aol.com (Nulldogma)
Message-ID: <4lujgs$db6@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
X-Gateway: ZCONNECT UU tindrum.tng.oche.de [DUUCP BETA vom 30.03.1996], RFC1036/822 KY key.GUN.de [DUUCP BETA vom 06.01.1995]
References: <4luit9$d3s@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
From: nulldogma@aol.com (Nulldogma)
Subject: Re: Spoilers (was Re: WAITING & other bothers)
Date: 27 Apr 1996 22:01:00 +0000
Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com
Path: nntp.gmd.de!news.rwth-aachen.de!news.tng.oche.de!tindrum.tng.oche.de!key.gun.de!news2.gtn.com!news.gtn.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news-e2a.gnn.com!newstf01.news.aol.com!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail!root
Newsgroups: rec.games.int-fiction
Distribution: world
Lines: 11

>You, (Jacob) the reader, are ultimately responsible. You can close your
>eyes.

I'm not Jacob, but... Doesn't this bring us back where we started? Yes, if
we know that something is going to ruin our fun, we can choose not to read
it. Which is exactly why people are asking for spoiler warnings -- so they
can choose what to read and what not to read.

This is all getting very silly.

Neil
