Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!ira.uka.de!THD-News!iti.informatik.th-darmstadt.de!schrod
From: schrod@iti.informatik.th-darmstadt.de (Joachim Schrod)
Subject: Re: Is there a manuscript.sty?
Sender: news@infoserver.th-darmstadt.de (The Usenet-News System)
Message-ID: <1991Jun27.112938.21202@infoserver.th-darmstadt.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1991 11:29:38 GMT
Lines: 19
Reply-To: xitijsch@ddathd21.bitnet (Joachim Schrod)
References:  <rad.678000303@vulcan>
Organization: TU Darmstadt

In article <rad.678000303@vulcan>, rad@vulcan.anu.edu.au (Robin Davies) writes:

> For a few purposes TeX output is just too pretty.

I'm just curious: for which purposes?

I just asked because ``pretty'' is (IMHO) the wrong term. A document
should first be readable. If this readibility is considered pretty, fine!
   And why does one want to produce an unreadable document? (And in
fact, the rest of your posting describes a style creating an
unreadable document!)

--
Joachim

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Joachim Schrod				Email: xitijsch@ddathd21.bitnet
Computer Science Department
Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany
