Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cunixb.cc.columbia.edu!es1
From: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita)
Subject: Re: Amiga is better then what???
Message-ID: <1991Jun30.032125.8794@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
Sender: usenet@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (The Network News)
Nntp-Posting-Host: cunixb.cc.columbia.edu
Reply-To: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita)
Organization: Columbia University
References: <1991Jun27.200127.23004@informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <1991Jun27.211005.9179@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> <SCOTT.91Jun29205654@drizzle.cs.odu.edu>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1991 03:21:25 GMT

In article <SCOTT.91Jun29205654@drizzle.cs.odu.edu> scott@cs.odu.edu (Scott D. Yelich) writes:
>
>Also, tell me what it would take to get the Amiga 500/1000 to
>run Unix, X windows and have a 1024x1024x8 display.
>
	Who cares? That's like asking what would it take to turn
a PC XT into a file server for an Ethernet LAN with 100 machines.
It is pointless. You buy the machine appropriate for your needs.
Of course, you CAN get that A500 to run X-Windows on a 1024x1024
4 grey-scale monitor under AmigaDOS.
	-- Ethan

FF buckets of bits on the bus,	FF buckets of bits.
Take one down,			Short it to ground,
FE buckets of bits on the bus.

