Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cunixb.cc.columbia.edu!es1
From: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita)
Subject: Re: Amiga bashing
Message-ID: <1991Jun29.161209.3959@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
Sender: usenet@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (The Network News)
Nntp-Posting-Host: cunixb.cc.columbia.edu
Reply-To: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita)
Organization: Columbia University
References: <1151@stewart.UUCP> <1991Jun25.123841.1186@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> <1162@redford.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1991 16:12:09 GMT

In article <1162@redford.UUCP> jerry@redford.UUCP (Jerry Shekhel) writes:
>
>Too bad the Amiga does not have adequate resolution for GUI's.  Believe
>me, at the lower resolutions, VGA does quite well as far as screen updates
>go.
>
	Hmm. I guess NeXT also has a real problem, since both
machines work at 1024x1024 with 4 grey-scales.
	-- Ethan

FF buckets of bits on the bus,	FF buckets of bits.
Take one down,			Short it to ground,
FE buckets of bits on the bus.

