Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!ncoast!catfood
From: catfood@NCoast.ORG (Mark W. Schumann)
Subject: Re: Borland language extension virtual function = [ ... ];
Organization: North Coast Public Access Un*x (ncoast)
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 1991 02:53:03 GMT
Message-ID: <1991Jul1.025303.4881@NCoast.ORG>
References: <1991Jun27.130247.5107@mathcs.sjsu.edu> <kF1041w163w@dorsai.com> <15072@ulysses.att.com>
Lines: 14

mwb@ulysses.att.com (Michael W. Balk) writes:
>I was thinking of buying Borland C++, but if Borland is really going to install
>non-ANSI approved syntax into their product I will probably reconsider the
>purchase.  Does anyone know of any other C++ vendors who might be doing or
>considering doing the same sort of thing with their C++ compilers?

Or just don't use the extensions and invoke the compiler flags for
"Standard C++" and ignore 'em.

-- 
Mark W. Schumann  3111 Mapledale Avenue, Cleveland 44109 USA
Domain: catfood@ncoast.org
UUCP:   ...!mailrus!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!ncoast!catfood
"A union can't participate in a class hierarchy.  It can't
