Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!mintaka!geech.gnu.ai.mit.edu!rjc
From: rjc@geech.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Ray Cromwell)
Subject: Re: YOU PEOPLE HAD BETTER GET WIT THE PROGRAM!! (Was: Re: Commodore Business Machines)
Message-ID: <1991Jun23.194902.21351@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu>
Sender: news@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu
Organization: The Internet
References: <7471@vela.acs.oakland.edu$ <4190@ux.acs.umn.edu>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 91 19:49:02 GMT
Lines: 21

In article <4190@ux.acs.umn.edu> mmoore@ux.acs.umn.edu (Malcolm Diallo Moore) writes:
>And you people can sit there and laff and dis him if you want to; yeah he
>may be a rathead and an asshole and all that, but if you really look at 
>what he's saying, you know that he's exactly right.

   It's not what Marc says, it's how he says it. Marc doesn't
say "I am displeased with Commodore service, I wish C= marketing would
advertise better." Instead Marc say, "Commodore will _NEVER_ market
the Amiga correctly." Notice the difference? One of them is a sincere
question about Commodore's competence in marketing, the other is a just
a slanderous statement. Yes, we all deserve to take out frustrations some
times (slandering) but Marc has had his fill, and he continues to do it.
And Marc is not right all the time either, somethings he just doesn't
know what he's talking about (e.g. "The Clipboard is intended for
ASCII only transfer.")

--
/ INET:rjc@gnu.ai.mit.edu     *   // The opinions expressed here do not      \
| INET:r_cromwe@upr2.clu.net  | \X/  in any way reflect the views of my self.|
\ UUCP:uunet!tnc!m0023        *                                              /

