Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!lobster!sugar!peter
From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Subject: Re: Real Time UNIX (Re: NeXT software size)
Message-ID: <1991May13.004526.717@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Organization: Sugar Land Unix -- Houston, TX
References: <1991May6.112709.8280@sugar.hackercorp.com> <361@ncmicro.lonestar.org> <947@cns.SanDiego.NCR.COM>
Date: Mon, 13 May 1991 00:45:26 GMT

In article <947@cns.SanDiego.NCR.COM> dltaylor@cns.SanDiego.NCR.COM (Dan Taylor) writes:
> Given the grief that many of us suffered under 1.0 and 1.1, I wonder if
> we wouldn't have been better off with C= buying OS-9/68K, which was
> reasonably stable, at the time, then adding the part of AmigaDOS that
> really shines, Intuition, and the support for the graphics chips, as
> Microware has added graphics support to OS-9, finally.  Please, no
> flames, it's just an idle thought.

I asked about that, at the time. The response I got indicated that nobody at
Amiga had ever heard of Microware.

Weird.
-- 
Peter da Silva.   `-_-'
<peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>.
