Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!stanford.edu!neon.Stanford.EDU!torrie
From: torrie@cs.stanford.edu (Evan Torrie)
Subject: Re: An interesting idea...
Message-ID: <1991May9.001717.22628@neon.Stanford.EDU>
Sender: torrie@neon.Stanford.EDU (Evan James Torrie)
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Ca , USA
References: <rbaGn&?=1@cs.psu.edu> <1991May5.115329.24187@sugar.hackercorp.com><_g5Gy0x*1@  cs.psu.edu> <1991May6.110530.7978@sugar.hackercorp.com><=0bGppm&1@cs.psu.edu>   <12870@aggie.ucdavis.edu> <mo5G9+x&1@cs.psu.edu><12876@aggie.ucdavis.edu><bfbGl+*&1@cs.psu.edu> <3325.tnews@templar.actrix.gen.nz>
Date: Thu, 9 May 1991 00:17:17 GMT
Lines: 22

jbickers@templar.actrix.gen.nz (John Bickers) writes:

>Quoted from <bfbGl+*&1@cs.psu.edu> by melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger):
>> I understood what you meant.  I wanted to get acrossed the point that
>> the NeXT produces a superior machine.  That is what's important right?

>    Not in the context you were using, re competing with the "big boys".
>    That definitely implied commercial viability. I don't think the NeXT
>    comes close to the "big boys" in the quality field, as far as
>    real workstations go.

  John, 

  Does NeXT have any presence in the EnZed market?

Evan.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evan Torrie.  Stanford University, Class of 199?       torrie@cs.stanford.edu   
"Cold is God's way of telling us to burn more Catholics" - Lady Whiteadder

