Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cunixb.cc.columbia.edu!es1
From: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita)
Subject: Re: AMIGA
Message-ID: <1991May6.164821.8807@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
Sender: usenet@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (The Network News)
Nntp-Posting-Host: cunixb.cc.columbia.edu
Reply-To: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita)
Organization: Columbia University
References: <1991May5.185506.5004@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <1991May5.212810.28755@wam.umd.edu> <1991May6.115535.8982@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 6 May 1991 16:48:21 GMT

In article <1991May6.115535.8982@sugar.hackercorp.com> peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
>
>> As a parallel question, what is
>> the maximum frame-rate for animations where the frames are not in memory,
>> but being read from disk during the animation?
>
>60 FPS, again.
>
	I'm afraid your hard drive is a tad faster than mine. My
Quantum can read slightly greater than 1MB/sec I believe if it is
nice and contiguous, but if each frame is 32K then that makes
1920K/sec. However, 60fps is irrelevant. 30 and 24 are far more
meaningful. 

	-- Ethan

"Brain! Brain! What is Brain?"
