Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uupsi!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Subject: Re: Summary: What's wrong with SCO (long)
Message-ID: <MLYA0S7@xds13.ferranti.com>
Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
References: <1991Apr14.022153.2099@emisle.uucp> <1991Apr16.183342.10185@compu.com> <1991Apr17.210627.4517@beaver.cs.washington.edu> <1991Apr18.063914.13111@kithrup.COM>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 91 15:39:54 GMT

In article <1991Apr18.063914.13111@kithrup.COM> sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan) writes:
> Point in SCO's favor:  AT&T and Intel have adopted sco's
> implementation for the iBCS thingy; as a result, ISC is not compatable with
> the standard, and any isc-written COFF program will not work on future
> releases.

How does this jibe with Intel dropping direct sales of UNIX and passing it
on to ISC?

It's almost enough to make me want to try OSF/1. Almost.
-- 
Peter da Silva.  `-_-'  peter@ferranti.com
+1 713 274 5180.  'U`  "Have you hugged your wolf today?"
