Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uupsi!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Subject: Re: Summary: What's wrong with SCO (long)
Message-ID: <I-XAL55@xds13.ferranti.com>
Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
References: <1991Apr14.022153.2099@emisle.uucp> <1991Apr16.183342.10185@compu.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 91 22:31:28 GMT

In article <1991Apr16.183342.10185@compu.com> fred@compu.com (Fred Rump) writes:
> dvb@emisle.uucp (David Van Beveren) writes:
> >The one-line summary is this: People who have SCO Unix are satisfied with it.

>         Reading the various responses I get a different message back.
>         It seems that satisfied is a bit of an understatement.

Reading the responses, I get a different message back. It seems that SCO is
as buggy as all hell, but if you never do anything but run canned stuff
you never excersize the bugs.
-- 
Peter da Silva.  `-_-'  peter@ferranti.com
+1 713 274 5180.  'U`  "Have you hugged your wolf today?"
