Newsgroups: comp.text.desktop
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!batcomputer!cornell!uw-beaver!june.cs.washington.edu!graham
From: graham@june.cs.washington.edu (Stephen Graham)
Subject: Re: UNIX desktop pub.
Message-ID: <1991Apr18.210211.6559@beaver.cs.washington.edu>
Keywords: Interleaf, Frame?, compare
Sender: news@beaver.cs.washington.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: Computer Science & Engineering, U. of Washington, Seattle
References: <2325@abcom.ATT.COM> <JXkk12w164w@questor.wimsey.bc.ca> <1991Apr18.173625.16895@wam.umd.edu>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 91 21:02:11 GMT

In article <1991Apr18.173625.16895@wam.umd.edu> mikec@wam.umd.edu (Michael D. Callaghan) writes:
[request for comparison of FrameMaker and Interleaf. Follow-up message
 urging use of NeXT.]
>
>Also, Frame costs $995 retail, $495 edu for the NeXT. If you get it for
>the Sun, you have to pay over $1000 per YEAR for the license! Not good.

Amazing. And I just paid $100 for my educational FrameMaker license for
a SPARCstation. Just amaaaaazing.

Also, bozo, try to remember that the original post may have been from
someone who ALREADY HAS A SUN NETWORK. No, they don't want to investigate
a NeXT. They want to use what they've already got, thank you.

(Computer brand fanatics really piss me off.)
-- 

Steve Graham
graham@isis.ee.washington.edu
(206) 543-8115
