Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!ox.com!hela!hela.iti.org!scs
From: scs@iti.org (Steve Simmons)
Subject: Re: v01INF1: Status - Status of comp.sources.reviewed
Message-ID: <scs.671464069@hela.iti.org>
Sender: usenet@iti.org (Hela News Manager)
Organization: Industrial Technology Institute
References: <1991Apr11.022612.2522@rick.doc.ca> <9418: Apr1121:48:4291@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1991 13:47:49 GMT

brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes:

>In article <1991Apr11.022612.2522@rick.doc.ca> csr@calvin.doc.ca (Andrew Patrick) writes:
>> There has been a lot of activity "behind-the-scenes" among the reviewers
>> in getting the newsgroup setup.

>Of course. So all the people who voted for the group are now getting
>a group that may only loosely correspond to what was proposed at first.
>This isn't a flame, just an observation.

And one with no basis in fact.  We're ironing out the rules on notifying
submitters, when reviewers have to get data back to the moderators, etc,
etc.  Purely administrative.  Note the "we".  I speak from facts, not
guesses.
-- 
"Our informal mission is to improve the love life of operators worldwide."
  Peter Behrendt, president of Exabyte.  Quoted in Digital Review, Feb 4, 1991.
