Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uupsi!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Subject: Re: Amiga 3000UX, X, OpenLook, Motif, Color, A2410, Etc. (somewhat long)
Message-ID: <3KHASM9@xds13.ferranti.com>
Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
References: <IY9A1XE@xds13.ferranti.com> <1991Apr3.231414.23689@uvm.edu>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 91 18:23:34 GMT

In article <1991Apr3.231414.23689@uvm.edu> pegram@kira.UUCP (Robert B. Pegram) writes:
> Most all of this has been fixed now, send flames to .advocacy ok?

This isn't a flame... it's a simple statement of fact. The Atari ST was
sufficiently compelling a product that people did buy them when it looked
like the Amiga was stalled. I got an Atari ST from one such person when
he finally got an Amiga. The point I was trying to make is simply that
if Commodore hadn't shipped something there wouldn't have been *any*
market left for them to sell Amiga 1000s to.

And the phrase "victim" is entirely appropriate. My buddy and I were both
victims of the "my god, Commodore, when ARE you going to ship" syndrome.
If they hadn't shipped when they did, we'd be using TOS now.

(luckily I had little enough invested in the Atari I could get an Amiga
 without cringing)

> In
> any case, I've had to do less to my Atari to keep current than I would
> have if I had gotten a 1000 - rather a sad commentary on Atari and
> Commodore both, for different reasons.

My Amiga 1000 is still, as of today, "current". And I haven't done anything
to it. I'll have to do the first upgrade, five years later, when 2.0 comes
out. Not bad.
-- 
Peter da Silva.  `-_-'  peter@ferranti.com
+1 713 274 5180.  'U`  "Have you hugged your wolf today?"
