Newsgroups: comp.sys.novell
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!fcom.cc.utah.edu!npd.novell.com!news
From: timm@sed.novell.com (Tim Myers)
Subject: Re: Mac NLM for '386
Message-ID: <1991Apr10.012744.21630@npd.Novell.COM>
Sender: news@npd.Novell.COM
Organization: Novell, Inc.
References: <1991Apr7.200336.451@husc3.harvard.edu>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 91 01:27:44 GMT

In article <1991Apr7.200336.451@husc3.harvard.edu> 
schoen2@husc9.harvard.edu (Michael Schoen) writes:
> Hi there.  I will soon be implementing a Novell network for
> PCs and Macs.  I had been planning to use SFT, because there
> was no support for Macs on 386.  But in v. 3.11 (I believe)
> an NLM for Macs was introduced.  My network consultant has
> cautioned me, however, that it may be buggy.  Does anyone have
> any experience with it yet?  How does it compare to the Mac
> support in SFT?

I have used NetWare v3.11 and the NetWare for Macintosh v3.0 NLMs
for several months now. Compared to previous versions, it is faster
and offers more Mac support including AppleTalk routing, AppleTalk
phase II, and AFP 2.0. This is the most reliable version of NetWare
for Macintosh we have released.

++Tim

=========================================
Tim Myers
Senior Software Consultant
Novell, Inc.
"Macintosh: the only GUI that doesn't SUCK."

