Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!cec2!news
From: bdo8650@cec_ss3.wustl.edu (...Dude Guy...)
Subject: Question about Tex 3.0
Message-ID: <1991Apr4.020837.24132@cec1.wustl.edu>
Organization: Washington University, St. Louis MO
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 91 02:08:37 GMT

I just compiled Tex 3.0 on a Decstation 3100 (Ultrix 4.0).  Everything
seems to work fine. The only problem that I have run into is a file
that works perfectly on 2.991 but formats in-correctly on 3.0 

(Bear with me, its nothing fancy, I am just learning TeX.)
Here is the latex document:  (well part of it, anyway...)

---begin---
\documentstyle{article}
%...title stuff delete...
\begin{document}
\subsection{BJT}
\begin{enumerate}
\item The construction of the load lines are shown on the accompanying
blowup of the {\em polaroid\/} taken of the transistor curve tracer.  
The markings were created using pencil, so they are quite hard to 
distinguish.  The $Q$ point was determined using the {\em midpoint biasing\/} 
technique.  $V_{CEQ}$ and $I_{CQ}$ are determined by reading the
corresponding $V_{CE}$ and $I_{C}$ value from the curve tracer output.
$I_{BQ}$ can be determined by interpolating between the two nearest
$I_{B}$ values.
\end{enumerate}
\end{document}
---end---

It will LaTeX correctly, and create a DVI file with no errors.
But printing it out/XDvi-ing reveals that it stops at the first $Q$.

Any ideas?

The TeX 2.991 version correctly formats the correct document.


Respond by E-Mail, no need to clutter the net with a silly
problem.

THANKS.

Bryan D. O'Connor                                  bryan@frontier.wustl.edu
Computer Engineering                               6718 Delor Street  
Office of the Network Coordinator                  Saint Louis, MO  63109
Washington University in Saint Louis               38 37 38 N / 90 11 52 W
