Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uupsi!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Subject: Re: RFD:  comp.sources.minix moderated or comp.os.minix.sources
Message-ID: <PPGAOW8@xds13.ferranti.com>
Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
References: <AFBAJZ6@xds13.ferranti.com> <1991Mar29.133150.13165@cs.utk.edu> <KKCAH51@xds13.ferranti.com> <1991Mar31.132500.28795@cs.utk.edu> <25259@ttidca.TTI.COM>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 91 18:09:44 GMT

In article <25259@ttidca.TTI.COM> clark@ttidca.TTI.COM (Ralph Clark) writes:
> I completely agree.  Issuing a Request For Discussion does not mandate a
> vote.  I haven't seen any support for this split from anyone who actually
> posts sources.

It's the people who want to *use* the sources I'm concerned about. As an
alternative, do you suppose all the people who post sources could be
convinced to add "Archive-name:" entries as the first line of their
messages? I don't. But I do see a need for some such mechanism to
separate the wheat from the chaff.
-- 
Peter da Silva.  `-_-'  peter@ferranti.com
+1 713 274 5180.  'U`  "Have you hugged your wolf today?"
