Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!menudo.uh.edu!sugar!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Subject: Re: Dynamic typing (part 3)
Message-ID: <FM4AUI8@xds13.ferranti.com>
Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
References: <602@optima.cs.arizona.edu> <2400035@otter.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 91 15:44:27 GMT

In article <2400035@otter.hpl.hp.com> sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com (Steve Knight) writes:
> Of course, being choked to death by irate C programmers is only one of the
> many hazards of using a dynamically typed language ...

Looks to me like this is more a factor of the richness of the runtime
library, rather than the fact that it's dynamically typed. Of course,
dynamically typed languages often have a rich subroutine library, but
that's not always true. Consider Lisp 1.5, or CScheme.
-- 
Peter da Silva.  `-_-'  peter@ferranti.com
+1 713 274 5180.  'U`  "Have you hugged your wolf today?"
