Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!maytag!watdragon!spurge!ccplumb
From: ccplumb@spurge.uwaterloo.ca (Colin Plumb)
Subject: Re: Intel bugs / bugged by Intel :-(
Message-ID: <1990Oct29.174550.19883@watdragon.waterloo.edu>
Sender: daemon@watdragon.waterloo.edu (Owner of Many System Processes)
Organization: University of Waterloo
References: <JSP.90Oct25155458@glia.u.washington.edu> <13056@encore.Encore.COM>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 90 17:45:50 GMT
Lines: 13

In article <13056@encore.Encore.COM> jcallen@encore.Com (Jerry Callen) writes:
>No argument there; I'm a big believer in making bug lists public (even
>though companies I work for may not necessarily agree...). Moto does;
>I have bug lists for each rev of the 88100/88200 chips. Getting them
>was not hard; I called up Moto and they faxed them to me.

Well, Michael Slater weakened this argument, but someone leaning over
my shoulder suggested it was an economic necessaity for Intel.  Motorola's
bug lists are probably a few pages.  Intel would need to send out a small
book.  Yes, tongue-in-cheek, but Intel's bug lists are famous for their
size.
-- 
	-Colin
