Newsgroups: comp.dsp
Path: utzoo!henry
From: henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer)
Subject: Re: Communicating DSP Equations (was: Re: DSP textbook)
Message-ID: <1989Sep24.032009.11720@utzoo.uucp>
Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
References: <PSHEN.89Sep22020601@atrp.mit.edu> <1989Sep20.195449.3833x@ivucsb.sba.ca.us> <7070001@hpnmdla.HP.COM> <459@eedsp.gatech.edu> <668@suntops.Tops.Sun.COM> <19237@gatech.edu>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 89 03:20:09 GMT

In article <19237@gatech.edu> ken@gatech.UUCP (Ken Seefried III) writes:
>Personally, I would advocate TeX/LaTeX for communicating equations.
>It has the advantage of running on a vast number of horribly baroque
>machines, having a wide array of output drivers and, most importantly,
>it is relatively readable in unprocessed form, unlike something like
>postscript or eqn.

Uh, agreed about postscript, but somebody has misinformed you about eqn.
TeX's math notation is a LESS-readable clone of eqn (more or less).
See related posting.
-- 
"Where is D.D. Harriman now,   |     Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology
when we really *need* him?"    | uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu
