Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!ois.db.toronto.edu!hogg
From: hogg@db.toronto.edu (John Hogg)
Subject: Re: Shuttle Facilities ( was : Shuttle trips to the Moon )
Message-ID: <89Jan25.095342est.9381@ois.db.toronto.edu>
Organization: University of Toronto, CSRI
References: <40ebe2ca.298d@dl298d.engin.umich.edu> <2070003@hpcilzb.HP.COM> <2453@phred.UUCP> <7233@csli.STANFORD.EDU>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 89 09:53:37 EST

In article <7233@csli.STANFORD.EDU> jkl@csli.UUCP (John Kallen) writes:
>The VAB is *big*, but wouldn't whatver the Soviets use to stack their
>Energias be bigger?  Does anybody know anything about how they
>assemble, say, Buran?

Horizontally, the same way that they assemble all their launchers.
Among other advantages of this system, the building doesn't have to be
so big.

In the December issue of Spaceflight are a number of pictures of Buran;
one of them shows the stacked Buran/Energia system leaving the assembly
building.  The stack is reminiscent of the Orbiter/747 combination.
-- 
John Hogg			hogg@csri.utoronto.ca
Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto

