Mon Mar 13 09:56 EDT; goldblum
==============================

  I have mixed feelings about the idea of signing posts
  cryptographically, as part of my general questioning of our
  over-dependence on crypto as a trust medium. I've written before about
  how prevalent this is, and the way it's used to beguile lay people.
  Most people have no idea about specifically what it is they're feeling
  more confident about when they believe something to be
  "cryptographically secure."

  But, I do like the idea of using signatures as a form of punctuation.
  For example,

  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
  Hash: SHA512

  don't trust anything you see coming from me which appears to be
  signed.
  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

  iHUEARYKAB0WIQQfqJjzjharo5rcE5YygDxZFVO+2gUCZA8tYQAKCRAygDxZFVO+
  2ge3AQCb46HIox4p3S1C5i7XJJmeECUxWUCPnTl8xlSJget0DQEA9QKvRGC2MB5d
  dO3wjj1UgqR2VxWx3TWiMqg3oAYgWQI=
  =X6vL
  -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  It almost certainly is fraudulent.