[HN Gopher] Two Twisty Shapes Resolve a Centuries-Old Topology P...
___________________________________________________________________
Two Twisty Shapes Resolve a Centuries-Old Topology Puzzle
Author : tzury
Score : 49 points
Date : 2026-01-26 20:12 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (www.quantamagazine.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.quantamagazine.org)
| abetusk wrote:
| I'm no expert but, from what I understand, the idea is that they
| found two 3D shapes (maybe 2D skins in 3D space?) that have the
| same mean curvature and metric but are topologically different (
| _and_ aren 't mirror images of each other). This is the first
| (non-trivial) pair of finite (compact) shapes that have been
| found.
|
| In other words, if you're an ant on one of these surfaces and are
| using mean curvature and the metric to determine what the shape
| is, you won't be able to differentiate between them.
|
| The paper has some more pictures of the surfaces [0]. Wikipedia's
| been updated even though the result is from Oct 2025 [1].
|
| [0] https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10240-025-00159-z
|
| [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonnet_theorem
| matheist wrote:
| To be precise, the mean curvature and metric are the same but
| the _immersions_ are different (they 're not related by an
| isometry of the ambient space).
|
| Topologically they're the same (the example found was different
| immersions of a torus).
| OgsyedIE wrote:
| Is it the case that 'they' are simply two ways of immersing
| the same two tori in R^3 such that the complements in R^3 of
| the two identical tori are topologically different?
|
| If so, isn't this just a new flavor of higher-dimensional
| knot theory?
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2026-01-28 07:01 UTC)