[HN Gopher] The mountain that weighed the Earth
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The mountain that weighed the Earth
        
       Author : surprisetalk
       Score  : 95 points
       Date   : 2026-01-26 16:43 UTC (17 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (signoregalilei.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (signoregalilei.com)
        
       | divbzero wrote:
       | > _Primary sources:_
       | 
       | > _Maskelyne's notes:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1775.0050_
       | 
       | > _Hutton's notes:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1778.0034_
       | 
       | > _Cavendish's notes on his own
       | experiment:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1798.0022_
       | 
       | I got to reproduce Cavendish's experiment when I was a student.
       | Love that we can easily read the primary source today, archived
       | and indexed by DOI.
        
         | neitsa wrote:
         | > Using the stars as a reference, Maskelyne's team found that
         | the plumb lines on either side of the mountain pointed just
         | 0.0152 degrees apart.
         | 
         | I'm really interested in knowing how they could get such a
         | precise measurement (even accounting for errors), especially in
         | the field (outdoor). There's no figure depicting the apparatus
         | they used, I wonder how it looked like.
         | 
         | Sometimes, I just ponder at how ignorant I am. If I was tasked
         | with the same assignment, I'd definitely fail and this was
         | performed 250 ago!
        
           | throwway120385 wrote:
           | Maybe something similar to a vernier caliper.
           | 
           | From Wikipedia:
           | 
           | > The first caliper with a secondary scale, which contributed
           | extra precision, was invented in 1631 by the French
           | mathematician Pierre Vernier (1580-1637).[1] Its use was
           | described in detail in English in Navigatio Britannica (1750)
           | by mathematician and historian John Barrow.[2] While calipers
           | are the most typical use of vernier scales today, they were
           | originally developed for angle-measuring instruments such as
           | astronomical quadrants.
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vernier_scale
           | 
           | So it would have been a contemporaneous technique with that
           | initial angle measurement, and the use of a Vernier scale for
           | angular measurements would have itself been common.
        
           | ahazred8ta wrote:
           | They had a vertical 'Zenith Telescope' that looked at the
           | same star from two locations. They measured how far from
           | vertical it shifted in the magnified field of view. https://e
           | n.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramsden_surveying_instruments#...
           | Similar instrumends measured the wobble of the Earth's axis.
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Latitude_Service
        
         | CobrastanJorji wrote:
         | I'd love to know what a sufficiently high precision plumb bob
         | is like. Is it very tall? How on Earth does one calibrate it?
        
       | helterskelter wrote:
       | I remember reading about this in _Mason & Dixon_. Mason, who
       | worked at the Royal Observatory, was the one who identified this
       | mountain as the best place for the experiment (and was asked to
       | help with it but declined).
       | 
       | IIRC, it was partly the Mason Dixon line that inspired this
       | experiment. They noticed syatematic errors in the line because
       | their plumb bobs were deflected by gravitational pull from local
       | terrain. At the time they speculated it was because of the
       | Alleghenies, though it was probably more localized variations in
       | gravity.
        
       | cossatot wrote:
       | Interesting...
       | 
       | A few years later, the gravitational deflection of the Himalayas
       | on a plumb line by Airy proved less than expected, which
       | suggested that mountains have 'roots' that extend below them,
       | displacing more dense rock--like icebergs more or less.
       | 
       | I used the gravitational force of the Longmenshan range to
       | calculate the perturbations in the elastic stress field of the
       | Earth's crust in Sichuan province, China, to estimate the
       | tectonic forces in the region, which caused the 2008 Wenchuan
       | earthquake:
       | https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/201...
        
       | cwmoore wrote:
       | How far does it deflect the Sun?
        
       | ck2 wrote:
       | can GPS sats figure out the mass of the earth by being able to
       | detect its gravitational distortion on their orbit?
       | 
       | or maybe that upcoming space laser interferometer (LISA) since it
       | has to figure precisely how all mass is affecting its position?
       | 
       | I love the history of figuring the circumference of the earth,
       | imagine getting it right within 2% in 240 BC
       | 
       | (then Columbus effing it up by 25%)
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_circumference#Histor...
        
         | ISL wrote:
         | Scientists use pairs of satellites to map the small variations
         | in Earth's gravitational field. It is possible to see
         | groundwater depletion and changes in distribution of glacial
         | ice, among many things.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GRACE_and_GRACE-FO
         | 
         | The primary challenge in determining the mass of Earth is
         | actually measuring the gravitational constant, G, itself.
         | Everything else involved is known at much higher precision. The
         | product of G and Earth's mass is known to two parts in a
         | billion, but the uncertainty in G is ~22 parts per million.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_constant
         | 
         | LISA is primarily sensitive to time-varying gravitational
         | gradients on timescales of a fraction of a minute to a few
         | hours and won't be terribly useful for determining the orbits
         | of objects in our solar system. (but it is very, very cool).
        
       | cjs_ac wrote:
       | > The Schiehallion experiment wasn't the state of the art for
       | long. A more precise result was achieved in 1798 by Henry
       | Cavendish, who was on the committee for the Schiehallion
       | experiment. Cavendish's experiment measured the gravity of large
       | lead spheres using an extremely precise torsion pendulum, and cut
       | the error from 20% down to 1.2%.
       | 
       | Cavendish was a peculiar fellow.
       | 
       | > At his death, Cavendish was the largest depositor in the Bank
       | of England. He was a shy man who was uncomfortable in society and
       | avoided it when he could. He could speak to only one person at a
       | time, and only if the person were known to him and male. He
       | conversed little, always dressed in an old-fashioned suit, and
       | developed no known deep personal attachments outside his family.
       | Cavendish was taciturn and solitary and regarded by many as
       | eccentric. He communicated with his female servants only by
       | notes. By one account, Cavendish had a back staircase added to
       | his house to avoid encountering his housekeeper, because he was
       | especially shy of women.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Cavendish
        
         | Eddy_Viscosity2 wrote:
         | Who was saying that autism rates are increasing because more
         | people have it now and not because we are better are
         | recognizing it??
        
       | ggm wrote:
       | It's interesting that a device based on specifically constructed
       | weights, at a scale to fit in a lab bench experiment (or at least
       | a room) were capable of providing this much accuracy compared to
       | a field experiment which used significantly larger masses, but
       | was probably subject to many many more distorting qualities and
       | estimation/rounding errors.
       | 
       | I can imagine that given enough motivation to chase down
       | accuracy, they could have re-scaled the lead weight experiment to
       | fit larger spaces, larger pendulums, assuming they could control
       | for drafts, pigeons living in St Pauls Cathedral...
        
       | augusteo wrote:
       | The precision they achieved with 18th century tools is
       | remarkable. Measuring 0.0032 degrees of deflection without modern
       | instruments, then getting within 20% of the correct answer.
       | 
       | I love stories where the constraint forces creative problem-
       | solving. They couldn't measure gravity directly, so they found a
       | mountain-sized workaround.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-01-27 10:01 UTC)