[HN Gopher] OpenFlexure Microscope
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       OpenFlexure Microscope
        
       Author : o4c
       Score  : 60 points
       Date   : 2026-01-21 04:16 UTC (6 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (openflexure.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (openflexure.org)
        
       | gnabgib wrote:
       | Popular in:
       | 
       | 2024 (189 points, 20 comments)
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42115243
       | 
       | 2021 (113 points, 39 comments)
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27216452
        
         | ChuckMcM wrote:
         | Yeah, the user 'o4c' appears to be a bot that reposts things
         | that have been previously popular.
        
           | o4c wrote:
           | Hello, first of all sorry. I am not bot, a human user.
           | 
           | I was searching for open source DIY microscope projects and
           | found the OpenFlexure Microscope as the first search result.
           | After reading through the project and finding it technically
           | interesting, I submitted it to Hacker News. Fortunately, it
           | reached the front page approximately five days after
           | submission.
           | 
           | If you search for the term "open source microscope," you will
           | see the same link appearing as the top result.
           | 
           | https://www.google.com/search?q=open+source+microscope&oq=op.
           | ..
           | 
           | From my observation, information related to precision
           | engineering is not widely known and can be difficult to find.
           | Because of this, overlapping submissions can sometimes occur.
           | I apologize if this caused any repetition. Detailed teardowns
           | of precision instruments such as gauges, metrology tools, and
           | scientific equipment are relatively rare, which contributes
           | to this situation.
        
       | anfractuosity wrote:
       | Another 3D printed microscope https://github.com/TadPath/PUMA
       | looks very interesting too.
        
       | nickparker wrote:
       | Fun old project but the technology has improved[0] since then.
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgQbPdiuUTw
        
         | Aurornis wrote:
         | Since you seem familiar with this space, are there any other
         | open source well documented projects that I could look at? The
         | nice part about OpenFlexure is the documentation and community.
         | Would be great if I could find another project going the same
         | direction, even if it's up and coming.
        
           | kwk1 wrote:
           | If I may jump in, here's a neat one:
           | 
           | https://www.braillerap.org/en/
        
       | abdullahkhalids wrote:
       | The core of a microscope are the lenses. For this, you are
       | required to buy three different ones [1]. One of these can be
       | acquired from Thorlabs for 65 USD [2].
       | 
       | How difficult would it be to build lenses of this quality "at
       | home"?
       | 
       | [1] https://build.openflexure.org/openflexure-
       | microscope/v7.0.0-...
       | 
       | [2] https://www.thorlabs.com/item/AC127-050-A
        
         | dekhn wrote:
         | It's not super practical to make objectives. While I suppose
         | it's technically possible, what you produce will almost
         | certainly be worse, more expensive, and more time-consuming.
         | 
         | $65 for a good lens is really not a huge amount of money; you
         | can also find slightly cheaper lenses (about $20 on
         | aliexpress).
         | 
         | To make a lens like this, you would have to buy a glass blank
         | of the right type (two, actually- a doublet is made of two
         | different types of glass), grind and polish them (very messy),
         | and then bond them and apply an antireflective coating. Getting
         | the lens geometry just right is very challenging. Or you can
         | just give Thorlabs $65 and focus (ha) on building a microscope
         | around it (I do this as a hobby; I'm sitting next to one of
         | those lenses right now).
         | 
         | However, folks do this, see http://www.microscopy-
         | uk.org.uk/mag/indexmag.html?http://www... but I can tell you
         | from the images that you could get the same results (better
         | really) with a $150 microscope (which also embeds many hundreds
         | of years of practical technology that make your experience
         | significantly better).
         | 
         | Also, if you're really keen on doing it yourself for
         | pedagogical reasons, then have at it, I just don't think it's
         | the best use of time.
        
       | dekhn wrote:
       | If you have a 3d printer, I think one of the most practical
       | things you can do is make UC2 cubes (or just buy them). It's
       | simpler to print, a bit more flexible, and a good introduction to
       | the various technologies.
        
       | augusteo wrote:
       | I don't work in hardware, but projects like this are inspiring.
       | Taking something expensive and specialized and making it
       | accessible with open designs.
       | 
       | The WHO recognition for low-resource settings is the kind of
       | impact that matters.
        
       | jacquesm wrote:
       | Amazing and possibly related:
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46771881
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-01-27 10:01 UTC)