[HN Gopher] MZI-based transistorlessness might finally be here
___________________________________________________________________
MZI-based transistorlessness might finally be here
Author : aniijbod
Score : 22 points
Date : 2026-04-14 19:37 UTC (3 days ago)
(HTM) web link (write.as)
(TXT) w3m dump (write.as)
| irickt wrote:
| An interesting and accessible article on the increased
| plausibility of photonic compute.
| refulgentis wrote:
| I get the "AI uses < 32 bit weights sometimes" thing, intimately,
| but I feel like I'm missing:
|
| A) Why that means calculations can be imprecise - the weights are
| data stored in RAM, is the idea we'd use > N-bit weights and say
| it's effectively N-bit due to imprecision, so we're good? Because
| that'd cancel out the advantage of using < N-bit weights. (which,
| of course, is fine if B) has a strong answer)
|
| B) A aside, why is photonics preferable?
| refulgentis wrote:
| "That's not a lab toy. That's a product-trajectory data point."
|
| sigh. (why? because now I have to guess how much is vague
| handwaving, or an AI trying to fit a square peg into a round
| hole, and how much is reality)
| LeroyRaz wrote:
| This reads like something AI generated...
| zitterbewegung wrote:
| This is something I always thought if you could make an Optical
| Computer using MZI or other technologies that don't have very
| "exact" requirements on computation. Similar to how LLMs right
| now where models are run on consumer devices like a Macbook Pro
| where we quantize to 4 bit computations you could hypothetically
| just run a larger model using MZI's doing inference on those
| systems.
|
| Since you are only changing the underlying model every so often
| instead of doing a large training loop when you setup the optical
| computer that can do inference it scales 2n+1 with clock speeds
| of to 100THz with only 100w of power vs traditional GPUs at 2GHZ
| with 1Kw for 15k cores.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2026-04-17 23:01 UTC)