[HN Gopher] Tesla reportedly developing new smaller, cheaper EV ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Tesla reportedly developing new smaller, cheaper EV after killing
       Model 2
        
       Author : jethronethro
       Score  : 20 points
       Date   : 2026-04-09 19:33 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (electrek.co)
 (TXT) w3m dump (electrek.co)
        
       | BonoboIO wrote:
       | Yeah ... vapoware like the roadster.
        
         | Morromist wrote:
         | I wouldn't be too shocked if they're real. They aren't going to
         | be making humanoid robots that actually are useful and don't
         | price 99% of people out of buying them and they have to come
         | out with something new eventually.
         | 
         | And they can copy a lot of features from the better, cheaper
         | chinese cars and just sell them for 3x as much in the american
         | market because they have no competition here and the chinese
         | are barred from selling their cars here.
         | 
         | Still, even if the are real it doesn't mean their company
         | should be valued at 21x Ford's value, or even 1x Ford's.
        
           | FireBeyond wrote:
           | I'd say they're as real as the $35K Cybertruck Musk promised
           | us (not that many of us wanted it).
        
             | Morromist wrote:
             | Exactly! That's a perfect analogy.
        
       | cyanydeez wrote:
       | Tesla is basically proof positive that the market, oligarchy and
       | fund managers are all in the Epstein-sphere of influence. No
       | rational market would suffer the type of business management and
       | products that Tesla produces.
        
         | quantified wrote:
         | You're forgetting a fan base. It's in the same category as a
         | meme stock or NFT back in the day. Same way that haters gonna
         | hate, believers gonna believe, and sometimes attack those who
         | question/threaten their worldview. The boosters boost because
         | they BELIEVE.
        
           | jfengel wrote:
           | I don't think the comparison is entirely fair. There was
           | never anything to NFTs. It was always a scam.
           | 
           | Tesla builds actual cars. For a while, these cars were
           | innovative, and the best of their class. Their price was
           | based on a wildly optimistic version of what they could
           | become, but at least it had some nonzero value.
           | 
           | It's true that they've stopped innovating and have fallen
           | behind, so that "optimism" has turned in the direction of
           | "pure delusion". But I still think it's unfair to compare it
           | to something that never demonstrated any value of any kind.
        
             | quantified wrote:
             | NFTs actually appreciated in price for a while. Still
             | waiting for our FSD Teslas to appreciate and be useful as
             | robotaxis as promised by Musk.
             | 
             | There is definitely a meme element here. It is fair to
             | compare anything to anything, just not to equate anything
             | with anything. There is, I think, sufficient overlap on
             | certain dimensions to warrant looking at them together.
        
         | cbeach wrote:
         | Your comment has more than a whiff of "never driven a Tesla"
        
       | tapoxi wrote:
       | It's a shame what happened to this company. I used to really want
       | a Tesla, but now the brand signifies your support for Musk/DOGE,
       | they killed half their lineup, and they keep mentioning that cars
       | aren't the future as they aim for driverless taxis and robots.
       | 
       | At least they opened the supercharger network. My mom picked up a
       | Cadillac Optiq and even with her being on the other side of the
       | country she was able to seamlessly transition to an EV.
        
         | verdverm wrote:
         | I was able to drive across the US in the winter in an Ioniq 6
         | without using Tesla chargers. All but a couple were 350V, WY
         | was the worst state (NY->WA), battery conditioning had charges
         | ~200V for the first phase until charge levels became the
         | dominant factor.
         | 
         | Ionna is 8 automakers building an alternative network
         | 
         | https://www.ionna.com/founding-partners/
         | 
         | Hyundai has their EV platform which has been 800V for a couple
         | of years, future proof for the lifetime of the car considering
         | how slow EV rollout is in the US...
        
           | Toutouxc wrote:
           | > All but a couple were 350V, WY was the worst state
           | (NY->WA), battery conditioning had charges ~200V for the
           | first phase until charge levels became the dominant factor.
           | 
           | Sorry but what? I can maybe understand "V" instead of "kW"
           | (why?), but what does the second part mean?
        
           | tapoxi wrote:
           | Yeah I've had an ID4 for a few years and its certainly
           | possible, but seemingly overnight the charging network
           | doubled and its a net win for everyone.
           | 
           | Also, my mom is in her 70s, those CCS plugs are huge! I'm
           | glad everyone was able to standardize on NACS.
        
         | 4ndrewl wrote:
         | It'll be a case study in years to come.
         | 
         | Dually turning the brand toxic to your core customers, and
         | having a bonfire of a strategy around products.
        
         | burnt-resistor wrote:
         | Absolutely waste but with insufficient accountability. I don't
         | understand how or why shareholders haven't sued him into
         | penury. Taking political positions as a business figure is
         | inherently fraught with risk, but then taking extreme political
         | positions, openly flaunting drug use, and suggesting human
         | decency is weakness is bloody weird and insane that will only
         | lead to hubris. I don't want to know a CEO's religion or
         | politics because these should be private matters.
        
           | the_biot wrote:
           | Because while Musk is certainly running Tesla into the
           | ground, without him it would sink even faster. Without his
           | hype jacking up the share price, it's just a carmaker with
           | 2.5 models, cratering sales, fast obsoleting tech, and no new
           | models in the near pipeline.
           | 
           | All the shareholders can do is hang on to the ride for as
           | long as they can.
        
         | dzhiurgis wrote:
         | I finally test drove friends BYD Sealion 7. Yes interior is
         | very nice, soft materials, etc (to a point where it almost
         | feels tacky). Drive felt much softer than my mid-gen Model Y
         | (almost too boaty and rolly but thats is completely fine for a
         | family car).
         | 
         | The software is not great tho, really misses the point and I
         | can see why people hate touchscreens. No single pedal driving
         | (idk perhaps they haven't enabled it), no phone as key, no
         | profiles, engine start/stop button.
         | 
         | Overall I'd say people are sold on features without looking in
         | depth what you get with Tesla. And Tesla still outselling any
         | other brand here in NZ.
         | 
         | Hope I can try out Zeekr 7x performance in couple of weeks. I
         | heard a lot of good things about it.
        
       | andrecarini wrote:
       | My impression as a driver-in-training is that people are too
       | complacent and forget they are handling a machine that could at
       | any moment kill and maim you, your loved ones and random innocent
       | bystanders. I wish we all were more responsible about it, and I
       | hate the Tesla philosophy of going the opposite way (the
       | touchscreen, the sorta there but not really autopilot, etc)
        
         | Toutouxc wrote:
         | That's also my impression (experienced and competent driver).
         | The other day I saw a video of someone testing Tesla FSD in
         | Prague (where I live), the person was praising it for dealing
         | with various situations quickly and with confidence, while I, a
         | local, was basically cowering non-stop in front of the screen.
         | There was certainly a lot of YOLO energy.
        
         | estimator7292 wrote:
         | The prevailing attitude in America is that as long as _you_ are
         | safe and comfortable in your gargantuan car, killing
         | pedestrians and other drivers doesn 't matter. Everyone else is
         | beneath your contempt and if someone gets hurt or killed due to
         | your recklessness, they deserve it.
        
         | dzhiurgis wrote:
         | Every new car has autopilot now, whats your point?
        
       | xnx wrote:
       | Original source:
       | https://finance.yahoo.com/sectors/technology/articles/exclus...
        
       | ramesh31 wrote:
       | It will still be $30k+ out the door, guaranteed. There's zero
       | interest in making an actual affordable car when their margins
       | are so high at that level.
        
         | jerlam wrote:
         | There are a lot of new $30K EVs on the market right now, as
         | manufacturers have added a lot of incentives since the EV
         | rebate expired. And a lot of slightly used EVs are coming off
         | lease this year.
         | 
         | Tesla is going to struggle since their brand no longer has any
         | cachet and people aren't interested in subscribing to a kinda-
         | self driving feature.
        
           | mullingitover wrote:
           | It's not that it doesn't have cachet, it has _anti-cachet_.
           | 
           | People of Musk's exact political stripe absolutely are not
           | impressed if you drive a Tesla, and everyone else, at
           | minimum, is silently counting it as a character flaw and
           | judgment problem.
           | 
           | To top it off, they're not the latest or the greatest EVs
           | available and it's common knowledge at this point. The two
           | metrics that they maximize, range and 0-60, are not really a
           | big factor in day-to-day ownership in the way that a smooth
           | ride and build quality are.
        
         | znkynz wrote:
         | Will be eaten alive by the chinese competitiors at that
         | ridicilous price point.
        
       | devonnull wrote:
       | File this under _I 'll believe it when I see it_.
        
       | microtherion wrote:
       | Quarterly earnings will be released April 22. My impression is
       | that in recent years, such rumors tended to cluster around
       | earnings reports (which largely haven't been great the last 2
       | years or so), presumably as distractions.
        
         | bdangubic wrote:
         | They don't really need this though, every TSLA investor already
         | louds that TSLA is _not_ a car company - I think now it is no
         | longer "Robo"taxi company either but humanoids-data-center-on-
         | Jupiter-moon-mining company. Hence, absolutely no need for any
         | EV announcements :)
        
       | klooney wrote:
       | I saw a Cybercab on the 280 today, it looked kind of cool but
       | kind of weird, too. I wonder if it'll be the same thing
       | physically.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-04-09 23:01 UTC)