[HN Gopher] The Future of Everything Is Lies, I Guess: Part 3 - ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Future of Everything Is Lies, I Guess: Part 3 - Culture
        
       Part 1 was discussed here: _ML promises to be profoundly weird_ -
       https: //news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47689648 - April 2026 (571
       comments)
        
       Author : aphyr
       Score  : 89 points
       Date   : 2026-04-09 13:33 UTC (9 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (aphyr.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (aphyr.com)
        
       | bfmalky wrote:
       | > Unavailable Due to the UK Online Safety Act
       | 
       | NSFW blog content on HN? Really?
        
         | timcobb wrote:
         | Woah you can't see this in the UK? Without age verification?
         | 
         | Update: there's a section called "Pornography". It does not
         | contain pornography.
        
           | pcdevils wrote:
           | It's not blocked By the UK, he's put a country filter on it
           | Like all the US sites that decided to block.the EU over gdpr
           | because turning off tracking was too much effort
        
             | embedding-shape wrote:
             | Work fine in Spain, so lets not jump on the all to typical
             | EU-made-the-internet-suck bandwagon all too quickly. Seems
             | this is a UK problem. But what do I know, I actually read
             | the error message.
        
               | andrewaylett wrote:
               | It's the author's problem with the UK (and the UK's
               | Online Safety Act, which establishes requirements on
               | hosts that can't be avoided by merely not being in the
               | UK), rather than the UK's problem with the author.
               | 
               | But as much as I dislike the OSA: if you're not subject
               | to UK law, why do you (website author) care what our
               | government thinks of your website? It's not like they can
               | do anything to you.
        
         | railgunmerlin wrote:
         | perhaps the safety filter is wrong instead of the post?
        
           | bitwize wrote:
           | Most likely it's a protest. Badplace passed Badlaw, so
           | residents of Badplace can't see my content, so nyah!
           | 
           | But, topics of a sexual nature--nothing really NSFW, just
           | mentions of various fetishes that online people have
           | developed and popularized, and the possibilities for AI to
           | realize those fetishes and potentially spawn new ones--are
           | discussed in the blog post, so it may be illegal to present
           | to minors under the OSA.
        
         | benrmatthews wrote:
         | https://archive.is/c3ggq
        
       | talkingtab wrote:
       | Our collective learned helplessness in the face of being
       | bombarded with advertising, propaganda and outright lies is just
       | astonishing to me. Not an article about fighting back, or doing
       | anything, just the resignation of a follower.
        
         | anigbrowl wrote:
         | There's a lot of people who are comfortable (socially or
         | professionally) with diagnosing and analyzing problems. Those
         | same people are often indifferent or outright hostile to people
         | proposing solutions, not least because solutions that brought
         | about change would make the analysts less relevant.
        
           | TheOtherHobbes wrote:
           | It's a hard problem because it reduces to the fact that
           | narcissists and sociopaths are a significant proportion of
           | the population, and they're strongly attracted to money,
           | power, attention, and status.
           | 
           | So even though they're a small minority they infest politics,
           | business, and the media, and create a culture in their own
           | image.
           | 
           | Most proposed solutions end up in superficial tribal
           | arguments about standard economic and political positions.
           | Not about the underlying issue, which cuts right across the
           | usual battle lines.
        
           | XorNot wrote:
           | Frankly, who are these people? Because this is just another
           | "they" idle conspiracy theory.
           | 
           | "They" are against me.
           | 
           | Ironically I could cite a very specific group this applies
           | to: fitness influencers in the wake of ozempic. "Natural
           | weight loss" and FUD about the drug took off when it hit
           | mainstream awareness because it really was a direct threat to
           | them. Of course this group also tends to heavily abuse other
           | drugs as they age out - because being a trim fitness
           | inflencer is easy in your 20s, keeping it going into your
           | mid-30s is a lot more difficult.
        
         | aspbee555 wrote:
         | reminds me of the college scene in the movie Tomorrowland where
         | all the teachers going on and on about about the things that
         | would end us and when she asked "Can we fix it?" and teacher is
         | like "What?" "I get things are bad but what can we do?"
         | 
         | learned helplessness is really a problem, but personally all I
         | have gotten is scorn and hatred for trying to make a
         | difference/improve things that I managed/had control of. All
         | people care about is precious number go up/ignoring the future
         | while everyone around me is looking at me like I have two heads
         | for not blindly following the insanity
         | 
         | what do we honestly do?
        
         | rdevilla wrote:
         | Ok. How do you propose one fights back? Do you really
         | viscerally understand what it is you are fighting against?
        
           | talkingtab wrote:
           | fork it. Fork the internet. How about that? We have this
           | stupid system built on people paying to target us. Is that
           | "the" internet or is it just one internet, and not a very
           | good one. This is supposed to be a place for hackers. So fork
           | the internet.
        
             | rdevilla wrote:
             | I mean, I've had pipe dreams of a parallel networking stack
             | built on IPv6 with a killer app offering real peer-to-peer
             | networking again. But who will deploy and maintain all the
             | new IPv6 networking gear, infrastructure, undersea cables?
             | This is not something within the purview of the average (or
             | even above average) hacker any more; the encumbents are too
             | firmly entrenched.
        
               | embedding-shape wrote:
               | Collectives, cooperatives and other organizations. It's
               | been done before, giant WiFi networks spanning countries.
               | Freifunk, Guifi and NYC Mesh are a few of them, the two
               | first are real and alive alternative networks built on
               | independent hardware infrastructure.
               | 
               | Not sure about the details with Freifunk, but Guifi has
               | collaborating companies who basically operate like ISPs
               | but connect you to Guifi + you get a internet connection
               | via the Guifi peering the installer helps you with.
        
               | talkingtab wrote:
               | Personally, I am guessing it is the other way around. Not
               | first killer app, but first a parallel networking stack,
               | etc.
               | 
               | The idea that anyone is too firmly entrenched is always
               | true. Until it is not. We are not still using horses, nor
               | casting bronze tools. Nor do most ships sail. We (mostly)
               | don't burn coal anymore. It would have been utterly
               | insane to imagine replacing any of those entrenched
               | technologies. That is the "follower" syndrome.
               | 
               | The context for a new kind of internet is very different
               | now, than when the internet started. That changed context
               | provides an opening for new ways to do things.
               | 
               | A crucial and hard piece is that it has to be paid for.
               | As much as you need a parallel networking stack you need
               | a parallel business model. Yes, the current one is too
               | firmly entrenched, etc.
        
               | dugidugout wrote:
               | I think Heidegger provides a framing for why these are
               | just musings in, as you put it, a firm entrenchment and
               | the whole ordeal is looking quite bleak. I honestly can't
               | imagine a way out of the technological frame and I am
               | simply not seeing my generation in common spaces. Even my
               | ability to meaningfully connect with my peers through
               | conversation is deteriorating by product of the sheer
               | scale of potential engagements one has at any moment. It
               | is quite overwhelming and I am afraid there is no
               | technological answer here.
        
             | david_shi wrote:
             | The application layer has way more gravity than the
             | networking one right now. You'd need to fork that for
             | anything to happen.
        
             | XorNot wrote:
             | But like...why?
             | 
             | This is basically "just don't use things you don't enjoy"
             | and the trouble of our time seems to be the number of
             | people who can't or won't do that.
             | 
             | It's somewhat an age thing but also definitely a lot of
             | people in all generations never learn it: you can just stop
             | using things. Walk away and suddenly find you never want to
             | look back, and if you do it's entirely unappealing.
        
         | groundzeros2015 wrote:
         | Unfortunately the political movements most interested in the
         | relationship between society and technology were wrapped up
         | with Nazis and so the line of thinking is underdeveloped, as it
         | has had to start again.
        
         | david_shi wrote:
         | What would you do? The system is very good at transmuting
         | critiques of it into its own propagation.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_for_Now
        
       | spaghetdefects wrote:
       | This has already happened with media for the past 100+ years.
       | We're shown what companies and governments want us to see. People
       | develop parasocial relationships with people they see on tv...
        
       | mzajc wrote:
       | > Authors, screenwriters, et al. have a new niche to explore. Any
       | day now I expect an A24 trailer featuring a villain who speaks in
       | the register of ChatGPT. "You're absolutely right, Kayleigh," it
       | intones. "I did drown little Tamothy, and I'm truly sorry about
       | that. Here's the breakdown of what happened..."
       | 
       | May I recommend _Pluribus_ (2025-)
        
         | underlipton wrote:
         | There's literally an ad for Amazon's Alexa devices that
         | features not just the gist of your example, but that specific
         | cause of death (which is itself predated by a murderous digital
         | intelligence doing the same thing in AMC's Pantheon series).
         | 
         | Guys I thought it was the fire next time.
        
         | satvikpendem wrote:
         | Also, the show Devs (2020), by Alex Garland. The joke is "Devs
         | Ex Machina", Ex Machina being another film of his.
        
           | throwanem wrote:
           | Eh. I enjoyed it enormously and I do likewise recommend it,
           | but its story isn't related to AI (either the concept of its
           | moment or the technology of ours) even slightly, nor trying
           | to be, or at least not in any way I saw. It was pretty open
           | with its themes, so I would expect that one to have been
           | pretty noticeable if it was present alongside the questions
           | of reality, artifice, grief, and simulationism with which the
           | miniseries does concern itself.
        
             | satvikpendem wrote:
             | You're right, not necessarily AI, more so what an
             | omniscient and omnipotent device could do especially in the
             | wrong hands.
        
               | observationist wrote:
               | What's the difference between the idle imaginings of a
               | god's mind and a universe scale simulation?
               | 
               | I always got advanced AI vibes from Devs, that it was a
               | mind interfacing with reality in some sort of weird
               | inception / simulation / manifestation way.
        
               | satvikpendem wrote:
               | In the show the device is not autonomous, humans use it.
        
               | observationist wrote:
               | That can be a type of mind, though? It can also be a type
               | of interface - a tap into a system not fully understood,
               | controlling the perspective or view but not the process.
               | The whole "mind of god" Deus/Devs, etc - I think it's
               | left ambiguous on purpose for the hook but I always took
               | it to be an AI flavored story at the core.
        
       | apsurd wrote:
       | Best line:
       | 
       | > I am concerned that ML systems could ruin our lives without
       | realizing anything at all.
       | 
       | It's hard to say it's not actively happening. And we don't even
       | know it, don't realize it? don't care?
       | 
       |  _(Claude Code got mandated at my work this week. Like literally
       | engineers must use CC.)_
        
         | rdevilla wrote:
         | > (Claude Code got mandated at my work this week. Like
         | literally engineers must use CC.)
         | 
         | I'm taking a break from this industry until the madness blows
         | over. I cannot even, anymore.
        
           | jspash wrote:
           | With the current direction of this industry, I fear you will
           | come back to something that is both unrecognisable and
           | terrifying.
        
             | gcheong wrote:
             | If there is anything left to come back to.
        
         | embedding-shape wrote:
         | > (Claude Code got mandated at my work this week. Like
         | literally engineers must use CC.)
         | 
         | As I haven't been a typical full-time employee in software
         | development for some time, could you possibly just like leak
         | the entire email where this was announced or something? (open
         | invitation to others who could too, if parent cannot) I'm very
         | curious to see how it was announced and what possible reasoning
         | they could have for that.
         | 
         | Don't get me wrong, I use agents for lots of coding too, but
         | forcing people to use tools they might not want to use doesn't
         | feel like the right way. I was also allowed to use vim whenever
         | I wanted for most of my career, something that feels more and
         | more rare when speaking with people just starting their careers
         | now.
        
           | apsurd wrote:
           | The official declaration came about in a team-meeting. We're
           | a tiny startup, 3 full-time eng with the CTO co-founder
           | driving the AI transformation. We have scheduled onboarding
           | meetings to get the entire company finding automation
           | opportunities with specifically Claude (CC, Cowork). For eng
           | specifically, there is "acknowledgement" that we all may have
           | different setups, but we should all be unifying our prompts,
           | strategies, pipelines, Agents, and so... it's CC. I still use
           | Cursor so I'm the only one not on CC; my eye-brow was
           | especially raised.
           | 
           | I don't want to be doxxed lol, so ironically I'll be sharing
           | in the sense that on one hand I am unsettled by the mandate,
           | on the other hand, for a tiny startup it's seems the state of
           | the industry, less so company specific.
           | 
           | Startups (think they) are in a fight for their life, so the
           | mandate comes from everyone contributing 10x or whatever. The
           | expectation is that agentic coding should 3x/5x/10x your
           | feature output, because that's how we're going to win.
           | 
           | I have many thoughts. But I'll focus on that last one: the
           | mandate is literally more features, more code, because it
           | gets us closer to winning. In my small engineering circles,
           | surprisingly, this is like the defacto stance. All things
           | considered, _might as well_ ship more code!
        
             | blipvert wrote:
             | I shall wait your collected thoughts. I'll suggest The
             | Mythical LLM Month as a title.
        
               | observationist wrote:
               | How about The Million Dollar Mythos Month Some of these
               | AI trends are starting to look more like gacha game
               | moneysinks than productivity tools.
        
           | seer wrote:
           | We did a similar Claude code mandate a few weeks ago.
           | 
           | Motivation was people being so allergic to tests and
           | automation, that making them use superpowers produced better
           | code, but also started adding a test pyramid.
           | 
           | The mandate was actually phrased in a way that you _must_
           | produce industry standard code, and if you struggle with it
           | you can use cc to bridge the gap.
           | 
           | Honestly I worry that this way devs will produce higher
           | quality code, but will not understand why, how to measure the
           | "quality" and steer towards it themselves.
           | 
           | At this point though the founders were pretty adamant with
           | the code quality and lack of tests so this seemed like a
           | reasonable way for the company, and I am curious to see how
           | such a mandate affects code, deliverables and individual's
           | knowledge.
           | 
           | So far it seems to be working as intended, but it is early
           | days.
        
         | add-sub-mul-div wrote:
         | > And we don't even know it, don't realize it? don't care?
         | 
         | People here are warning about this daily. And outside this tech
         | bubble full of people trying to profit from it, higher
         | percentages of people elsewhere do realize and do care.
        
           | apsurd wrote:
           | That's a good point. But I also think about the unprecedented
           | adoption of chatGPT. Global mass consumer adoption of all
           | ages, and people giddy about offloading their jobs to chatGPT
           | not connecting the very simple straight line to "you think
           | your boss is going to pay you to ask chatGPT?"
        
       | notpachet wrote:
       | > I can think of a few good myths for today's "AI". Searle's
       | Chinese room comes to mind, as does Chalmers' philosophical
       | zombie. Peter Watts' Blindsight draws on these concepts to ask
       | what happens when humans come into contact with unconscious
       | intelligence--I think the closest analogue for LLM behavior might
       | be Blindsight's Rorschach.
       | 
       | LLM's remind me of sprites, pixies, and the like, who are
       | situationally helpful but require constant supervision. We're
       | like modern magicians who learned how to summon these sorts of
       | spirits and bind them -- imperfectly -- to our will. But their
       | perception of truth and reality is "through the looking glass"
       | relative to our own. They aren't lying, from their own frame of
       | reference, even though what they say is untrue relative to ours.
        
         | rdevilla wrote:
         | Speaking of myths, pixies, and spirits:
         | 
         | > I. DEFINITION:
         | 
         | > MAGICK is the Science and Art of causing Change to occur in
         | conformity with Will.
         | 
         | > (Illustration: It is my Will to inform the World of certain
         | facts within my knowledge. I therefore take "magical weapons,"
         | pen, ink, and paper; I write "incantations"--these sentences--
         | in the "magical language" i.e. that which is understood by
         | people I wish to instruct.
         | 
         | > I call forth "spirits" such as printers, publishers,
         | booksellers, and so forth, and constrain them to convey my
         | message to those people. The composition and distribution is
         | thus an act of MAGICK by which I cause Changes to take place in
         | conformity with my Will.)
         | 
         | - Aleister Crowley, "Magick Without Tears," Chapter I, 1954.
         | https://hermetic.com/crowley/magick-without-tears/mwt_01
        
           | grehbies wrote:
           | Oil is the medium of time manipulation magic. Created through
           | ancient sacrificial rituals, it is is a substance that can be
           | used to create aging/rot-retarding barriers, or refined into
           | derivatives that increase the rate of plant growth and
           | mechanical work. To be handled with care, as extended contact
           | can lead to corruption of the body, as well as increased
           | susceptibility to fire elemental spells.            Simple
           | rituals can render an inferior product from most living
           | things; the time-manipulation abilities of such substances
           | will be weaker, but the substance will be safer to handle,
           | and can even be imbibed (this is a double-aged sword,
           | reducing one's vital life force while increasing one's bodily
           | proportions to that of a toddler).
           | 
           | -Me, "Early Morning Bed Thoughts", a few months ago.
        
             | rdevilla wrote:
             | You either see it or you don't.
        
             | throwanem wrote:
             | There's actually a useful and quite generic metaphor to be
             | excavated here. I would just tell you what it is, but I
             | think you'll more enjoy finding it for yourself.
        
           | AlotOfReading wrote:
           | A common definition anthropologists use for magic is occult
           | technology: a system of laws that can be manipulated to
           | create desired changes. There's a lot of value in thinking of
           | programming as a form of magic.
        
           | throwanem wrote:
           | Crowley is full of shit.
           | 
           | By this definition a hammer is a magical or "magickal"
           | implement - the K was Crowley's invention, so that he could
           | trademark it - which of course can be true if someone decides
           | as much, but the only reason to couch such trivia in the
           | pettifogging obscurity Crowley favored is because doing so
           | will help you nail bored young socialites, an activity which
           | Crowley _also_ famously favored. (Gotta watch out for that
           | neurosyphilis! What a shame he never did.)
           | 
           | Try thinking for yourself, instead.
        
             | WJW wrote:
             | For sure. Despite all the talking about "self-deification"
             | and all that shit, they sure seem to care a lot about what
             | society (and their imaginary demons) think about them.
        
             | notpachet wrote:
             | > pettifogging
             | 
             | Off-topic but just wanted to thank you for teaching me a
             | new word. I try to always reply to HN comments that expand
             | my vocabulary.
        
               | Slow_Hand wrote:
               | Nice word.
               | 
               | I rue the day the IG reels crowd pick up on it and it
               | becomes the "word du jour" that gets overused to the
               | point of being intolerable. Right up there with
               | "narcissist" and "gaslighting".
        
               | sunrunner wrote:
               | Is pettifogging some kind of etymological parent of
               | bikeshedding then?
        
           | WJW wrote:
           | A definition by which every human alive ever qualifies as a
           | magician, and which is therefore not very useful as a
           | distinction.
        
             | throwanem wrote:
             | If you called him on it he would say that was on purpose,
             | then talk your ears off about how. He was a ferociously
             | effective charlatan, which is why people still remember the
             | name he made up for himself. (And even invented a rhyming
             | couplet to prate as a pronunciation guide!)
        
               | rdevilla wrote:
               | You are delusional.
        
               | dugidugout wrote:
               | These don't sound like convincing indicators of being an
               | "effective charlatan". Am I to see the Notorious B.I.G.
               | in the same frame?
        
             | rdevilla wrote:
             | > A definition by which every human alive ever qualifies as
             | a magician
             | 
             | Exactly correct.
             | 
             | Chapter 2: "No, every act of your life is a magical act;
             | whenever from ignorance, carelessness, clumsiness or what
             | not, you come short of perfect artistic success, you
             | inevitably register failure, discomfort, frustration. [...]
             | Why should you study and practice Magick? Because you can't
             | help doing it, and you had better do it well than badly."
        
       | julianeon wrote:
       | If fear is the mind-killer, then sexy chatbots are the libido-
       | killer, for me. Hard no.
        
       | _doctor_love wrote:
       | If 'aphyr is reading comments here, I'm curious: have you read
       | Joseph Weizenbaum?
        
         | aphyr wrote:
         | I read a fair bit about Eliza when I was young, but I don't
         | recall if any of those were from Weizenbaum himself!
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-04-09 23:00 UTC)