[HN Gopher] A truck driver spent 20 years making a scale model o...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       A truck driver spent 20 years making a scale model of every
       building in NYC
        
       Author : 1659447091
       Score  : 210 points
       Date   : 2026-04-06 05:22 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.smithsonianmag.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.smithsonianmag.com)
        
       | tombert wrote:
       | Looks like you can buy tickets:
       | https://35948.blackbaudhosting.com/35948/page.aspx?pid=196&t...
       | 
       | I should check it out, it would be fun to see my house recreated
       | as a model.
       | 
       | I love projects like this; no delusions of trying to change the
       | world, just doing it because the creator thinks it would be cool
       | to do.
        
       | hermitcrab wrote:
       | Brilliant. Stay weird, humans.
        
       | llmslave wrote:
       | We need people like this around
        
       | contubernio wrote:
       | Why is it relevant what he does for a living? It's his passion
       | and hobby that is interesting.
        
         | bell-cot wrote:
         | > Why is it relevant...
         | 
         | I'd say the point is "An Ordinary Guy did X". Vs. an
         | engineering genius, or somebody with deep pockets, or a
         | Hollywood special effects model builder, or 3D printer junkie,
         | or whatever.
        
           | josfredo wrote:
           | He is with certainty not ordinary, precisely because of the
           | feat. So a "an ordinary guy did x" statement would be false.
        
             | bell-cot wrote:
             | The point is that he came to the table with "ordinary"
             | talents, equipment, skills, financial resources, etc.
             | 
             | That he had to get extremely focused on the task, and
             | devote years to it, is pretty well spelled out in the
             | article's title.
        
             | gremlinunderway wrote:
             | Jesus christ this is pedantic. You do understand that not
             | all statements can be universally distilled to true or
             | false right? That there's nuance and opinion here right?
        
       | billfor wrote:
       | Also for comparison:
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panorama_of_the_City_of_New_Yo...
        
         | drakythe wrote:
         | 1:1,200 scale vs 1:2,400 scale, or 9,335 square feet vs 1350
         | square feet.
         | 
         | Both are absolutely incredible. I find the growth in size
         | numbers difficult to really comprehend even though the scale
         | difference is an "easy" * 2. I wish I wasn't so so bad at
         | visualizing things.
        
       | philipallstar wrote:
       | > "We were all standing around squealing, 'Look, there's our
       | museum!' 'There's the Met; there's the Guggenheim,'" Sherman
       | recalls. "It's this great act of recognition, and then it's also
       | witnessing [Macken's] creativity, how he made this complex
       | architecture out of very humble materials."
       | 
       | Blue collar, dedicated, skillful effort over decades immediately
       | co-opted by nonsense-spewer.
        
         | avidruntime wrote:
         | co-opted? The last paragraph of the article suggests this was
         | quite literally the artist's goal:
         | 
         | > "One of the reasons Joe is so insistent that every single
         | building is here is because he would never want someone to come
         | and see it and not be able to find where they live and see
         | their story," Sherman tells Artnet.
         | 
         | Its not like they broke into his shop and shared his model with
         | the world before he could, it is currently an exhibition at the
         | Museum of the City of New York.
        
           | krustyburger wrote:
           | Nor is it nonsense to acknowledge how cool it is to recognize
           | your own building or that he was able to accomplish the
           | project without expensive materials. Spew is also quite the
           | verb to use. What an all-around unpleasant comment.
        
           | philipallstar wrote:
           | > co-opted? The last paragraph of the article suggests this
           | was quite literally the artist's goal:
           | 
           | Unless the person quite literally lives in that museum, I
           | don't think "quite literally" is in any way accurate.
           | 
           | > Its not like they broke into his shop and shared his model
           | with the world before he could, it is currently an exhibition
           | at the Museum of the City of New York.
           | 
           | I'm not saying they did. I'm saying what they said was a load
           | of rubbish.
        
             | drakythe wrote:
             | > I'm not saying they did. I'm saying what they said was a
             | load of rubbish.
             | 
             | I disagree. Employees often take some form of "ownership"
             | over their buildings, especially in long term and public
             | education facing facilities like museums. It isn't
             | difficult to understand why they said "there is our
             | museum". Human language connotes ideas as often as it does
             | specifics, and there is nothing rubbish about that.
        
       | Nevermark wrote:
       | How long before we can build tiny controlled cars and little tiny
       | "pole people" that wander around?
       | 
       | Micro-machines seem to be taking their time.
        
       | tejohnso wrote:
       | Looking at the level of detail, and the thoroughness, I wouldn't
       | have expected it to even be possible to complete it in 20 years.
       | How much time does this guy spend driving truck? Amazing
       | accomplishment and display of dedication and creativity.
        
         | Carrok wrote:
         | "We overestimate what we can achieve in a day, and
         | underestimate what we can achieve in a year."
        
           | esafak wrote:
           | Your sibling post estimated it pretty well :)
        
         | drakythe wrote:
         | 20 * 365.25 = 7305 days. Assuming their "near a million
         | buildings" number tracks to somewhere around 950,000, he would
         | have had to build 130 "structures" a day on average.
         | 
         | This is all round and not precise numbers, considering he had
         | to have days where he couldn't build, I'm guessing on the
         | number of structures, and he started in 2004 (22 years ago),
         | accuracy is not possible. But still, even if we fudged it down
         | to 100 structures a day: This is BONKERS.
         | 
         | The man has a prodigious skill at building simple models and
         | painting them. I am incredibly impressed. And I am curious if
         | he did it all alone or if he ever had help from friends/family,
         | even just simple cutting of the balsa wood into simple
         | templated shapes for him to later construct. (To be clear, even
         | if he had help it takes nothing away from how impressive this
         | is)
        
       | bigwheels wrote:
       | Previous related discussion:
       | 
       |  _Trucker built a scale model of NYC over 21 years_
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45261877 - 18 comments, 6
       | months ago
        
       | mckn1ght wrote:
       | Any way to know how many buildings were demolished and a newer
       | one built in its place over that 20 year period? Wonder what he
       | used for a reference. Is the model representative of a single
       | moment in time, or is there some clock drift?
        
       | lkm0 wrote:
       | A swiss architect did the same in the mid 19th century with
       | Geneva, specifically to preserve an image of the city right
       | before the entirety of the city walls were to be razed
       | 
       | pics: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Relief_Magnin
        
       | layman51 wrote:
       | This is kind of timely for me because very recently I had heard
       | of the film "Synecdoche, New York", but in this film, the scale
       | model is more life-size.
        
         | wincy wrote:
         | A little off topic, but any time I see that word, it reminds me
         | of the first time I read the word "synechdoche", I wanted to
         | know how to pronounce it and watched a very helpful YouTube
         | video [0] three times before realizing someone had pulled a
         | very funny prank from an earlier, less serious time on YouTube.
         | I laughed and laughed.
         | 
         | [0] https://youtu.be/v-n1vGeVIXo
        
       | keeganpoppen wrote:
       | i absolutely love the sentiment from this closing sentence:
       | 
       | > "One of the reasons Joe is so insistent that every single
       | building is here is because he would never want someone to come
       | and see it and not be able to find where they live and see their
       | story," Sherman tells Artnet.
        
       | PhilippGille wrote:
       | If you are interested in scale models of New York, there's a 1:1
       | scale model in Minecraft: https://youtu.be/ZouSJWXFBPk
        
         | bigweeble wrote:
         | Whoa. I admire the time and dedication to both models. However,
         | I can't help but LOVE the minecraft model since it will live
         | on. Now we just need to 3D print the minecraft model :D
        
       | rkuska wrote:
       | There is a miniature of Prague from around 1830 by Antonin
       | Langweil. He dedicated his all free time to finish it in a hope
       | of making money for his daughters. Langweil never found a
       | benefactor for his work and he died poor. Pretty tragic story.
       | 
       | https://www.muzeumprahy.cz/en/visit-langweils-model-of-pragu...
        
         | omnimus wrote:
         | Unfortunately the museum itself is pretty lame. I don't
         | recommend.
        
         | mcjiggerlog wrote:
         | There's one of Madrid that also dates to 1830 that is insanely
         | impressive, too:
         | 
         | https://www.madrid.es/UnidadesDescentralizadas/UDCMedios/not...
        
         | AgentMatt wrote:
         | His last name sounds very close to the German word for boredom
         | (Langeweile), that's kind of funny...
        
       | c7b wrote:
       | Awe-inspring. But one thing I don't get: he says he wants every
       | building to be included, but the buildings in NYC are anything
       | but permanent. Did he pick a particular timestamp for everything,
       | or is it a mosaic of different epochs? Keeping the model up to
       | date would be even more insane.
        
         | 1659447091 wrote:
         | > he wants every building to be included, but the buildings in
         | NYC are anything but permanent
         | 
         | I think he took creative liberties there. The Twin Towers and
         | One World Trade Center are included; he started the project in
         | ~2004
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-04-07 23:00 UTC)