[HN Gopher] Congress Became the Weakest Branch
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Congress Became the Weakest Branch
        
       Author : marojejian
       Score  : 9 points
       Date   : 2026-04-04 19:43 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.aei.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.aei.org)
        
       | marojejian wrote:
       | Read this as part of my effort to understand this question. Seems
       | like a good overview. while the solutions proposed seems good,
       | they also appear to small/tactical
        
         | verdverm wrote:
         | Jon Stewart's podcast with Heather Cox Richardson this last
         | week is similarly good input for thinking about these things.
        
       | salawat wrote:
       | If they wouldn't have shut down the Office of Technology
       | Assessment, legislators may actually have research collated
       | that's more free of bias than whatever it is that the lobbyists
       | vomit all over them, but we can't have nice things. Fucking
       | Gingrich.
        
       | fasterik wrote:
       | I've felt increasingly politically homeless over the past few
       | years. Neither major party appears to care about the two largest
       | problems facing the U.S.: the national debt, and the inability of
       | Congress to assert the powers delegated to it by the
       | Constitution. Though the problems become obvious to one party
       | while the other is in power, they end up doing nothing about it
       | when the pendulum swings back.
       | 
       | Getting rid of the filibuster, adding more seats to the House,
       | and states adopting some form of ranked choice voting, would be a
       | good start. Ultimately we will need a broader cultural shift back
       | to the values of the Founders: rule of law, federalism, and
       | limited government. Unfortunately with the rise of populism on
       | the right and left, it doesn't seem like we are headed in the
       | right direction.
        
         | JumpCrisscross wrote:
         | > _Neither major party appears to care about the two largest
         | problems facing the U.S._
         | 
         | Forget about national politics and parties. Focus on the races
         | in front of you. Irrespective of consequence. Local, primary,
         | pre-primary informal caucusing, _et cetera_. It's tedious. But
         | there is a shocking amount of power that even small amounts of
         | civic engagement away from general elections brings.
         | 
         | Unless the only issues you care about are hot button, there is
         | a good chance you can individually sway policy outcomes in a
         | meaningful way. (I have.)
        
         | Arodex wrote:
         | If you honestly think think both sides are "abusing the same
         | power", you clearly are oblivious.
         | 
         | Which your proposal to abolish the filibuster further proves:
         | it would make governing even more a "winner-takes-all" game. Or
         | ranked choice voting: you can't even stop Republicans from
         | gerrymandering. (And no, gerrymandering is not done by "both
         | sides". California did it as reprisal and put provisions to get
         | back to a fair system when Republicans stop gerrymandering. And
         | gerrymandering is the official strategy of the GOP from bottom
         | to top.)
        
           | fasterik wrote:
           | Your quote "abusing the same power" appears nowhere in my
           | post. I am saying that neither Democrats nor Republicans,
           | when they get into power, do anything to bring the deficit
           | down to 3% of GDP as is recommended by economists, or to
           | constrain the military actions and executive orders of the
           | President on their side. I'm not making a "both sides are
           | equally bad" argument, I'm saying that neither side is doing
           | what it would take to fix the problem.
           | 
           | I'm willing to go either way on the fillibuster; that was
           | just one example which the article talks about. In
           | particular, they talk about filibuster reform rather than
           | abolishing it, so I may have worded it too strongly in my
           | original post. Still, I think there's a legitimate argument
           | that the increase in use of the filibuster over the past few
           | decades has had the practical consequence of delegating
           | legislative power to the Executive branch.
        
       | JumpCrisscross wrote:
       | The first sentence of Article II is "the executive Power shall be
       | vested in a President of the United States of America" [1].
       | 
       | That should be changed to "the President shall execute the laws
       | of the United States of America." Rule of law.
       | 
       | (My other pet Article II amendment is striking "and he shall have
       | Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the
       | United States, except in Cases of Impeachment" from SS 2 and
       | switching to direct election for the President.)
       | 
       | [1] https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-2/
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-04-04 23:02 UTC)