[HN Gopher] Automatic Textbook Formalization
___________________________________________________________________
Automatic Textbook Formalization
Author : tzury
Score : 21 points
Date : 2026-04-03 20:13 UTC (2 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (github.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (github.com)
| tzury wrote:
| More details:
| https://x.com/FabianGloeckle/status/2040082785851904401
| mkl wrote:
| That just shows the first post for most people. Here is all of
| it:
| https://xcancel.com/FabianGloeckle/status/204008278585190440...
| alex_be wrote:
| Big step toward AI-assisted mathematical research
| auggierose wrote:
| Which LLMs do these agents use?
| auggierose wrote:
| Claude Opus 4.5
| measurablefunc wrote:
| This is a lot of useful data for the next iteration of Claude
| because not only does Anthropic have the final artifacts but they
| also saw the entire workflow from start to finish & Facebook paid
| them for the privilege of giving them all of that training data.
| smj-edison wrote:
| It's interesting to see a lot of formalized proofs gather around
| Lean (specifically Mathlib). I've in a formal math class right
| now, so it's a bit weird learning ZFC while messing around with
| Lean, which is based on dependant types.
|
| There's a lot of other proof assistants out there, like Mizar,
| Isabelle, Metamath, Metamath0, and Coq, each based on different
| foundations. Metamath0 in particular looks really intriguing,
| since it's the brainchild of Mario Carneiro, who was also the
| person who started Mathlib (and I believe is still an active
| contributor).
|
| Anyways, Lean definitely has a lot going for it, but I love to
| tinker, and it's interesting to see other proof assistants' takes
| on things.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2026-04-03 23:00 UTC)