[HN Gopher] Midnight train from GA: A view of America from the t...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Midnight train from GA: A view of America from the tracks as
       airports struggle
        
       Author : walterbell
       Score  : 51 points
       Date   : 2026-03-29 20:00 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (isp.netscape.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (isp.netscape.com)
        
       | homeonthemtn wrote:
       | Whoa, forget the train, folks check out this website. This is
       | active??
        
         | noer wrote:
         | My first reaction when I saw the domain
        
           | riffic wrote:
           | AOL Media LLC
           | 
           | more info here: https://hackaday.com/2026/01/27/zombie-
           | netscape-wont-die/
        
         | QuantumNomad_ wrote:
         | See also https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565264
        
         | PostOnce wrote:
         | Active and _beautiful_ , I can start reading without having to
         | scroll down, which I have to do on the AP site.
         | 
         | I miss when the web looked like this, and pages were documents
         | instead of applications.
         | 
         | We built the wrong web, we needed two, one for documents, and
         | one for applications, but we built this rube goldberg
         | contraption instead.
        
         | fHr wrote:
         | True :D
        
       | shagie wrote:
       | The regular site (rather than aggregator):
       | https://apnews.com/article/airports-shutdown-long-lines-trai...
       | 
       | This also includes some images that aren't part of the
       | netscape.com version... which is probably part of the point of
       | it: "A view of America from the tracks" has some pictures of
       | Amtrak stations and Virginia countryside.
       | 
       | (and for some nostalgia- City of New Orleans by Steve Goodman
       | https://youtu.be/fhHxNMyw0dI )
        
       | dylan604 wrote:
       | Delta has round trip flights from ATL->WAS for ~$800
       | 
       | TFA train round trip shows $306 without a private cabin.
       | 
       | TFA already mentioned the time differences.
       | 
       | The googs says it's 638miles doable in 9.5hours. Say an average
       | of 20mpg at $4/gal (I have no idea what current rates are in that
       | part of the country) needs 32gals for $128 one way or $256 to
       | come back. Of course someone needs to drive it.
       | 
       | The train definitely looks like a decent deal for this route.
       | I've priced train rides from my town, and prices look like plane
       | routes but in days instead of hours. The train doesn't make sense
       | all of the time, but I'm holding out hope I'll find a trip where
       | it will make sense.
        
         | hdgvhicv wrote:
         | Based on the last long trip I did in the U.K. where I averaged
         | 43 miles per US gallon (52mpg) I'm shocked how terrible
         | efficiency is in the US. That's real world highway driving in a
         | 4 year old petrol car.
        
           | dylan604 wrote:
           | I deliberately chose a low mpg value. Most people are driving
           | SUVs what I assumed 20mpg would be safe. My car averages
           | about 26mpg. I have no insight into how many kilometers per
           | liter UK cars get, but the translated PS/litre to $/gallon
           | has always shocked me at the price paid on that side of the
           | pond. If Americans had to to pay the same rate, we'd have
           | better mpg ratings as well.
        
             | hdgvhicv wrote:
             | I paid PS1.45 a litre on Friday my average, which I tend to
             | treat as about 14p a mile or 18c a mile.
             | 
             | I'm not sure why I'd deliberately burn more fuel regardless
             | of the price. Literally setting fire to cash for nothing.
             | 
             | That would be $120 for your trip to Georgia, about the same
             | price as in the US despite fuel being $7.30 a gallon
             | equivalent in the uk.
        
               | dylan604 wrote:
               | I don't know where you're coming with deliberately here
               | as if that's something I chose. I'm not familiar with
               | cars getting 43mpg in the US. Maybe some hybrid, but
               | that's definitely not the norm on this side of the pond.
               | Even when I had a Corolla, which was the highest rated
               | car I've ever driven, did not get 43mpg.
               | 
               | Your "deliberate" sounds a lot like victim blaming here.
        
             | tzs wrote:
             | That's way too pessimistic.
             | 
             | Among SUV drivers in the US the biggest segment is compact
             | SUVs (think Toyota RAV4 or Honda CR-V). Then midsize (like
             | Toyota Highlander or Hyundai Palisade), subcompact (Mazda
             | CX-30, Hyundai Kona), then full sized (Chevy Tahoe, Ford
             | Expedition).
             | 
             | RAV4 non-hybrid is around 35 mpg highway. CR-V 34 mpg
             | highway.
             | 
             | In midsize, Highlander is 29 mpg highway, and Palisade is
             | 25 mpg highway.
             | 
             | In subcompact CX-30 is 30-33 mpg highway depending on
             | options. Kona is 29-34 mpg highway depending on options.
             | 
             | The full size category, which does get down to around 20
             | mpg, is only around 3-4% of SUVs in the US. Tahoe is 20 mpg
             | highway. Expedition gets 23 mpg highway.
        
               | dylan604 wrote:
               | Great, but it's still 9.5 hours of time on the wheel.
               | Train/plane eliminates that. So even if it is 1/3 cheaper
               | in fuel, it's something that needs to be considered.
        
               | Arainach wrote:
               | > RAV4 non-hybrid is around 35 mpg highway. CR-V 34 mpg
               | highway.
               | 
               | ....35mpg at 60mph and little traffic, maybe. I can't
               | speak for that specific model, but most vehicles I've
               | driven do significantly worse than advertised.
               | 
               | My Subaru Legacy advertised 27 City, 35 Highway, 30
               | Combined. In practice I average 25-26 while commuting and
               | on extended highways drives more like 29, still on stock
               | tires.
        
         | uyzstvqs wrote:
         | What? I can book ATL <-> WAS round trip for $74 with Frontier,
         | $184 with Delta. With a checked bag $168-254.
        
           | dylan604 wrote:
           | <shrug> it's what my look up specifically for this comment
           | gave me using Delta's website. I tried booking for 3/30 -
           | 4/02 roundtrip. I went with Delta as that was specifically
           | called out in TFA. Deliberately limiting the variables.
           | Besides, I'd be in a really desperate situation to choose
           | Frontier.
        
         | Helithumper wrote:
         | Like other commenters I was also confused at the "~$800"
         | comment.
         | 
         | I tried this myself, picking a time a few weeks in the future
         | (round trip April 15th to 22nd). Round trip as I'm assuming
         | you'll want to go there and come home.
         | 
         | All of the following info is for ATL to Washington-Area
         | airports (BWI, DCA, IAD). Amtrak is for Atlanta to Washington
         | Union Station
         | 
         | Delta (20+ nonstop a day every 30min or so, ~2hrs flight time):
         | 
         | - ~$244->$304 Main
         | 
         | - ~$444->$504 Comfort+
         | 
         | - ~$769-$974 First
         | 
         | Amtrak (11:29PM->1:47PM, 14h18m):
         | 
         | - $356 Coach
         | 
         | - $1107 Private Room (Roomette)
         | 
         | I'm sure that a more accurate analysis would include a spread
         | of days.
         | 
         | In general, this means that with the train you'd increase your
         | travel time by ~26 hours round trip (over a whole day) while
         | also paying ~$112 more.
         | 
         | (Note that the Amtrak website prices each leg independently
         | while Delta prices round trip, I made sure to go all the way to
         | the cart to gather the end pricing)
         | 
         | I was curious so I also did a trip much sooner (March 30th to
         | April 6th):
         | 
         | Delta:
         | 
         | - $616-$665 Main
         | 
         | - $785-$800 Comfort Plus
         | 
         | - $1065 First (they were all priced the same)
         | 
         | Amtrak:
         | 
         | - $517 Main
         | 
         | - $1369 Private Room (Roomette)
         | 
         | So for a much sooner trip you do save ~$100 for the tradeoff of
         | ~26 hours more time spent.
         | 
         | It's also worth noting that this route's travel occurs
         | primarily at night, in the dark. This means both trying to
         | sleep on a train as well as not being able to see much outside
         | as it'll be dark most of the ride.
        
       | superultra wrote:
       | I've taken this line - as many have and do all the time. Ride it
       | once and you'll realize why it's the better way to travel in
       | every way but cost and time - and both of those are a result of
       | the United State unwillingness to fully fund something like
       | Amtrak.
       | 
       | As the author states traveling by train just a more pleasant
       | experience.
       | 
       | I should note that even though there is technically wifi on every
       | Amtrak train, it's cellular based. You'll find that at least from
       | atlanta to NY, the train somehow threads the needle between
       | cellular ranges. Both your phone and of course the train will
       | often be either out of range of fast cellular service or out of
       | range altogether. Supposedly Amtrak is getting starlink but we'll
       | see. So, don't expect to be getting on any video calls.
        
         | standardUser wrote:
         | Years ago I tried to book a train from San Francisco to Chicago
         | as part of a trip I had planned but found it to be more
         | expensive and, more significantly, a _multi-day journey_
         | instead of a few hours. If you happen to be an American living
         | near one of the useful passenger rail lines, and desire to go
         | to one of the few destinations it can take you to quickly and
         | affordably, more power to you. But most Americans live nowhere
         | near a useful rail system.
        
           | JKCalhoun wrote:
           | Taking days to get to Chicago from Emeryville is all part of
           | the fun of it. Enjoy the journey...
        
             | standardUser wrote:
             | Spoken like one of the small percentage of Americans who
             | can afford to tag on extra days to their PTO to enjoy a
             | nice view.
        
               | JKCalhoun wrote:
               | I guess so. We took the girls when they were young to
               | Omaha a few times from the Bay Area. I wasn't even sure
               | passenger trains would be around when they were adults so
               | wanted to give them that experience. I took a train
               | between CKansas City and Chicago as a kid and found it
               | magical.
               | 
               | So, yeah, the train ride was actually a significant part
               | of the experience for those particular vacations.
        
         | aziaziazi wrote:
         | I'm curious if a classic starlings antenna works at 100-300
         | km/h with occasional rotation, or will it need to be mounted on
         | a targeting motor on top of the train?
        
           | hdgvhicv wrote:
           | Works on planes at 1000km/h so should be fine on trains in
           | the open countryside (not in tunnels of course)
        
         | goalieca wrote:
         | > and both of those are a result of the United State
         | unwillingness to fully fund something like Amtrak.
         | 
         | What kind of funding are we looking at? Is the issue that this
         | is cost-prohibitive for reasons of scale that make this non-
         | competitive for businesses themselves to fund as compared to
         | elsewhere?
        
           | supertrope wrote:
           | Amtrak was created to preserve the last vestiges of passenger
           | rail when private businesses pulled out. It has conflicting
           | missions so it's never going to be competitive in service.
           | 
           | Amtrak does not own its own rail network. It has priority
           | over cargo trains de jure but in practice cargo takes
           | priority. Many areas only have one set of tracks and trains
           | can only pull over onto sidings when they exist. Class 1
           | railroads are capital intensive so to be more profitable they
           | don't spend any money they don't have to. Such as more
           | sidings, more train yards, not maximizing the length of
           | trains so they fit onto those sidings, or more than one
           | operator per train. Class 1 railroads are focused on cargo
           | and making money, not helping Amtrak trains go first. The
           | government doesn't care to enforce the law either.
           | https://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-13/tracking-
           | productivity...
           | 
           | Amtrak operates routes that suffer from low demand instead of
           | focusing on the New York Washington DC route. It's about
           | counting US Senate votes as much as customer satisfaction or
           | breaking even.
           | 
           | The Federal government heavily subsidized cars starting in
           | the 1950s through the Interstate Highway System. Cars and
           | airliners are considered critical passenger transportation
           | infrastructure, trains are not.
        
       | adjejmxbdjdn wrote:
       | > The train is still longer, and time is money, we are taught.
       | But certainty has value, too, even if it means at 11:29 p.m.
       | departure.
       | 
       | Unfortunately this is misleading. Outside of the Northeast Acela
       | corridor, there is no certainty in train travel in the U.S..
       | 
       | Although legally passenger trains are now supposed to have right
       | of way over freight trains, in practice that's just not the case.
       | So a 14.5 hr train journey can easily be delayed by several
       | hours.
        
         | GenerWork wrote:
         | I believe Brightline in Florida has ownership of its tracks
         | from Cocoa to Orlando.
        
           | bryananderson wrote:
           | It does not, but it has a sane scheduling agreement with the
           | railroad which the railroad actually respects.
           | 
           | This is a common misconception because Brightline's parent
           | company Florida East Coast Industries shares heritage with
           | Florida East Coast Railway, but the companies were split in
           | 2007.
        
         | xvedejas wrote:
         | A couple of the lines I ride in California have decent on-time
         | rates (mostly I ride the line formerly known as the San
         | Joaquins)
        
         | jeffbee wrote:
         | Haha hours. There is no upper bound. The average Amtrak delay
         | on Norfolk Southern is 19 minutes per 100 miles. And the worst
         | cases are all horror stories. A freight operator sidetracks
         | Amtrak while a miles-long coal train rolls through at a jogging
         | pace. The coal train breaks down. The Amtrak crew can't legally
         | operate any more because of federal time limits. You are 1000
         | miles from a city in the middle of nowhere and by the time they
         | dispatch another crew to your train you've been surviving on
         | Fritos for days.
        
         | Loughla wrote:
         | So I took a consulting job in a small town in Illinois called
         | Quincy. I couldn't fly there without connecting in St. Louis,
         | but I could take the train from Chicago. It was billed at 6
         | hours.
         | 
         | It absolutely left on time but had to wait for three freight
         | trains on the way. 9 hours later we got to the "station". One
         | of the other passengers said that their previous trip was
         | cancelled and Amtrak bought everyone bus tickets.
         | 
         | In the Midwest, there are no guarantees with trains other than
         | you'll get there. Eventually.
        
         | vl wrote:
         | Delays? What if you can't buy tickets at all.
         | 
         | I was looking at Tucson to Seattle trip on a relatively short
         | notice - all sleeping tickets were sold out multiple weeks in
         | advance. And due to the length of the trip it's not practical
         | with non-sleeping seat.
        
       | ChrisArchitect wrote:
       | If you were trying to highlight the Netscape ISP site OP, thread
       | here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565264
        
         | walterbell wrote:
         | Story _discovered_ via usability of that site. Will use it
         | more.
        
       | axpy906 wrote:
       | " That is what drew Gen. William Tecumseh Sherman for one of the
       | Civil War's seminal campaigns that helped defeat the
       | Confederacy."
       | 
       | To be clear Sherman burned it to the ground which is why it got
       | renamed Atlanta.
        
       | Reason077 wrote:
       | > _"... booked the train overnight and into game day across a
       | 650-mile route ... A 141/2-hour weekend train ride"_
       | 
       | Just by way of comparison, in China the 819-mile train route
       | between Beijing and Shanghai takes 4.5 hours.
        
       | plagiarist wrote:
       | I wish we had high speed rail. Rail travel is actually pleasant.
       | Air travel is a godawful nightmare that is somehow worse every
       | single year.
        
       | ghaff wrote:
       | I'm hoping it won't be necessary but, if TSA is fundamentally
       | broken with an international transfer through Dulles I will
       | seriously consider taking the train from a union Station to
       | Boston.
       | 
       | Honestly surprised how many TSA people are still working without
       | pay. I wouldn't in their shoes. Maybe if TSA just basically
       | shutdown commercial aviation in the US it would lead to some
       | progress.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-03-29 23:00 UTC)