[HN Gopher] Observations from carbon dioxide monitoring
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Observations from carbon dioxide monitoring
        
       Author : coloneltcb
       Score  : 37 points
       Date   : 2026-03-27 12:56 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (grieve-smith.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (grieve-smith.com)
        
       | jmclnx wrote:
       | Very interesting article, but remember, making a room more airy
       | will not mitigate the long term effects of CO2 on the Earth.
       | 
       | Older people may remember the push to make your house more energy
       | efficient. So, seems you have a choice, higher energy bills or
       | higher indoors C02.
       | 
       | So what is needed, move off fossil fuels. I remember seeing
       | during the covid lockdown, C02 Levels did not raise for the first
       | time in decades and I think they may have fell a little. That is
       | because auto traffic decreased a lot. Right now I believe we are
       | on our way to +2.5C :(
        
         | Thorrez wrote:
         | >So, seems you have a choice, higher energy bills or higher
         | indoors C02.
         | 
         | An HRV or ERV can help with that.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_recovery_ventilation
        
         | wiml wrote:
         | The tension between an energy-efficient building and a well-
         | ventilated one is real, but energy-recovery ventilation (ERV or
         | HRV) is a thing and apparently works pretty well. Some kinds
         | use counter-flow heat exchangers, some use an oscillating flow
         | over a thermal mass (sometimes also a sorbent to keep moisture
         | in or out).
        
         | piskov wrote:
         | What is wrong with you?
         | 
         | You literally breath co2 out.
         | 
         | The reason it is high is because you fucking breath out in a
         | closed room. Fossil fuel my ass.
         | 
         | That's why at least in my part of the world the recommended
         | standard of what is considered great ventilation (meaning in
         | and out) is at least 1 cubic meter of fresh air per minute for
         | every person inside.
         | 
         | Half a cubic meter (or something around that) per minute per
         | person is considered an absolute minimum. Less than that and
         | the room is considered not valid for any working conditions.
         | 
         | 1000+ co2 and you get fatigue, slow brain, drowsiness, heavy
         | head, etc.
         | 
         | But be my guest, eco-brain yourself to a slowpoke IQ.
        
         | nmlt wrote:
         | Your reply is unrelated to the article which discusses
         | measuring CO2 in order to gauge pathogen transmission risk.
        
       | bonyt wrote:
       | The article linked in the first paragraph is almost more
       | interesting to me[1]. Some of these places, like the subway, have
       | air frequently circulated that can filter aerosols but leave CO2;
       | this limitation makes me somewhat doubt its usefulness as a proxy
       | for disease transmission risk.
       | 
       | Apart from disease transmission, since I've gotten a CO2 monitor
       | in my apartment I've noticed that running the gas stove or oven
       | for even a little while will make a _huge_ spike in CO2.
       | 
       | [1] https://grieve-smith.com/ftn/2026/02/so-you-want-to-
       | monitor-...
        
         | jadbox wrote:
         | Gas stove, oven, and clothes dryer with polyester/nylon will
         | all cause my air quality sensor to go into the red.
         | 
         | Some takeaways:
         | 
         | - be very careful of what oils you're using when cooking food
         | to ensure they are not turning volatile
         | 
         | - try to avoid using a dryer for non-natural poly clothes and
         | use hang drying instead
        
       | jeandejean wrote:
       | The problem isn't to breathe CO2, it's pumping it in the
       | atmosphere... This article really misses the point.
        
         | snibsnib wrote:
         | The article has nothing to do with atmospheric CO2, it is about
         | using CO2 as a proxy measurement for virus transfer.
        
         | marginalia_nu wrote:
         | Elevated CO2 levels reduces your cognitive abilities fairly
         | significantly.
        
       | mgilroy wrote:
       | Nightingal, and Robertson before her, argued for better designs
       | in hospitals to overcome these issues. We are over 150 years on
       | from this arguement which has already been proven.
       | 
       | Using a digital sensor isn't required. The spread of various
       | Corona viruses and others increase during colder weather and are
       | more likely to spread in enclosed environments with limited air
       | flow.
       | 
       | Cafe door shut, no air exchange in place, it's winter and half
       | the clientele are reaching for hankies. Your probably catching a
       | cold.
        
       | MetaWhirledPeas wrote:
       | Buying a (relatively expensive) CO2 monitor is one of those
       | purchases that I was pensive about at first, but have zero
       | regrets about a few years later. I was ignorant of a lot of
       | things related to air quality, CO2 in particular. We were
       | foolishly running a gas stove in a house with no ventilation,
       | which probably had us up in the 1500+ range every time. This may
       | seem like an obvious no-no to most of you but it was not a lesson
       | we had ever learned.
       | 
       | You also get to see some other interesting observations, like how
       | local construction digging up dirt on your street can cause
       | elevated radon levels for months on end.
        
       | jerlam wrote:
       | I've got an Aranet4 and started tracking CO2 and submitting it to
       | IndoorCO2Map (via https://whn.global/indoor-co2-map-
       | co2-monitoring-and-data-co...), but after a short period of time,
       | there aren't really any surprises. Carrying a CO2 detector
       | everywhere seems like mostly a way to give yourself anxiety.
       | 
       | If it's crowded now, or was recently, the CO2 is going to be
       | high. If the building is old, or low volume, the effect will be
       | worse.
        
       | woeirua wrote:
       | Am I the only person here confused by the line the author draws
       | between high CO2 levels and high transmissibility of viruses. I
       | think they're confusing correlation for causation here.
        
         | davorak wrote:
         | > In the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic I learned that we
         | can estimate our level of risk by checking the concentration of
         | carbon dioxide in the air, because when infected people breathe
         | out virus aerosols, they also breathe out CO2.
         | 
         | The above is from the author early on. So they go out of their
         | way to point out that it is an estimate and also point out the
         | mechanism that allows it work as an estimate in some
         | conditions. "when infected people breathe out virus aerosols,
         | they also breathe out CO2."
         | 
         | The article does not reenforce this through out the article
         | though and leaves it to the reader to keep in mind.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-03-29 23:00 UTC)