[HN Gopher] Musketeer d'Artagnan's remains believed found under ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Musketeer d'Artagnan's remains believed found under Dutch church
        
       Author : xenocratus
       Score  : 95 points
       Date   : 2026-03-25 15:46 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.bbc.co.uk)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.bbc.co.uk)
        
       | brightball wrote:
       | Hold on...that was an entirely fictional story?
       | 
       | Is there some part of it that was based on real people?
        
         | bena wrote:
         | Same here. I thought it was completely fictional.
         | 
         | So, I immediately looked it up. There was a real d'Artagnan, he
         | was kind of a big deal, so Dumas wrote some stories based on a
         | fictionalized version of the real d'Artagnan.
        
           | bigstrat2003 wrote:
           | Wow, that's really cool. I knew that Cardinal Richelieu was a
           | real person (and that he is credited with inventing the
           | butter knife!), but I didn't realize there were others.
        
             | fusslo wrote:
             | D'Artagnan - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_de_Batz_
             | de_Castelmore_...
             | 
             | Cardinal Mazarin -
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_Mazarin
             | 
             | Athos - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armand_d%27Athos
             | 
             | Porthos - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_de_Porthau
             | 
             | Aramis - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_d%27Aramitz
             | 
             | Comte de Troisville (D'artagnan's mentor) -
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comte_de_Troisville
             | 
             | All highly fictionalized and I have had trouble finding
             | information on the real counterparts (aside from the
             | Cardinal). I started learning about that period of history
             | after listening to the D'Artagnan Romances in audiobook
             | form.
             | 
             | The other interesting thing is Gatien de Courtilz de Sanras
             | wrote semi-fictional accounts of D'Artagnan, published 27
             | years after D'artagnan's death and 144 years before Dumas'
             | The Three Musketeers (
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatien_de_Courtilz_de_Sandras
             | ).
        
               | hodgesrm wrote:
               | Don't forget the Duke of Buckingham - https://en.wikipedi
               | a.org/wiki/George_Villiers,_1st_Duke_of_B.... Dumas'
               | fictionalized version was far better than the real
               | person.
        
             | kergonath wrote:
             | > I knew that Cardinal Richelieu was a real person
             | 
             | And he was more than a big deal. One of the most powerful
             | people in Europe at the time.
        
             | expedition32 wrote:
             | Maastricht today is not a French city. The city was
             | returned after a peace treaty.
             | 
             | A hero and a heroic death in a pointless war.
        
           | lo_zamoyski wrote:
           | I had a similar experience with the characters in
           | Sienkiewicz's Trilogy. A number of the fictional characters
           | were amalgamations of actual historical figures, with added
           | or modified histories. For example, the character of Sir
           | Wolodyjowski is actually drawn from two figures with the same
           | surname.
           | 
           | (For those interested, Jerzy Hoffman has produced excellent
           | film adaptations of these books, two while navigating
           | communist censorship, which is why they were filmed in
           | reverse order. In _reading_ order:
           | 
           | - "With Fire and Sword" (1999) [1]
           | 
           | - "The Deluge" (1974) [0] (trailer for the significantly
           | shortened 2014 director's cut [3])
           | 
           | - "The Colonel Wolodyjowski" [2]
           | 
           | In my opinion, and this is widely regarded to be the case,
           | the original 5+ hour "The Deluge" is the best of the three
           | and frankly one of the best movies I've ever watched.)
           | 
           | [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqdrKEEt_nc
           | 
           | [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCESk2joFo8
           | 
           | [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFO4O4JNjXw
           | 
           | [3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBfhvt1zrfU
        
           | brightball wrote:
           | I read the original Dumas story a few years back. Never had
           | any idea.
        
         | rags2riches wrote:
         | Some Swedes will be delighted to learn that not only was there
         | a historical d'Artagnan, but also a real life cardinal named
         | Mazarin. But I have yet to find a historical person named
         | Loranga.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loranga,_Masarin_och_Dartanjan...
        
           | Bayart wrote:
           | There were in fact _two_ Mazarin cardinals. The one people
           | know about, who happened to be one of the major statesmen in
           | Europe at the time, and his brother who was notoriously
           | useless.
        
             | Ylpertnodi wrote:
             | > his brother who was notoriously useless.
             | 
             | So, he became a priest? (Father Ted [a literary classic]
             | reference)
        
               | throw0101d wrote:
               | > _So, he became a priest? (Father Ted [a literary
               | classic] reference)_
               | 
               | Galileo had (illegitimate) daughters but was unable to
               | find husbands for them, so their remaining options were
               | to become nuns. One seems to have quite brilliant, but
               | the other a drunk:
               | 
               | * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo%27s_Daughter
               | 
               | Back in the day the Church was the social safety net of
               | society, so many folks ended up in monasteries as a form
               | of charity for folks that would perhaps otherwise would
               | have no other way to support themselves.
        
               | jfengel wrote:
               | Only if you were reasonably wealthy.
               | 
               | Monasteries were not orphanages. You could sometimes dump
               | a baby off there (they had deposit bins specifically for
               | that), but they wouldn't raise it. They would usually
               | find somebody else to take care of it.
               | 
               | Monasteries did not have accept older children or adults,
               | either. Children given to the church would often come
               | with money for their care and feeding. The poor would
               | often get turned away.
               | 
               | A monastery could be a safe place to house offspring who
               | didn't have a family who could (publicly) support them.
               | They were also good places for second sons and other
               | spare children, and with enough money donated they could
               | work their way up in the church hierarchy to do the
               | family some good.
               | 
               | But it was a lousy social safety net.
        
               | Shitty-kitty wrote:
               | Genearlly nuns would enter to convent before puberty
               | while boys would enter the monastary after. You are right
               | that they were not orphanages and did not take young
               | children, thou what orphanages there were, were run by
               | the Church. Abandoing newborns to a orphanage was not
               | possible. Babies can't survive on cow's milk, especially
               | the unpastuzed kind.
        
           | PokemonNoGo wrote:
           | https://et.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Anga :D
        
         | pax wrote:
         | This autumn I have visited the Lavardens Castle which had an
         | exhibition on D'Artagnan. Stole the English version of the
         | explanations (QR codes, hosted incognito on their website)
         | 
         | https://pax.github.io/playground/lavardens-dartagnan/
        
       | ourmandave wrote:
       | Time for the next installment of the _Pirates of the Caribbean._
       | 
       | Jack Sparrow and/vs/saves the 3 Musketeers.
        
       | lostlogin wrote:
       | That sounds like someone just decided to have a dig around inside
       | the church.
        
       | schmookeeg wrote:
       | One of my favorite books -- I had no idea there was a real-life
       | inspiration for it (Balzampleu!) This will get me to re-read it,
       | it's been too long. :)
        
         | cholantesh wrote:
         | I was aware that Aramis and of course the various royals and
         | aristocrats were real, but not the individual soldiers. Loved
         | this novel growing, seems like the Count of Monte Cristo is
         | seen as more 'serious' literature, but the Three Musketeers
         | will always have a special place in my mind.
        
           | kergonath wrote:
           | > I was aware that Aramis and of course the various royals
           | and aristocrats were real
           | 
           | It's more that their names were real, but their descriptions
           | and their actions in the books are almost entirely fictional.
        
       | srean wrote:
       | Count of Monte Cristo is also semi fictional.
       | 
       | A few month's ago I started reading Three Musketeers again. I had
       | forgotten how relentless and fast moving it is. Moving from one
       | action set piece to the next from beginning to end. It is almost
       | overpowering, literally had to catch my breadth before turning a
       | page.
       | 
       | I had forgotten how it was when I had read it as a kid.
        
         | chr-s wrote:
         | I read both of these in the last year and they're both
         | phenomenal. I'm working my way through the classics, there's a
         | reason they've survived centuries.
         | 
         | Actually, I listened to a dramatization of The Three Musketeers
         | and I was struck by how _funny_ it is. The 4-way duel at the
         | beginning is hilarious and Aramis' and Porthos' respective
         | romantic escapades give great comic relief to what is otherwise
         | an action packed adventure.
         | 
         | The Count of Monte Cristo is an investment, and the middle
         | third drags, but it's necessary to set up the final third,
         | which is so rewarding for the reader. It's the best tale of
         | revenge and redemption I've ever read.
        
           | ramses0 wrote:
           | """Hey ChatGPT, I've heard you make a good book club partner.
           | I've just read [Three Musketeers|Count of Monte Cristo] and
           | want to have a discussion about it. Ask me what I think
           | before you tell me what you think, let's go!"""
           | 
           | ...I read both of the books recently and it was illuminating
           | to be able to near-instantly explore avenues of
           | insight/criticism of both of the books. Three Musketeers
           | matches fairly closely to Wizard of Oz (vice versa actually),
           | and Monte Cristo raises some really interesting questions if
           | you view "The Count" as basically a fallen angel of divine
           | justice (and the benefits/costs to him via that role).
           | 
           | Since my circle of IRL people who'd recently read both the
           | unabridged books in the last month is infinitesimally small,
           | it was one of my first "arms-length" test cases of "The
           | GPT's" for fitness-for-purpose. I'm still a bit muddy on
           | throwing a bunch of personal data and thoughts to remote
           | servers (or becoming dependent on that interaction pattern),
           | but digging in and analyzing old books was a great kindof
           | gut-check and something I enjoy doing when finishing a book.
           | 
           | I know it's regurgitating a bunch of of reddit comments and
           | academic books/papers (in Dumas's case), but overall- highly
           | recommended!
        
             | kjs3 wrote:
             | Yes...clearly running to something that is "regurgitating a
             | bunch of of reddit comments and academic books/papers" is
             | much, much better than finding a couple of actual humans
             | that read books, and then talking to them. Peak AI right
             | there.
        
               | ramses0 wrote:
               | You're invited to my party!
        
         | nine_k wrote:
         | One of the best lines I read about "Three Musketeers" went
         | approximately like so: "What do you do if your duty before your
         | country, your military orders, your friendships, your love, and
         | your honor all contradict each other beyond reconciliation?"
        
         | hodgesrm wrote:
         | The Three Musketeers is my favorite adventure story of all
         | time. The story of how D'Artagnan insults all three musketeers
         | in succession at their first meeting, challenges them to duels
         | one after the other, and ends up fighting on their side in a
         | melee against the royal guards is just one of countless,
         | hilarious adventures. The book just gets better from there.
        
       | ibero wrote:
       | there's no hard evidence here. the "99%" referenced in the
       | article is someone's personal subjective confidence it's him.
       | body buried under church is not particularly eventful news as it
       | stands.
        
       | roysting wrote:
       | What bothers me about these kinds of things is that we are
       | sanitizing all of the soil of indigenous culture exactly like was
       | done in other place around the globe by the force that drove
       | "colonialism".
       | 
       | Now this impulse to scour and loot humanity of its indigenous
       | cultural sites is turned on the indigenous Europeans, by the same
       | ruling class and their institutional "researchers", "scientists"
       | and "adventurer" apparatchiks that also scoured and looted the
       | reset of the world and stored it in their museums, e.g., Egyptian
       | artifacts.
       | 
       | Is nothing sacred or "holy" anymore? Can nothing survive the
       | self-important narcissism of "scientists" that must impose
       | themselves on everyone against their will? Why are we allowing
       | these types of "scientists" to just plunder and destroy the
       | cultural artifacts and sites simply because they are curious and
       | want to write self-important papers to advance their careers and
       | standing?
       | 
       | It's literally grave robbery, only more pretentious because the
       | "scientists" are creating "collections" in their institutions.
       | This is the very same kind of "scientist" with no respect for
       | humanity that created the scientific classification that created
       | racist supremacism...for science, of course.
       | 
       | How would you feel about "scientists" digging up and grave
       | robbing and filing away the bones of some African, Asian, or
       | South American indigenous? Why should we accept it for European
       | indigenous?
       | 
       | People complain about the fact that, e.g., the British did it for
       | centuries, e.g., all over Egypt and Indian grave and cultural
       | sites, yet people are fine with these people doing it to the
       | European indigenous cultural sites apparently. How about we
       | reject this kind of purging and sanitizing of the earth of
       | indigenous culture everywhere or at least come up with some
       | standard of restoring things once investigated. All these
       | artifacts survived literal millennia, but most of them will not
       | survive the pretentious self-important narcissism of "scientist"
       | grave robbers.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-03-25 23:01 UTC)