[HN Gopher] Building a Reader for the Smallest Hard Drive
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Building a Reader for the Smallest Hard Drive
        
       Author : voctor
       Score  : 89 points
       Date   : 2026-03-16 09:04 UTC (4 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.willwhang.dev)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.willwhang.dev)
        
       | tda wrote:
       | Is there a video somewhere of the one inch microdrive with
       | acrylic display shown in the article?
        
         | voctor wrote:
         | https://x.com/will_whang/status/2014960768249372845
        
       | Tempest1981 wrote:
       | Cool!
       | 
       | I found the old drive that worked with my Canon camera. It's a
       | Hitachi 2GB Microdrive from 2003. It says CF+ Type-II. So larger,
       | with a CompactFlash interface, boring in comparison.
       | 
       | More history: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microdrive
       | 
       | I'm trying to remember the camera... Canon Powershot S1 IS maybe?
       | It used a lot more battery running the microdrive.
        
         | jusssi wrote:
         | Damn, now I want one just to de-lid one and put it on a shelf.
         | Looks like eBay has plenty of these.
        
           | Tempest1981 wrote:
           | Tempting.
           | 
           | I wonder what material they used for the platter. I once took
           | apart a 1.8" drive, and got a big surprise when the platter
           | suddenly shattered. I was expecting aluminum, not
           | glass/ceramic substrate.
        
             | adrian_b wrote:
             | Yes, glass was the typical substrate used in small HDDs,
             | even in many of the 2.5" HDDs, e.g. in all the 2.5" HDDs
             | that I had.
             | 
             | It is easier to ensure that glass substrates are perfectly
             | plane and without any surface defects than for substrates
             | made of aluminum alloy.
             | 
             | In 3.5" disks the risk of shattering becomes too great, so
             | aluminum alloy is preferred.
        
               | alnwlsn wrote:
               | I discovered that one day when I accidentally stepped on
               | a removed 2.5" platter in bare feet :)
        
           | raddan wrote:
           | One of my most delightful discoveries of the early 2000s was
           | that iPod Minis used Microdrives that were pin-compatible
           | with CompactFlash cards. I had a little cottage industry in
           | the back of my office upgrading my coworkers' old iPods to
           | use bigger, solid state disks. I still have my 256GB iPod
           | Mini. Aside from battery life, it still runs fine, and it is
           | by far my favorite music player form factor.
        
       | wartywhoa23 wrote:
       | Lost me at the first OpenClaw mention.
        
         | Tempest1981 wrote:
         | Surprised me too. In the end, I guess it's a time-saving tool
         | for a tedious task. But reduces the old-school grittiness of
         | the adventure. Still an enjoyable read.
        
         | jgrahamc wrote:
         | Why? It seems foolish to have a knee jerk reaction to someone
         | using a tool that got them where they needed to be.
        
           | iovrthoughtthis wrote:
           | I suppose its a bit like winning a first person shooter game
           | with aim assist on
           | 
           | It is not an authentic display of pure skill
        
           | raddan wrote:
           | That's a good question, and I can't speak for the parent, but
           | for me, I like reading about a person's journey of discovery.
           | There were many insights this person did not have because he
           | turned the task over to a power tool. People can use whatever
           | tools they want. I also can spend my attention however I
           | like. Reading about someone using AI is just boring to me.
        
           | wartywhoa23 wrote:
           | Almost every commenter in this thread explained this better
           | than I could.
           | 
           | It's a bit like watching a 2 hour movie about a knight who'd
           | been preparing to save his beloved princess from a dragon for
           | 1h 59s, and then the screen fades to black, the narrator
           | proclaims that the dragon is done, the knight marries the
           | princess and they live happily ever after. Closing credits!
        
         | fancyfredbot wrote:
         | I was not evicting expecting to see OpenClaw here either. It's
         | out of keeping with the rest of the article...
         | 
         | At least there's acknowledgement of limitations and it's not
         | just hype. Overall a useful data point in terms of what's
         | possible.
        
         | wkjagt wrote:
         | I am not necessarily against AI, but in this case, I also lost
         | interest at that point. I love reading about reverse
         | engineering, and to me the first part of the article felt like
         | it was leading up to that. But then it ended with what to me
         | feels like "and then I asked AI to finish the project for me,
         | which it did". That's not a criticism by the way, there's
         | nothing wrong with the author using AI to reach a certain goal.
         | I just don't find that interesting personally.
        
           | jrmg wrote:
           | Felt this way too.
           | 
           | I may not have felt this way if the article had discussed
           | this step in as much detail as the first steps - describing
           | what was _done_ by the agent rather than just that an agent
           | was used and the results. It all felt a bit "then it drew the
           | rest of the goddamn owl".
           | 
           | I'm not sure though - part of the appeal of this kind of
           | article for me is the description of the human emotions - the
           | highs and lows of doing the task - and that would possibly
           | still have felt missing.
           | 
           | Edit: Actually, now that I say that, there was a lot missing.
           | How was the circuit designed, for example? How were
           | components selected?
        
         | ahartmetz wrote:
         | I did finish the article, but for me, it was missing a
         | discussion and review, probably manual improvement, of the code
         | that came out of the LLM. Reverse-engineering means
         | understanding a system that you didn't previously understand,
         | which is still (with some degradation) possible while using an
         | LLM.
        
       | alias_neo wrote:
       | I remember my Nokia N91 which had a 4GB version of one of these
       | tiny HDDs, blew my mind at the time.
       | 
       | Man do I miss the N-series, I had so many good phones in that
       | era.
        
         | andai wrote:
         | First time hearing about this. I just looked up that drive.
         | That's genuinely amazing, and kind of adorable.
        
         | tarasglek wrote:
         | Worked on that phone. I diagnosed if music player cache was
         | working by putting back of phone to my ear and listening for
         | seeking clicks from hdd
        
           | alias_neo wrote:
           | Nice! I loved that phone, was one of my favourites. One of
           | the only, if not the only phone I ever owned that had a metal
           | shell that I an recall.
           | 
           | I had most of the N range, and was particularly interested in
           | music ones, N95 was love/hate because the music
           | button/reverse slide was so slow sometimes, and generally it
           | just wasn't as good as N91 for music listening with its
           | proper headphone jack placement, and always accessible
           | controls.
           | 
           | What kind of magic did that HDD have that it could be thrown
           | around like a phone typically is without the issues we would
           | see if we'd handled a laptop with HDD the same way?
        
             | tarasglek wrote:
             | Had an accelerometer that turned off hard drive when motion
             | detected. High end ibm thinkpads had that too. Turns out if
             | seek head is parked properly, its fairly robust
             | 
             | N91 also had a ridiculously high quality DAC that beat
             | pants off iPods of that gen.
        
       | thehamkercat wrote:
       | "Coded by OpenClaw" written on PCB
       | 
       | was this necessary? could've said "Code written by LLM" or
       | something
        
         | ballstein wrote:
         | Sent from my BlackBerry Storm
        
       | mkirsten wrote:
       | Still a great story, great page and impressive reverse
       | engineering. Isn't OpenClaw vs. he did it "himself" a bit
       | analogue to the critique "oh, he wrote the firmware in C++ and
       | let the compiler figure out the assembly code".
       | 
       | Maybe you wanted to see the assembly code, and that's fine. But
       | he took a potentially difficult problem, found tools to solve it
       | and documented (to some degree) the process?
        
       | zimpenfish wrote:
       | Pretty sure I've got one of these in a 4GB USB package[0].
       | 
       | [0] I'm 99.9% sure it's not SSD/SRAM/Flash because I'm 99.9% sure
       | it predates cheap [those] by years. But I'll have to dig it out
       | and get the full USB/HDD info later to check.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-03-20 23:01 UTC)