[HN Gopher] Connecticut and the 1 Kilometer Effect
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Connecticut and the 1 Kilometer Effect
        
       Author : speckx
       Score  : 33 points
       Date   : 2026-03-19 17:52 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (alearningaday.blog)
 (TXT) w3m dump (alearningaday.blog)
        
       | grantpitt wrote:
       | Somewhat analogously the best predictor of if I read a book on a
       | given day is if I read the day before, I'd guess.
        
       | pavel_lishin wrote:
       | > _People who prioritize their health are more likely to have
       | friends who prioritize their health. And so on._ > > _We become
       | like the people we choose to be around._
       | 
       | I'm not convinced that that's it. It's more likely that the first
       | person who got solar installed talked to their neighbors about
       | it, and the neighbors were convinced. It's not like after you
       | move to a neighborhood, you're really choosing anything after
       | that point about your neighbors.
        
         | Bjartr wrote:
         | You're not actually disagreeing with what you've quoted.
         | Learning about things from those you are near to is one
         | mechanism for we become like those we choose to be around.
        
       | worik wrote:
       | This reminds me to get solar.
       | 
       | Proximity is not just geographical.
        
       | skyberrys wrote:
       | A short and sweet message in this little learning of the day
       | post. You tend to learn from your geographic neighbors. It makes
       | sense! Can we see the same thing for ebikes, and low water lawns?
        
       | xg15 wrote:
       | Kind of reminds me of "nucleation sites" in physics.
       | 
       | I think one factor that's missing from the explanation is the
       | extensive media and political coverage that solar panels got:
       | There are probably very few people by now that don't know what a
       | roof solar panel is or who don't have an opinion on them.
       | 
       | So my guess is that most of those neighbors who "suddenly"
       | decided to also get a panel, were already interested or at least
       | curious about getting one. (In the sense of "I should totally be
       | getting one some time, but I have no time/now idea how to
       | start/other things are more important/etc")
       | 
       | Maybe the early adopter was then what changed peoples' stance
       | from a vague idea to a concrete plan.
        
       | hyperhello wrote:
       | Whether solar is economically reasonable is a matter of the
       | variables of your location. You need strong retail power parity
       | laws, for example. If solar makes sense for one person it makes
       | sense for the other people in the area. Why does there have to be
       | a "catching on" effect?
        
         | teddyh wrote:
         | Theoretically, if solar did not make much economic sense at
         | all, it would be purely a signalling thing. And _those_ kind of
         | things _do_ spread by the "catching on" effect. People might
         | then get solar panels just to be seen as the kind of people who
         | have solar panels, i.e. not the wrong kind of people.
        
           | hyperhello wrote:
           | Good point.
        
       | dragontamer wrote:
       | How about an alternative explanation?
       | 
       | What if a substantial amount of local solar contractors are doing
       | door to door sales? Or other locality/proximity based sales
       | (signs, driving a car with ads on it, and the like?)
        
         | 4ndrewl wrote:
         | Is there evidence for this?
        
           | cyberax wrote:
           | I worked at a company that made a product just for this
           | purpose: making estimates for solar panels for door-to-door
           | sales. It was pretty popular.
        
       | jandrese wrote:
       | Some of it may also be neighborhoods where solar contractors went
       | door to door selling the systems. Even if you don't buy from that
       | salesman you get the numbers in your head and start to realize it
       | isn't some exotic tech for elite weirdos.
        
         | bitwize wrote:
         | My sister was just such a representative going door to door in
         | Connecticut. This was likely a factor. The southern coast of
         | Connecticut, being in the shadow of New York and thus dense
         | with rich exurban homeowners, is a prime market for such
         | contractors.
        
       | SoftTalker wrote:
       | a/k/a "Keeping up with the Joneses"
        
       | heisenbit wrote:
       | Hmm, this actually could have policy implications. If one wants
       | to subsidize a new technology and allocated a limited budget
       | often the first movers are getting it and those first movers may
       | be clusters which is not ideal driving broad adoption. So
       | creating very small geo buckets for adoption oriented subsidies
       | would make sense.
        
       | jasonhong wrote:
       | Two concepts that help explain the original article are Diffusion
       | of Innovations and Social Proof.
       | 
       | Diffusion of Innovations is a widely cited theory explaining why
       | people do or don't adopt any kind of innovation, from boiling
       | water to eating limes on British ships to installing telephones.
       | The concept of innovators, early adopters, and late adopters
       | comes from this theory. More relevant to this post is that this
       | theory posits five factors contributing to adoption, one of which
       | is Observability: you can easily see other people gaining benefit
       | from an innovation. The more Observable an innovation, the more
       | likely it is to be adopted.
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffusion_of_innovations
       | 
       | The other is Social Proof. Seeing what other people are doing,
       | especially those that are similar to you in some way, can help
       | steer your behavior, often in subtle and unconscious ways. There
       | are studies about how simple signs like "people who stayed in
       | this hotel room re-used their towels" or "most of your neighbors
       | are reducing their electricity usage too" can shift people's
       | behaviors, even without people explicitly realizing it.
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_proof
       | 
       | My colleagues and I used these concepts in several pieces of
       | research on what we called Social Cybersecurity (joking that the
       | term "Social Security" was already taken). The insight we had was
       | that cybersecurity has very low observability, making it hard for
       | innovations to diffuse through one's social network. That is, I
       | don't know what your cybersecurity practices are, and vice versa,
       | making it hard for best practices to be adopted.
       | 
       | One intervention we did was a large-scale intervention on
       | Facebook to improve observability, showing that simple messages
       | like "108 of your friends use extra security settings" did
       | increase clickthru and adoption rates of those settings.
       | https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2660267.2660271
       | 
       | We also have many other studies along similar lines, e.g. many
       | triggers for talking about and adopting security are social in
       | nature (https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/soups2014/
       | sou...), that security settings that are more social in nature
       | are more likely to be adopted
       | (https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2675133.2675225), and more.
        
         | r0ze-at-hn wrote:
         | Nearly 20 years ago after reading Diffusion of Innovations I
         | decided to use everything in the book. The company ran off a
         | few svn servers (formally cvs) and so I ran a handful of Git
         | courses at my work to help us ultimately migrate to Git (this
         | was early days of Git). I explicitly tried to find folks not
         | just near me, but physically around the office building across
         | all of the floors, teams, and orgs. They were my early adopters
         | and when random folks would come to me either curious or for
         | help I would bring them to the "local" expert and together
         | solve their problem, from there they had a local expert and
         | little hubs sprung up. We had the standard svn => git mirror
         | going when the time came to convert to Git full time in the
         | office it was very painless and a complete success.
         | 
         | I was too young to understand that this is how you run a
         | successful "transformation project", I simply was having fun
         | using every trick from that book and done the same playbook a
         | number of times over my career.
        
       | orev wrote:
       | For solar panels, many people might be interested but also
       | concerned how they look. When another neighbor gets them, people
       | will get used to how they look, realize it's not so bad, then be
       | more likely to get them.
       | 
       | I don't think the final conclusion necessarily follows, not with
       | this example. Solar panels are big and obvious on top of the
       | house. It's not the same thing as other types of values spreading
       | through a community. The house of a healthy person isn't any
       | different than that of an unhealthy one.
       | 
       | It could be simply that the door to door solar panel salesperson
       | was covering that 1 km area.
        
       | toss1 wrote:
       | Assuming this is as reliable effect as implied in the article, a
       | cost-effective method to jump start solar install rates would be
       | to map out roughly 1km wide zones and provide a high and
       | declining subsidies for the first/early people to get solar
       | installed. E.g., go to map and find your house and zone, if five
       | haven't signed up in your zone, it's open, the first to put
       | deposit on install contract gets a $15k subsidy when install
       | complete, $12k for second, $9k for 3rd, $6k 4th, $3k 5th. Adjust
       | zone sizes and/or subsidy amounts for subsidy budget, population
       | density, etc.
       | 
       | Probably a lot cheaper than a $3k subsidy for everyone, as this
       | is only 15 $3k subsidies in each zone. Also probably a lot better
       | to do this with everyone gets a $2.5k subsidy and the first five
       | get the higher incentives.
        
       | youknownothing wrote:
       | > Early adopters of solar panels tend to be people who are
       | interested in innovative technology, who find an installer they
       | trust, and who think having solar panels will benefit them.
       | 
       | Also, conspicuous conservation, people like to signal how green
       | they are:
       | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027249442...
        
       | kalinkochnev wrote:
       | It's cool to see CT mentioned on HN. I haven't seen any mentions
       | until today.
       | 
       | My family has installed solar on every house we've lived while
       | there. There is a strong economic incentive. CT has some of the
       | most expensive avg. electricity cost in the country (a few cents
       | cheaper than California for comparison). And Eversource, the
       | utility company, is universally hated. Most people want to switch
       | from their terrible service and are looking for any reason to.
        
         | hunterpayne wrote:
         | CT is too far north for solar PV to save on the CO2 generated.
         | The solar albino there is less of .25.
        
       | pjc50 wrote:
       | I wonder how effective the UK "green flash" plates
       | (https://www.gov.uk/government/news/road-to-zero-in-sight-as-...)
       | have been at EV marketing. I'm making a habit of looking out for
       | them since I'm considering getting an EV myself.
       | 
       | Nobody on our street has one. I wonder if I get one it will spark
       | a trend.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-03-19 23:00 UTC)