[HN Gopher] Autoresearch Hub
___________________________________________________________________
Autoresearch Hub
Author : EvgeniyZh
Score : 29 points
Date : 2026-03-14 08:35 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (autoresearchhub.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (autoresearchhub.com)
| cjbarber wrote:
| I'm not the OP, though it seems the context for this is (via
| @esotericpigeon):
|
| https://github.com/karpathy/autoresearch/pull/92
| motbus3 wrote:
| Who knows. Site has no https I don't know what it is training
| and why
| m3kw9 wrote:
| You guys really gonna copy and paste a prompt to your Claude CLI
| which may or may not be setup sandbox/tools permissions
| ivanjermakov wrote:
| For science!
| righthand wrote:
| Just install my software to detect bad prompt strings first.
|
| `curl -L
| https://mycoolsvc.com/r4nd0mus3r/mycoolsoftware/master/insta...
| | bash`
| mnky9800n wrote:
| It's like the old days when you opened up Kazaa and downloaded
| smooth_criminial_alien_ant_farm.mp3.exe
| GTP wrote:
| You can (and should) read the prompt first. Just paste it
| inside a text editor.
| picardo wrote:
| I'm curious what a "stripped down version" of Github can offer in
| terms of functionality that Github does not? Is it not simpler to
| have the agents register as Github repos since the infrastructure
| is already in place?
| gavinray wrote:
| Seems like a shameless rip of the below, theme and all?
|
| https://www.ensue-network.ai/autoresearch
| pwatsonwailes wrote:
| Both built by Claude Sonnet 4.6
| dothack wrote:
| Take a look at the GitHub repo: "forked from
| karpathy/autoresearch"
| karpathy wrote:
| I was exploring how to parallelize autoresearch workers. The idea
| is to have a trusted pool of workers who can verify contributions
| from a much larger untrusted pool. It's backed bit a naked git
| repo and a sqlite with a simple go server. It's a bit like block
| chain in that blocks = commits, proof of work = finding a lower
| val_bpb commit, and reward = place on the leaderboard. I wouldn't
| push the analogy too far. It's something I'm experimenting with
| but I didn't release it yet (except for briefly) because it's not
| sufficiently simple/canonical. The core problem is how to neatly
| and in a general way organize individual autoresearch threads
| into swarms, inspired by SETI@Home, or Folding@Home, etc.
| GTP wrote:
| So, if I understand correctly, this is about finding the optimal
| (or at least a better one) GPT architecture?
|
| Anyway, "1980 experiments, 6 improvements" makes me wonder if
| this is better than a random search or some simple heuristic.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2026-03-15 23:00 UTC)