[HN Gopher] The Washington Post Is Using Reader Data to Set Subs...
___________________________________________________________________
The Washington Post Is Using Reader Data to Set Subscription Prices
Author : kklisura
Score : 23 points
Date : 2026-03-14 20:18 UTC (2 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (washingtonian.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (washingtonian.com)
| bethekidyouwant wrote:
| Light on details. Could be as simple as user who reads a couple
| articles a month gets a lower rate than someone who reads daily.
| redgridtactical wrote:
| This is just dynamic pricing with extra steps. Airlines have done
| this for decades but at least they're transparent about it. The
| difference here is that readers don't know the person next to
| them is paying a different price for the same article. Once you
| start using behavioral data to set prices, the incentive flips
| from "make content worth paying for" to "figure out who's
| desperate enough to pay more." Not a great look for a newspaper
| that positions itself as a public service.
| rimbo789 wrote:
| Well this should be banned. Or at least watpo should be required
| to be transparent about this whenever you subscribe
| throwworhtthrow wrote:
| Another situation where bad actors benefit. From the article:
|
| > What really interests Cian, who has published research[1]
| exploring how audiences tend to have less trust in media
| outlets that are transparent about their AI use, is the fact
| that the Post disclosed its use of algorithmic pricing at all.
| "If you ask people [whether they] want transparency on what's
| behind your pricing strategy, people say 'yes,'" he says. "But
| what we found in my research is a paradox, in the sense that
| people think that they want to know, but once they know, the
| reaction is worse than not knowing."
|
| > [1] https://ideas.darden.virginia.edu/AI-disclosure-dilemma
| 1123581321 wrote:
| Do these models try to factor the target's knowledge of what
| things cost, or maybe even their knowledge of dynamic pricing or
| discounting practices? That seems like it would not necessarily
| inversely correlate with wealth.
|
| To use an extreme example, you'd have wanted your model to have
| offered Warren Buffet the base price, or even a deal.
| like_any_other wrote:
| > "This price was set by an algorithm using your personal data."
|
| How's that "I have nothing to hide" working out?
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2026-03-14 23:01 UTC)