[HN Gopher] Philosoph Jurgen Habermas Gestorben
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Philosoph Jurgen Habermas Gestorben
        
       Author : sebastian_z
       Score  : 143 points
       Date   : 2026-03-14 14:08 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.spiegel.de)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.spiegel.de)
        
       | PaulHoule wrote:
       | I love his
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legitimation_Crisis_(book)
       | 
       | but feel this ponderous two-volume set
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Theory_of_Communicative_Ac...
       | 
       | is thoroughly refuted by our last two decades of experience with
       | electronic communications.
        
         | jauntywundrkind wrote:
         | Perhaps the missing component is that not only is rationality
         | communicable, but so is irrationally.
         | 
         | The memetic material out there has had an incredible and
         | tumultuous era of rapid evolution. Theres been such radical
         | pressure to get better at consuming our attention, at trying to
         | get ideas to spread. The means have perhaps outstripped the
         | Humana ability to communicate & make sense of so much highly
         | weaponized memetic systems.
        
         | biggestlou wrote:
         | Thoroughly refuted? Sorry, but no
        
       | FabHK wrote:
       | I wondered to which extent Habermas with the Frankfurter Schule
       | and Critical Theory could be held partially responsible for
       | postmodernism's march through the institutions, identity
       | politics, and indirectly for Trump's two election victories. But
       | it looks like he was explicitly critical of postmodernism and
       | other counter-enlightenment movements.
       | 
       | RIP.
        
         | gr__or wrote:
         | I find this to be vile political posting, moving responsibility
         | for Trump's rightwing fascism to a social theorists is just
         | misguided, banal and does not belong here. Don't you have X for
         | that?
        
           | lmf4lol wrote:
           | Wait until you discover that Alex Karp is a (Neo-)Marxist...
           | 
           | Philosophical insights and methods can be used for politics
           | of any color.
           | 
           | I do agree that its wrong to say that Habermas would be
           | responsible(!) for any of that though. As if thinking up
           | stuff would make you responsible for the misuse of those
           | ideas down the road.
        
           | LocutusOfBorges wrote:
           | It fits in with the contemporary mainstream on this site,
           | unfortunately. Whenever politics comes up on HN, it
           | invariably brings all the cranks out to play.
        
           | FabHK wrote:
           | 1. "Responsibility" was indeed too strong. Involved in the
           | chain of causality, maybe.
           | 
           | 2. I'm not blaming Trump's rightwing fascism on social
           | theorists. I wondered whether a backlash against overbearing
           | postmodernism enabled Trump's election victories. Sorry if
           | you find that question vile and banal; I find it rather
           | consequential and important to avoid further fascists.
        
             | panagathon wrote:
             | It just comes off a bit victim-blamey, I think. If it's not
             | intended, you should certainly be aware that it can.
        
             | parodysbird wrote:
             | Trump is the most postmodern politician, and MAGA the most
             | postmodern of political movements
        
           | atmosx wrote:
           | In all honesty that's not even the worst part.
           | 
           | He signed that "never again" letter, completely buying into
           | the exceptionalism of one group over all others... They kind
           | of threw the baby out of the water and moved into Heidegger
           | territory quickly. They seemed to put "who" over "what" very,
           | very hastily. One would expect an enlightened mind to
           | understand the difference and maybe phrase his concerns a bit
           | more "inclusively". But let's be honest, it wasn't a mistake.
           | 
           | Anyway, we'll take the good parts and move on.
           | 
           | RIP.
        
         | lmf4lol wrote:
         | Yes very interesting topic and HIGHLY relevant.
         | 
         | Here is a good essay from Moira Weigel that you might want to
         | read: https://www.boundary2.org/2020/07/moira-weigel-palantir-
         | goes...
         | 
         | It is called ,, Palantir Goes to the Frankfurt School" and
         | analysis Karp's PhD thesis. Which, even though he didnt write
         | it under Habermas supervision, was highly influenced by the
         | Frankfurt school (Adorno et al).
         | 
         | The author also provides some thoughts on your question. The
         | connection between Critical Theory and Trumpism
        
         | calf wrote:
         | Very much so, I hold this view as someone who reads a bit of
         | Critical Theory; Catherine Liu recently makes a case for this
         | as well as disparate other public intellectuals from Chomsky to
         | Zizek have also generally critiqued CT academics,
         | postmodernists, etc. The basic argument is something like,
         | Frankfurt School itself had a tension over their primary text
         | (Dialectic of Enlightenment) by Adorno and one faction
         | basically got totally divorced from Marxist ideas, and the
         | result of that was bad theories and bad praxis and then even
         | worse being coopted as a capitalist intelligentsia. See also
         | Thomas Picketty's Brahmin Left. I'm oversimplifying but there
         | is a continued strain of this criticism (albeit largely on deaf
         | ears).
        
         | bwestergard wrote:
         | "Frankfurt School Critical Theory" went through several
         | generations with different commitments and each of those
         | generations was quite politically and theoretically diverse.
         | 
         | The only true statements that hold for all writers at all times
         | are largely uninteresting.
         | 
         | What can be said with confidence is that Frankfurt School
         | theorists were not "counter-enlightenment".
         | 
         | Adorno and Horkheimer were explicitly trying to explain why the
         | ideal of the enlightenment - greater rationality in social and
         | political affairs and a fuller realization of individual moral
         | autonomy - had not been achieved in their time. They saw
         | themselves, rightly, as more faithful heirs to the tradition in
         | their attempt to "rescue" it than those who insisted it did not
         | require rescue. You may disagree - many within the tradition of
         | critical theory have - but I don't think readings of their
         | texts which see them as "counter-enlightement" can be
         | sustained.
         | 
         | "I wondered to which extent Habermas with the Frankfurter
         | Schule and Critical Theory could be held partially responsible
         | for postmodernism's march through the institutions, identity
         | politics, and indirectly for Trump's two election victories."
         | 
         | With all due respect, this sentence betrays a complete
         | unfamiliarity with "postmodernism", "the long march through the
         | institutions", and "identity politics". It wildly anachronistic
         | to conflate these. It makes about as much sense as saying that
         | Mitterand was an Avignon pope.
        
         | tsss wrote:
         | Maybe he was critical, but he was also a part of them.
        
         | zozbot234 wrote:
         | The Frankfurter Schule was politically conservative, the
         | "leftism" of present-day identity politics is a rehash of
         | radical 1970s Maoism that simply coopts the Frankfurter Schule
         | lexicon in agitating for a new "Great Cultural Revolution"
         | throughout the West, consequences be damned. This is the
         | "counter-enlightenment" part: the Maoist "Great Proletarian
         | Cultural Revolution" saw Enlightenment values as reflecting
         | "bourgeois privilege", and identity politics has wholly
         | inherited this point of view. Frankfurter Schule members would
         | have disagreed quite sharply with that position, their outlook
         | was defined by a whole lot of nuance.
        
       | Tomte wrote:
       | SEP:
       | https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2024/entries/habermas...
       | 
       | My favorite quote of Habermas ist about Luhmann's[1] theory:
       | "It's all wrong, but it's got quality".
       | 
       | [1] the Zettelkasten person
        
         | smooc wrote:
         | I like Luhmann's theory better. What i like about it is that
         | Luhmann argues that the smallest denominator of a social system
         | is a realation between two. Habermas says it can be brought
         | down to an individual. Which in my mind defeats the "social"
         | part.
        
           | goodmythical wrote:
           | Havin not read the underlying theory, is the society of one
           | constructed with the belief that one has relations to one's
           | self?
           | 
           | That is, I could see that the idea of a society of two could
           | be derived from a society of one in that I could extend my
           | desire to be kind to my past, present, and future selves, to
           | a desire to be kind to selves that are not my own.
           | 
           | Kind of like a computing network being a generalisation of
           | the network that exists inside anyone one machine in that
           | networking is just i/o with more steps and more wire?
        
           | biggestlou wrote:
           | Where exactly in Habermas is such an idea expressed?
        
       | shevy-java wrote:
       | 96 years old. He lived a "full life".
        
       | sombragris wrote:
       | RIP. He was a giant among philosophers.
        
       | the-grump wrote:
       | Rick Roderick on Habermas.
       | 
       | The series "Self Under Siege" is one of my favorite things on
       | YouTube. Highly recommend watching all 8 in order.
       | 
       | https://youtu.be/aXkmmfaZhEg
        
         | prydt wrote:
         | +1 These are incredible lectures and there's another series
         | from Rick Roderick on the history of western philosophy that I
         | also love:
         | https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLxPmwaGMOAvsZp9vavFkyxYFZ...
        
         | CamperBob2 wrote:
         | For the benefit of those like me who haven't heard of Roderick,
         | some further digging leads to this:
         | https://rickroderick.org/max-roderick/
         | 
         | Major, _major_ rabbit hole warning. You think you 're about to
         | read something about a philosophy professor, and what you get
         | is an Alice Munro/Larry McMurtry mashup. His son seems to be a
         | pretty amazing writer in his own right.
        
       | minebreaker wrote:
       | I have to say I'm quite disappointed by his attitude against
       | Palestine. RIP, but not with the victims.
       | 
       | https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/nov/22/israel-hamas-w...
        
         | nwellnhof wrote:
         | The majority of Germans is completely biased towards Zionism
         | because of their history, so it's more of a cultural than a
         | personal thing.
        
           | submeta wrote:
           | No we are not. 80% of us are against what Israel does in
           | Palestine. But the Goverment and media will tell you
           | otherwise. It's got nothing to do with our history. Konrad
           | Adenauer--first chancellor--once said:
           | 
           | "The power of the Jews even today, especially in America,
           | should not be underestimated. And therefore I have very
           | deliberately and very consciously -- and that was always my
           | opinion -- put all my strength, the best I could, to bring
           | about a reconciliation between the Jewish people and the
           | German people."
           | 
           | It was never about guilt, still is not. Germany has learned
           | nothing from its past.
        
           | throw310822 wrote:
           | This is well known, but isn't this exactly what you ask of a
           | great thinker, to be able to transcend the biases of the
           | culture and provide clarity and guidance? (Though of course
           | at that age is hard to expect much from anyone).
        
           | chmod775 wrote:
           | Berlin perspective: It really doesn't feel that way.
           | Germany's official political stance is very much "pro-Israel"
           | and somewhat intentionally deaf and blind towards what is
           | happening in Palestine (though not completely). Public
           | opinion and discourse is much more nuanced though.
        
         | submeta wrote:
         | Totally disappointing. But coming from Germany, no surprise.
         | German intellectualls and media totally ignore the suffering in
         | Palesine. And fully suppress any solidarity with Palestine. By
         | defunding, by cancelling, by smear campaigns (look up how they
         | --overnight--deligitimised Greta Thunberg), by basically not
         | reporting about what's going on there. And if you are state
         | employed, you can basically bet on it losing your job once you
         | show soliarity with Palestine.
        
           | inglor_cz wrote:
           | Europe also has a non-trivial problem with both Islamic
           | terrorism and cultural clash between indigenous Europeans and
           | newly settled Muslims.
           | 
           | That reduces empathy towards other Muslims quite
           | significantly.
        
             | submeta wrote:
             | Why did muslims have to leave their countries? The
             | "cultural clash" didn't appear out of thin air. Muslims are
             | in Europe in large numbers because of wars that Europe and
             | the West either started, fueled, or failed to prevent.
             | 
             | To name a few conflicts incited by the West: The Nakba in
             | 1948 displaced 750,000 Palestinians and created a refugee
             | population that still hasn't been resolved.
             | 
             | The Soviet-Afghan War displaced 6M+ people.
             | 
             | The US invaded Iraq in 2003, directly creating the vacuum
             | that spawned ISIS.
             | 
             | NATO bombed Libya into a failed state.
             | 
             | The US and Israel spent years destabilizing Syria long
             | before the civil war made it the worst refugee crisis since
             | WWII.
             | 
             | Europe's closest allies armed all sides of Yemen's proxy
             | war.
             | 
             | => Every single wave of Muslim refugees into Europe traces
             | back to a conflict the West had its hands in. Blaming
             | Muslims for being here while ignoring why they had to leave
             | is not a serious position.
             | 
             | And now Iran, a country with 90+m population. And noone
             | stops US/israel. What do you think will cause the next flow
             | of refugees?
        
               | inglor_cz wrote:
               | Most Muslims in Europe are descendants of Gastarbeiters
               | from the 1960s and 1970s.
        
               | submeta wrote:
               | That's only partially true and it conveniently skips the
               | last 15 years.
               | 
               | Yes, Germany's Turkish community largely traces back to
               | Gastarbeiter recruitment in the 1960s/70s.
               | 
               | But since 2010, Germany alone received 850,000 Muslim
               | migrants, with 86% of refugees coming from war zones like
               | Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan.
               | 
               | Between 2013 and 2019, nearly 70% of all refugees in
               | Germany were Muslim. Across Europe, large Muslim
               | communities in Sweden, the Netherlands, and elsewhere
               | originate from Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and ex-
               | Yugoslavia, not from guest worker programs.
               | 
               | The Gastarbeiter framing erases the millions who came
               | because their countries were destroyed by wars the West
               | participated in.
        
               | inglor_cz wrote:
               | Approximately 5,5 million Muslims live in Germany. If
               | about 1 million of these came as refugees, that is still
               | a minority within minority.
               | 
               | "The Gastarbeiter framing erases the millions"
               | 
               | Don't try this newspeak at me. I said quite clearly that
               | majority, not all, European Muslims are descendents of
               | Gastarbeiters.
               | 
               | Or OK, lets use your newspeak. When it comes to framing,
               | your framing of the wars in the Middle East is that they
               | are completely attributable to the West. Do the locals
               | have no agency? Didn't they engage in wars prior to rise
               | of Western power? Is the Shi'a-Sunni split a Western
               | plot? Did Islam spread by completely non-violent means?
               | 
               | Muslims are humans, and as such perfectly capable of
               | waging wars on their own.
        
               | alephnerd wrote:
               | In my opinion, it's not about "Islam" or the "West" -
               | it's about institutional capacity.
               | 
               | In 1990, both Syria and Turkiye were roughly comparable
               | developmentally, with HDIs of 0.563 and 0.598
               | respectively. Yet by 2000, Turkiye's HDI significantly
               | outpaced Syria's (0.669 versus 0.587) _despite_ Turkiye
               | going through severe political, social, and economic
               | turmoil. And by 2010 (the eve of the Arab Spring), this
               | difference in HDI was significantly exacerbated (0.750 in
               | Turkiye versus 0.661 in Syria). Furthermore, both Turkiye
               | and Syria participated in the Gulf War and didn 't
               | participate in the Iraq War.
               | 
               | The _key_ difference was the billions the Assad regime
               | spent on it 's occupation of Lebanon from the 1980s to
               | the 2005 Cedar Revolution, backing the PKK to antagonize
               | Turkiye, and embezzling into slush funds the Assad family
               | now uses to finance their life in exile in Moscow and
               | Dubai. Meanwhile, during the same time period, Turkiye
               | spent similar amounts building a welfare state and
               | investing in expanding the social safety net and
               | investing in infrastructure.
               | 
               | And other Muslim majority countries that were comparable
               | to or significantly less developed than either Turkiye or
               | Syria in 1990 such as Algeria (0.593), Indonesia (0.526),
               | and Iran (0.613) were able to either catch up to Syria by
               | 2010 such as Indonesia with an HDI of 0.667 or outpace it
               | such as Algeria with an HDI of 0.721 and Iran with an HDI
               | of 0.756 _despite_ either starting from a lower base and
               | going through an economic collapse in the 1990s
               | (Indonesia), going through a devastating decade long
               | civil war throughout the entirety of the 1990s (Algeria),
               | or rebuilding after a decade long war and sanctions
               | (Iran)
               | 
               | Even IRAQ, despite starting at a significantly lower base
               | in 1990 (HDI of 0.497) was able to roughly catch up to
               | contemporary Syria by 2010 (with an HDI of 0.629) despite
               | the Gulf War in 1991-92, the sanctions regime, the
               | Kurdish insurgency, the Shia insurgency, the Iraq War,
               | and the subsequent Iraqi Civil War.
               | 
               | Fundamentally, the Assad regime mismanaged Syria, and
               | it's lack of institutions outside of the Army and the
               | Baath Party along with existing social fissures due to
               | Hafez al-Assad's brutal repression of Sunnis in the
               | 1970s-80s meant Syria's collapse was a question of "when"
               | and not "if".
               | 
               | If institutions are robust, development is compounded. If
               | institutions are weak, development slows down and
               | fissures in society grow larger and larger leading to a
               | breaking point.
        
             | fl0id wrote:
             | that has nothing to do with it. you can see the same thing
             | in other conflicts. it's just more convenient to look away.
        
           | ks1723 wrote:
           | This is utter nonsense. I have seen and read many reports and
           | articles about the suffering in Gaza and the West Bank in the
           | mainstream media! And you won't loose your job when
           | expressing solidarity.
        
       | nkurz wrote:
       | "Jurgen Habermas is dead. The philosopher and sociologist died on
       | Saturday in Starnberg at the age of 96."
       | 
       | https://www-spiegel-de.translate.goog/kultur/philosoph-juerg...
        
       | doener wrote:
       | Obituary: https://archive.is/gQ3HB
        
       | jhoho wrote:
       | He regularly wrote essays for "Suddeutsche Zeitung", commenting
       | on the world's political situation. The last one I read was
       | published in November 2025. Sharp as a knive, as always. I'll
       | miss them.
       | 
       | What an accomplished life.
        
       | throwaway260124 wrote:
       | Started his life supporting genocide. Ended his life supporting
       | genocide.
       | 
       | May he learn something in his next life.
        
         | biggestlou wrote:
         | What an absolutely idiotic statement
        
       | bwestergard wrote:
       | Habermas was truly a giant. Regardless of your political outlook,
       | some engagement with his texts is time well spent. For an
       | accessible on-ramp to his work, I recommend:
       | 
       | https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/habermas/#PublSphe
        
       | Xunjin wrote:
       | In a time in which Democracies are being threatened by
       | authoritarians governments, such a loss is a reminder Democracy
       | is not guarantee, you have to fight for it, every single day.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-03-14 23:01 UTC)