[HN Gopher] Lost Doctor Who Episodes Found
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Lost Doctor Who Episodes Found
        
       Author : edent
       Score  : 183 points
       Date   : 2026-03-13 05:18 UTC (17 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.bbc.co.uk)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.bbc.co.uk)
        
       | hoyd wrote:
       | Perhaps the doctor meant for these to be lost and not found, or
       | that the daleks was afraid of them?
        
         | nephihaha wrote:
         | I think Doctor Who was finding its feet in the Hartnell era and
         | it was Troughton who really first defined the character to what
         | he became later.
         | 
         | In the Hartnell era, the Doctor was a grandfather I think,
         | looked old (although Hartnell was much younger than he
         | appeared, thanks to the war etc) and seems to have been human.
        
       | beardyw wrote:
       | I remember wanting to love Dr Who even before it was broadcast.
       | The TARDIS was great, but the first series was disappointing.
       | Like so many others, it was the first sight (and sound) of a
       | Dalek which vindicated my hopes.
        
       | mrlonglong wrote:
       | We have all the voice recordings, feed that into AI along with
       | the extant episodes and it should be able to regenerate (geddit?)
       | the missing episodes.
        
         | waltbosz wrote:
         | Feels a bit like Jurassic Park
        
           | BurningFrog wrote:
           | The risk of the episodes going wild and kill lawyers seems
           | minimal though.
        
             | panzagl wrote:
             | Risk or benefit?
        
             | razingeden wrote:
             | Then what is AI even good for? :(
        
         | benj111 wrote:
         | From a utilitarian pov yes. But that's completely missing the
         | artistic point. Why shoot a film when you could just feed the
         | script into an AI?
        
           | mrlonglong wrote:
           | It could recreate missing episodes using the extant episodes.
           | That's something worthwhile doing until someone finds them.
           | It's not creating a complete new series.
        
             | tracker1 wrote:
             | Even if it's motion comic level animation, it'd still be
             | nice to see combined with the audio recordings.
        
             | Mordisquitos wrote:
             | People want to find the missing episodes because of their
             | historical value as actual human artistic creations, and
             | not because they want to watch a thing that looks like an
             | old missing episode.
             | 
             | There would be as much value in an "AI-recreated" missing
             | episode as there would be in taking the audio of a modern
             | episode and using AI to create a new video track for it.
        
               | zamadatix wrote:
               | > People want to find the missing episodes because...
               | 
               | Speak for yourself!
        
         | skerit wrote:
         | Do we also have stills of all the episodes? Or only audio?
        
           | TetOn wrote:
           | There are production stills that are used like a slide show
           | and combined with the recorded audio. Certain episodes have
           | been reconstructed using animation such that the basic scene
           | blocking and events are played out alongside the recorded
           | audio.
        
         | HughParry wrote:
         | Somebody spent a small fortune trying this a while ago with
         | disliked results
         | https://nypost.com/2025/04/13/entertainment/ailing-doctor-wh...
        
           | zamadatix wrote:
           | They seem to have been pleased with the results:
           | 
           | > "It has to be worth it for the pleasure it's brought me to
           | see them," Levine said. "Doctor Who runs all night in my
           | bedroom, complete, nothing missing."
        
             | HughParry wrote:
             | Ah I mean others disliked the results.
             | 
             | Make up your own mind I suppose, I doubt you will find them
             | rewarding: https://youtu.be/rQabMPpdQnk?si=Fm9Yqj7EwAjYp5np
        
               | zamadatix wrote:
               | Well heck - many don't even like the originals at all :p.
               | On the contrary I found these much more enjoyable than
               | the audio and stills! Of course I'd prefer more of the
               | original copies be found... but for now the AI ones fill
               | the gaps in my collection instead of the audio
               | reconstructions.
        
           | mapontosevenths wrote:
           | They animated a lot of the missing pieces of the missing
           | episode Shada with excellent results. If AI could do
           | something of similar quality that would be wonderful.
        
       | pessimizer wrote:
       | I was afraid this would never happen again. Two very good
       | episodes, too.
       | 
       | I just pray that we'll get to see a few more Troughton episodes.
       | He's the doctor that set the standard that all future doctors
       | followed, yet the least known because the moronic BBC wiped
       | basically his entire run, and now we only have about half of it.
       | 
       | Tom Baker was "my Doctor" because he's the one who made me love
       | the show when I was a kid, but Troughton (and Zoe and Jamie) are
       | my favorite era.
       | 
       | edit: Zoe and Jamie are from way back when the companions were
       | expected to be _useful,_ before Sarah Jane. Zoe was better at
       | math than the Doctor; imagine them doing anything like that now.
        
         | NetMageSCW wrote:
         | Companions are still useful, they just bring different skills
         | to the Doctor (humanity?).
        
           | pessimizer wrote:
           | No, they're cute, neurotic, complain a lot, and fall in love
           | with the Doctor (who is a Great Man with the weight of the
           | universe on his shoulders.) They're all Sarah Jane.
           | 
           | There was the one companion where both elements happened at
           | the same time; the _last_ primarily useful companion, the
           | _first_ companion to be in love with the Doctor: Jo Grant,
           | the UNIT agent with a certificate from an  "Escapeology
           | course," but would look up at the Doctor with puppydog eyes.
           | She had suddenly replaced Liz Shaw, the super-competent UNIT
           | scientist who sometimes seemed like she could barely tolerate
           | him. They made Jo Grant a rookie and a _klutz._
           | 
           | Up to Jo Grant, the companions were _primarily_ there to do
           | things, so the Doctor didn 't have to be _everything_. _Jo
           | Grant_ was the one who would free them when they were tied up
           | and locked in a storeroom; like how Zoe would make fun of how
           | bad the Doctor was at driving the Tardis. Sarah Jane, by
           | contrast, was as helpless as a fetus, constantly complaining,
           | and hopelessly in love.
           | 
           | Leela, Romana, and Adric (although Adric was constantly
           | humiliated, then killed) were still left to come, and Ace
           | allowed the useful companions from the original series to go
           | out with a bang( _sorry_ ), but in Nu Doctor Who it was to be
           | strictly Sarah Janes forever.
           | 
           | People even thought Donna Noble was a breath of fresh air
           | because even though she was useless and constantly
           | complaining, at least she wasn't constantly _simpering and
           | crying_ over him. The absolute nadir of this trend was when
           | Martha Jones, actually a medical doctor(!), was nearly
           | suicidal with lust over him and he was _just not into her at
           | all._ Doesn 't like career women, I guess.
           | 
           |  _It 's not you, Martha, it's me. Now I'm off to haunt a
           | little girl's bedroom and cuck the sweet, perfect boyfriend
           | who would be willing to wait 2,000 years for her. Maybe you
           | should look up Mickey, that other guy whose fiance I stole
           | while I let him ride in the backseat. He's single; I ruined
           | his girl for anyone else._
        
         | hnlmorg wrote:
         | That era of companions was a response to the eras before then
         | when companions were expected to just look pretty and scream on
         | cue.
        
           | pessimizer wrote:
           | No companion was like that until Sarah Jane. All companions
           | were like that after the revival. It was decided by the
           | person behind the revival that they would be women, never any
           | more useful than Teagan, never as obviously hot as Peri but
           | always cute. They would never be a threat to super Doctor and
           | his magic screwdriver, or hot enough to make women angry.
           | 
           | Just sort of a cynical calculation by somebody who thought of
           | women as tasteful accessories.
        
       | MrGinkgo wrote:
       | Film cans? I thought the whole reason the series was missing was
       | because it was shot on video, and then the tapes were wiped after
       | shooting?
        
         | Uvix wrote:
         | Film prints were made for overseas sales.
        
         | mikehall314 wrote:
         | You're correct but as Uvix has said, BBC Enterprises made film
         | copies for overseas sales before the original tapes were
         | erased.
         | 
         | The earliest episode to survive on its original videotape is
         | Ambassadors of Death episode 1 from 1970. None of the original
         | 60s tapes still survive, though I believe there is at least one
         | tape that we know used to have Doctor Who on it but which now
         | has another programme.
         | 
         | The earliest episode to survive in its original medium is
         | possibly The Dalek Invasion of Earth episode 5 (The Waking
         | Ally). That's because, while this was shot on electronic studio
         | cameras as usual, there were no videotape machines available to
         | record.
         | 
         | Instead the output of those cameras was telerecorded straight
         | to 35mm film. AIUI the negative of that telerecording still
         | exists.
        
           | WalterBright wrote:
           | > there is at least one tape that we know used to have Doctor
           | Who on it but which now has another programme.
           | 
           | Recording over another recording does not completely erase
           | the other. I wonder if it could be recovered.
        
             | mikehall314 wrote:
             | It has been suggested numerous times, but the BBC didn't
             | just record over the top - the tapes were erased with a
             | degausser before reuse.
        
               | WalterBright wrote:
               | Oh well.
        
         | gwbas1c wrote:
         | The BBC used a kinescope much longer than the US. (A kinescope
         | recorded TV to film.)
         | 
         | The US pushed a lot harder than Europe for videotape because
         | kinescopes dropped frames off of American 60i frame rates, but
         | worked really well for European 50i frame rates. Thus the BBC
         | continued to use kinescopes for a long time.
        
       | throwawaymobule wrote:
       | It's strange for formerly lost media to get a whole news story
       | about it. This should, but still strange.
       | 
       | Hope more are found sooner than another 13 years from now.
        
         | zahlman wrote:
         | Why should that be strange?
        
         | nephihaha wrote:
         | There are several "holy grails" in British TV history.
         | 
         | Lost Doctor Who episodes are one of them. Dad's Army also has
         | lost black and white episodes (the colour ones have been
         | repeated ad nauseam all my lifetime).
         | 
         | I can think of a few others. Scotch on the Rocks was a
         | political hit piece written by Douglas Hurd showing an armed
         | Scottish uprising along the lines of Northern Ireland. It was
         | supposed to frighten people away from Scottish nationalism, but
         | ended up causing copycat incidents. It vanished shortly after
         | being broadcast probably because of its unintended effects.
         | 
         | The ultimate would be some of the pre-WW2 television
         | broadcasts. Most of these were broadcast in the London area and
         | practically nowhere else. Almost no one had recording equipment
         | back then and they were often broadcast live.
        
           | ahartmetz wrote:
           | I just wanted to mention at this opportunity that some
           | British TV series from the late 70s, early 80s are absolutely
           | brilliant and some of the best stuff I have ever watched.
           | Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, Smiley's People, Danger UXB,
           | Sandbaggers and Sherlock Holmes are some of my favorites.
        
             | nephihaha wrote:
             | Sherlock Holmes is great. Tinker Tailor was repeated
             | through my childhood, so I saw it a few too many times. I
             | watched it again recently and found it slow... However the
             | cast of it and Smiley's People are great. Karla is a
             | notable early appearance of Patrick Stewart.
             | 
             | There were some great period dramas at the time, if a
             | little set bound (like I, Claudius)
        
             | buredoranna wrote:
             | I grew up with Jeremy Brett's Sherlock Holmes, by far, in
             | my opinion, the most accurate representation of the
             | stories.
             | 
             | Only in my adult life did I read the stories, finding large
             | chunks of the dialog in the TV show being word for word
             | taken from the stories. And when not word for word, the
             | tone and feel of the scenes so well portrayed on screen.
        
           | UncleSlacky wrote:
           | > the pre-WW2 television broadcasts. Most of these were
           | broadcast in the London area and practically nowhere else.
           | Almost no one had recording equipment back then and they were
           | often broadcast live.
           | 
           | The "Phonovision" recordings made by Baird (which were
           | unplayable at the time) have been recovered:
           | 
           | http://www.tvdawn.com/earliest-tv/
        
         | m463 wrote:
         | I think there's LOTS of media out there, but there doesn't seem
         | to be easy ways to convert it.
         | 
         | There was probably a renaissance period when conversion
         | equipment was being actively developed and available, but that
         | time is probably gone. For example I think a good film scanner
         | would be the Nikon Super Coolscan 8000 ED, but current state of
         | the art falls far short. For film, vcr tapes and more we should
         | be doing so much better.
         | 
         | I have old family super-8 films that are kind of convertible,
         | but not the magnetic sound strip.
        
           | schlauerfox wrote:
           | If you have something precious on home movie film, this lab
           | in Burbank, CA that does a lot of the movies will have
           | sometimes deals on film transfers for holidays, or you can
           | call them for a quote. No relationship, but I did have some
           | done and they were very good. https://www.pro8mm.com/
        
           | AussieWog93 wrote:
           | Wait, what's wrong with Cintel? I've not used it myself but
           | got a really good impression back when I worked at BMD a few
           | years back.
        
         | stronglikedan wrote:
         | > still strange
         | 
         | wrong doctor
        
       | haunter wrote:
       | There are a lot of known lost episodes out there that collectors
       | saved from thrash. The BBC knows it, everyone knows it, but the
       | collectors won't come forward because they are afraid they are
       | going to be prosecuted. They basically stole property which was
       | meant to be destroyed.
       | 
       | https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2023/nov/11/lost-do...
        
         | zdw wrote:
         | The cost to make a digital copy from film stock has gone way
         | down, to the point that fan groups [1][2] frequently encode and
         | clean up old copies of film:
         | 
         | [1]: https://www.thestarwarstrilogy.com/project-4k77/ [2]:
         | https://www.youtube.com/c/kinekovideo
         | 
         | This of course has various IP implications...
        
         | zedlasso wrote:
         | I remember when Eccleston's version came out and all the nerd
         | blogs were crying cause this means these episodes were never
         | gonna be released.
         | 
         | You are so right.They are never gonna be released.
        
           | mapontosevenths wrote:
           | The original... takers of these films are dying off. It's
           | well known that many episodes exist within private
           | collections. The prevailing belief in the fandom is that they
           | will be get released as the owners pass away. Indeed, that's
           | likely where these two came from.
        
         | hsbauauvhabzb wrote:
         | I would have thought there would be parties willing to
         | anonymously rip and upload any such materials?
        
         | why_at wrote:
         | I don't really understand, it seems like if this was the main
         | thing preventing people from returning them there would be ways
         | around it. Couldn't they return them anonymously or upload them
         | to the internet or something?
        
           | glouwbug wrote:
           | I mean, at that point you're distributing piracy, no?
        
             | RealityVoid wrote:
             | Arrrr! Aye aye maitey'tis a heavy toll, but the prize be
             | worth the parley
        
       | mapontosevenths wrote:
       | "My flabber has never been so gasted." - Pete Purves
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-03-13 23:00 UTC)