[HN Gopher] The Bovadium Fragments: Together with The Origin of ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Bovadium Fragments: Together with The Origin of Bovadium
        
       Author : freediver
       Score  : 40 points
       Date   : 2026-03-08 18:09 UTC (5 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (kirkcenter.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (kirkcenter.org)
        
       | mplanchard wrote:
       | Wow what a treat, previously unreleased tolkien satire on one of
       | my own hobby-horses. Put in an order with my local bookstore, so
       | excited to read this!
        
       | seanhunter wrote:
       | It's fair to say that after all the descriptions of the shire vs
       | isengard etc in the LoTR, his position on mechanization and cars
       | isn't very surprising, but it's quite extraordinary for this to
       | show up.
        
       | reillyse wrote:
       | Tolkien really was a serious reactionary.
       | 
       | I'm not a fan of cars or environmental damage but the idyll that
       | he puts on a pedestal just didn't exist for the vast majority of
       | humans in Britain (let alone elsewhere in the world)
        
         | shrubble wrote:
         | The Cotswolds documented at their tail end (ended by the
         | motorcycle and car) by Laurie Lee in "Cider With Rosie" had
         | about the same existence for centuries.
        
           | reillyse wrote:
           | I would push back on that concept a bit. I think if you lived
           | in the Cotswolds in say 1920 you would be agog with the pace
           | of change. Bicycles, industry, exploration the world even
           | literacy. Everything around you was changing and the idea
           | that this place was unchanged is simply not true.
           | 
           | Somebody in 1820 might not be able to read but by 1920
           | literacy had hit 96-97% (numbers for the UK in general),
           | books became far more common etc etc
           | 
           | Change is the only constant.
        
       | ecshafer wrote:
       | Tolkien continues to be quite prescient then. The Automobile has
       | been an unmitigated disaster for mankind, the environment, and
       | society. It destroys the environment, it makes cities less
       | pleasant to live in, it kills people, it causes extra friction to
       | social interactions that damages social bonds.
        
         | ahazred8ta wrote:
         | > _The Automobile makes cities less pleasant to live in_
         | 
         | In 1900, there was a major manure crisis in all large european
         | and north american cities. The swarms of flies were
         | inescapable.
         | 
         | Although certainly the new roads required by increased
         | population caused disruption.
        
       | GMoromisato wrote:
       | Tolkien was probably right in that he would have hated to live in
       | 2026. We are literally building machines designed to replace
       | people like him.
       | 
       | And yet, I can't help thinking that I would hate to live in
       | Tolkien's time. When I was around 10, in 1975, I built a giant
       | computer out of a cardboard box. To me, a computer was the same
       | as a spaceship--something I would never own. Then in 1978, I saw
       | an ad for a TRS-80 personal computer, and my world flipped.
       | 
       | Even now, in my 60s, I can't wait to sit down and start
       | programming (with or without AI). I've had a long, fruitful, and
       | extremely fun career with computers, and I can't imagine what I
       | would have done without them.
       | 
       | Does that mean it's all relative? Whatever we're used to, that's
       | what's good and any change is monstrous? Or is there really such
       | a thing as progress and degeneration? Is it possible to say our
       | time is better or worse than Tolkien's in some absolute sense?
       | 
       | I don't know. I think if you take a Rawlsian perspective, and
       | imagine being a random person of the era, I think being born
       | today is far preferable to being born in 1892. On every measure--
       | childhood poverty, violent deaths, even air quality--2026 is
       | better than 1892.
       | 
       | And that improvement is due almost entirely to technology--to the
       | machine.
        
         | gexla wrote:
         | One of my favorite movies as a kid was Explorers (1985) where
         | kids built a spaceship from a Tilt-A-Whirl and other parts. It
         | was an inspiration. Like you, I enjoy programming, but I
         | haven't built a spaceship yet. Hehe
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explorers_(film)
        
           | switchbak wrote:
           | That movie was really incredible, right up until the part
           | where they ran out of money making it and it took a right
           | hand turn into being absolutely terrible.
           | 
           | When I was young I only saw the first half. Decades later I
           | got to finish it ... what a letdown after all this time.
        
         | xyzzy_plugh wrote:
         | I heartily agree with you except for the ongoing childhood-
         | screentime pandemic where kids aren't going outside to play,
         | but instead are staying inside, alone, and _maybe_ playing with
         | others virtually, but with more exposure to harm (e.g.
         | gambling). This is clearly going to cause some serious long
         | term generational fallout.
        
           | GMoromisato wrote:
           | Agreed--we're already seeing some of that, and I fully
           | support minimizing kids' exposure to that.
           | 
           | I probably should have been explicit that I don't think
           | technology has no downsides--it most certainly does. It's
           | just, IMHO, the benefits outweigh the risks. And, over time,
           | we figure out how to ameliorate the downsides.
        
         | gjsman-1000 wrote:
         | > and I can't imagine what I would have done without them.
         | 
         | You're falling into the trap of saying _I could 've only been
         | happy if I did X._ But humans aren't like that - even
         | garbagemen find happiness in their work. The brain adapts to
         | baseline no matter the field.
         | 
         | The second trap you're falling into is saying _look how
         | abundant things are compared to 1892._ We have every statistic
         | proven and locked down that abundance does not equal happiness.
        
           | WillAdams wrote:
           | Ages ago, I used to draw using pencils and having to ink
           | drawings and then once 3 views were done, do all the work to
           | make a 3D rendering --- while I appreciate Marshall
           | MacLuhan's warnings concerning each technological advancement
           | resulting in a matching amputation, the freedom and
           | expressiveness which modern CAD affords is nothing short of
           | miraculous --- it was pretty rare for there to be a draftsman
           | whose artistic sensibilities allowed them to escape from the
           | overnight drafting shift to making their own designs.
        
           | card_zero wrote:
           | But happiness wasn't mentioned. There was "fun", "I can't
           | imagine what I would have done without them", and
           | "preferable". If happiness is not the goal, your point about
           | being _happy_ with garbage is irrelevant.
        
           | GMoromisato wrote:
           | Do you believe that all work is equivalent? That no matter
           | what job I chose, I would be equally happy? That is hard for
           | me to believe.
           | 
           | Do you believe that, on balance, the world is no better today
           | than in 1892? If so, that's where we disagree.
        
             | gjsman-1000 wrote:
             | > Do you believe that, on balance, the world is no better
             | today than in 1892? If so, that's where we disagree.
             | 
             | I think that the floor has been raised and the ceiling has
             | been lowered for the typical person. There's far less
             | suffering, but absence of suffering is not the same as
             | happiness. In that respect I think a random 1892 person may
             | have actually been happier. South Korea has 30x more
             | suicides than Syria; the UK more than 3x Sudan; France more
             | than 4x Afghanistan.
        
               | readthenotes1 wrote:
               | The lowered ceiling is much more within the agency of a
               | person now than in 1892. That we are not is far more of a
               | choice for most people now that so many more have food
               | and shelter security, not to mention antibiotics.
        
           | IAmBroom wrote:
           | > even garbagemen find happiness in their work.
           | 
           | Citation definitely needed.
           | 
           | The ones I know find happiness in their relatively high pay
           | for an 8hr/day, no GED-required job, with the job security
           | that the first few days are blindingly difficult for anyone
           | to adapt to, even highly fit college athletes (source: 40+
           | garbageman whose son couldn't hack two days of it).
        
         | kazinator wrote:
         | > _When I was around 10, in 1975, I built a giant computer out
         | of a cardboard box._
         | 
         | In around 1976, when I was five, I followed a smaller design:
         | mine fit entirely inside an egg carton, with the tops painted
         | various colors representing buttons. I had a roll of punched
         | paper tape as a souvenir from my aunt, who worked in accounting
         | for textile company. I fed that tape into the egg carton as
         | input.
         | 
         | And so here we are ...
        
       | johngossman wrote:
       | Tolkien and Lewis came by their luddism fairly, having both
       | survived the horrors of trench warfare.
        
       | carlosneves wrote:
       | This concept of "machine worship" reminds me of E. M. Forster's
       | The Machine Stops.
       | 
       | Is it possible for a tech-oriented ideal to escape "machine
       | worship"?
       | 
       | As we strive to refine our "machines" ever further, and our
       | "machines" become ever more capable, where does that lead us?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2026-03-13 23:01 UTC)