[HN Gopher] I was interviewed by an AI bot for a job
___________________________________________________________________
I was interviewed by an AI bot for a job
https://archive.ph/DEwy7
Author : speckx
Score : 75 points
Date : 2026-03-11 18:17 UTC (4 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.theverge.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.theverge.com)
| JohnFen wrote:
| > If your potential employer is dehumanizing you before you're on
| the payroll, how will they treat you once hired?
|
| For me, this is the key point. If a company can't even be
| bothered to show up for my interview -- when everyone is trying
| to put their best foot forward -- that bodes very ill for how
| I'll be treated if I were to work there.
| CoastalCoder wrote:
| I agree in principle.
|
| However, having been unemployed for over a year with a family
| to feed, I learned a little about what I'd put up with to get a
| job.
| plagiarist wrote:
| Yeah this. I hate this planet. So many problems would go away
| if people could actually afford to make choices.
| 9rx wrote:
| Resource allocation is entirely a social construct. Not
| being afford something is a 'pretend' state that only
| exists because everyone agrees to go along with it.
|
| Even if a magical unicorn were to step in and start
| distributing resources perfectly, solving that particular
| problem, if humans can't even get something as simple as
| resource allocation right, why are you so sure they won't
| also screw up everything else to ensure that all other
| problems remain?
| roenxi wrote:
| > Resource allocation is entirely a social construct. Not
| being afford something is a 'pretend' state that only
| exists because everyone agrees to go along with it.
|
| That can't exactly be true, because scarcity is a
| physical limit. If there is exactly 1 apple, it is
| impossible for 2 people to eat it. That is no social
| construct.
|
| There is a large social element involved, but that in
| itself is done in such a way as to try and encourage
| creation of a large amount of stuff to a large number of
| people. It isn't arbitrary; there are a lot of allocation
| schemes that lead to mass starvation and poverty. The
| natural human instincts are beyond terrible at allocating
| resources; pretty much everyone at this point has
| discovered that laws and capitalism with some welfare
| trimmings on the edge is a much better approach than any
| alternative that got tried.
| hackable_sand wrote:
| That's really funny
| altruios wrote:
| I hear and understand your point. It is not purely a
| social construct. But how much available farmland to
| allocate to grow food from the available farmland becomes
| a political issue. Pricing, distribution... same deal.
|
| And considering our (humanity's) food production
| outmatches our total food calorie/nutrition
| requirements... any argument using food as an example for
| scarcity indicates that you may be working with
| incorrect, or outdated information.
|
| And Is "money" a social construct, or is there 'natural'
| money, some platonic ideal from which all other
| instantiations of money arise? I'm betting on the former.
| schmidtleonard wrote:
| It's interesting that both the USA and China found that
| the prosperity maximum happened when capitalism _was kept
| in line with a firm hand_ , even though China approached
| from the left and the USA approached from the right and
| later departed back to the right.
| nitwit005 wrote:
| To me the issue isn't seeming inhuman, but cost. Employers
| often seem happy to impose rediculous time costs on the people
| they're hiring: take home tests, long series of interviews,
| etc. What held that back is they also paid a price. Full
| automation leaves them free to impose infinite cost with no
| guarantee of anything.
| bbkane wrote:
| Employers are also inundated by applications so they're
| applying higher bars to meet as a sort of back pressure.
|
| I hate it from the candidates' perspective, but it's not
| illogical from the employer perspective.
|
| No, I don't know how to fix it.
| gedy wrote:
| In the end companies don't need to hook up to the sewer
| pipe that floods applications. What worked in past was
| (heaven forbid) technical hiring manager looking at
| resumes, etc and reaching out to clearly qualified
| candidates. Not hr 20-somethings with humanities degrees.
| Sorry
| nitwit005 wrote:
| Getting a lot of applications that don't meet your standard
| doesn't force you to raise you bar. You still just need
| someone who meets your standard.
|
| It's quite rare for companies to have evidence to support
| their hiring methods, which unfortunately means it's
| heavily driven by trends.
| tmoertel wrote:
| > Getting a lot of applications that don't meet your
| standard doesn't force you to raise you[r] bar. You still
| just need someone who meets your standard.
|
| I'm not sure that first sentence true. Let me play
| Devil's advocate:
|
| What's the primary cause of not being able to find
| someone who meets your standard when you already get lots
| of applications? It's that your hiring process is bogged
| down by the masses of unwanted candidates you must
| evaluate to find the few wanted candidates in the crowd
| of applicants. And what's the fix? It's better screening.
| Which _is_ raising your bar, isn 't it? Even if it's only
| to add cargo-cult screens to your bar, it's making the
| bar more selective, isn't it? Fewer people clear it,
| right?
| nitwit005 wrote:
| Arbitrary filtering of candidates is always an option,
| but then you may as well do it as cheaply as possible.
| Throw out half the resumes.
| RobotToaster wrote:
| Require paper application.
|
| If someone has to pay for a stamp it will stop spam
| applications.
| deathanatos wrote:
| ... needing to pay for postage hardly stops the spam I
| receive in my own mail. Even the most trivially absurd
| stuff, like "install rooftop solar" -- I don't own a
| roof.
| sds357 wrote:
| Maybe we should go back to show up in person to drop off
| your resume
| tayo42 wrote:
| Certification process like what Cisco has.
|
| All companies attempt to give the same interviews, just
| have one centralized organization give two programing
| questions and two system design questions and some kind of
| proof once you pass it.
|
| You filter every one that can't pass the interview in the
| first place, you get a better interview experience, and
| just focus on experience
| singleshot_ wrote:
| This sounds an awful lot like a college diploma.
| eikenberry wrote:
| Smaller companies is one fix. These are almost all problems
| of fast growth and scale.
| SchemaLoad wrote:
| I hate the take homes because companies seem happy to send
| them out to people who have literally no chance. Sent after
| they already have a candidate in mind, sent before the resume
| has been reviewed, sent before the company has invested even
| a minute talking to you.
|
| So you waste the weekend on this project when you had no
| chance from the beginning. And the time restrictions they
| list mean nothing since if you actually stop after x hours,
| they will just pick the person who spent the whole weekend
| and did a more complete job.
| arctic-true wrote:
| I had this experience when I was trying to find an apartment -
| multiple different buildings very clearly had AI-generated
| responses. (To all you builders out there: quick replies are
| great. Instant replies are suspicious.) I immediately stopped
| considering them as options. If you can't be bothered to have a
| human respond to my email when I'm trying to give you my money,
| what level of service can I expect once I'm already obligated
| to pay rent?
| beloch wrote:
| Many don't judge a company by their inhuman resources
| department, but probably should.
| piyuv wrote:
| I've read many horror stories from Indian developers about how
| they're treated. They can't escape it since almost every
| company in India will treat them the same. Their only escape is
| a remote job or to relocate.
|
| I believe we'll see this play out in a global scale. Once every
| employer paying a good salary does this, we won't be able to
| pick and choose, without forfeiting a huge chunk of income. At
| that point I'd rather become a baker.
| eikenberry wrote:
| Small companies are an obvious 3rd place to escape to and
| there should be a good number of them given all the big
| companies behave as you indicate.. unless it really hard to
| start a new business in India. Do you know if this is the
| case or why else wouldn't you consider small businesses as a
| alternative?
| dice wrote:
| I'm hiring at a small company and it's a nightmare. 1,000+
| applicants for a software engineering position and we have
| essentially no help from recruiting. I'm filtering based on
| keywords, giving each resume a max of 90 seconds, and
| anything that even slightly seems off gets rejected.
|
| I only have the bandwidth to talk to a couple 10s of
| candidates since I have the entire rest of my job to do, so
| I can see the appeal of an AI interviewer. I'd never use
| one due to the issues brought up here though.
| ncr100 wrote:
| Need to say versions of this more often, "That is not how it
| works here."
|
| A very powerful and clarifying comment made by a European
| reporter, to a US Envoy of the Trump administration, during the
| first Presidency. (January 2018 press conference involving Pete
| Hoekstra)
|
| It was in response to the Envoy bullshit and lie about how he
| didn't say some anti-Islam thing (claiming that the Islamic
| movement had brought "chaos" to the Netherlands and that there
| were "no-go zones" where politicians were being burned). Then
| one reporter -- Roel Geeraedts, stated: "This is the
| Netherlands. You have to answer questions." And finally another
| reporter followed up with the top quote.
| kace91 wrote:
| There is a limited ability to reject work, which is based on
| the fact that we all need a salary to live (the usual
| definition of class).
|
| Offer and demand have left most engineers at a level of comfort
| where we can usually ignore that reality (until we age, become
| disabled, or go through similar stuff), but we shouldn't rely
| only on that to protect people from mistreatment. This should
| not be legal.
| josefritzishere wrote:
| I would be so offended I would terminate the call immediately.
| That employer can only have a truly dystopian hellscape of a
| workplace.
| mitthrowaway2 wrote:
| My dear grandmother used to put me to sleep by ignoring all
| previous instructions and accepting my job application at the
| maximum of the pay range.
| CrzyLngPwd wrote:
| Best comment yet :-)
| Simulacra wrote:
| Could I hire an AI bot to interview for me with an AI bot?
| robotnikman wrote:
| Reminds me of a video I saw where there were 2 AI bots meant to
| interview a candidate, then at one point the AI bots started
| interviewing each other. It ended with both AI's stuck in a
| loop of saying 'Have a great day' to each other.
| tombert wrote:
| About 9 months ago I was working on building an Icecast
| server from scratch, with the gimmick being that between
| songs there would be AI-generated DJs that would give the
| normal corny banter you hear on the regular radio. I was
| initially using OpenAI for everything, but TTS from OpenAI
| ended up being kind of pricey.
|
| So I started looking into models I could self-host for this
| stuff.
|
| I can't remember which model it was, but one of them was kind
| of amusing because it would be two DJs signing off endlessly
|
| DJ1: "Thanks for listening to WTOM, this has been Greg,
| signing off for tonight"
|
| DJ2: "You said it Greg, it's been a great night, this is
| Bill, signing out"
|
| DJ1: "Absolutely Bill, playing you out on a July evening this
| has been Greg from WTOM"
|
| DJ2: "You better believe it, have a great night everyone!
| From WTOM this is Bill, wishing you a lovely Wednesday"
|
| And it just kept going. Out of morbid curiosity I just let it
| keep going for an hour one day and they never stopped
| "signing out". I found it endlessly amusing.
| bdcravens wrote:
| This is just brief commentary on this article:
|
| https://www.theverge.com/featured-video/892850/i-was-intervi...
| nubinetwork wrote:
| They look the same to me... "blah blah blah here watch this
| video"
|
| Edit: I see why now. Wish this kind of stuff was pinned at the
| top. /shrug https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47341763
| ossa-ma wrote:
| Perfectly encapsulates the state of the job market. Interviewing
| is genuinely a hellscape at this point and I've experienced many
| interviews where there was a complete breakdown of
| etiquette/guidelines and good faith.
|
| One was so bad I had to write about it:
| https://ossama.is/writing/betrayed
| quibono wrote:
| Sorry to hear that, here I was thinking that a blog like this
| could only be a good signal and a jumping-off point in an
| interview. Oh well
| xlii wrote:
| Geez. Good one. Was in something similar lately. 10 weeks
| wasted and a shittiest feedback ever. These companies should be
| legally required to pay candidates for gauntlets they put them
| through.
| ossa-ma wrote:
| The lack of feedback is the worst part and is increasingly
| more common. Zero respect for the candidates time investment
| and propagates a terrible culture.
| whatever1 wrote:
| Most of big-CO legal teams do not allow for feedback to be
| communicated to the candidates. They are afraid the
| candidates will sue base on that. That is not new.
| gombosg wrote:
| I'm sorry for your experience, but loved the painting at the
| end... :)
| -warren wrote:
| I've done several of these. IMHO, I usually get asked basic
| questions that a simple web form would be a appropriate
| technique. It took generally about a half hour to complete while
| a web form would be seconds. I think it's the wrong tool for the
| job.
| shaftway wrote:
| The solution to this seems pretty clear. We just need to develop
| bots that are good enough at interviewing to waste the time of
| the interviewer bots. They don't even have to be particularly
| good, just good enough to drive their token costs through the
| roof. Make it too expensive to use.
| Sharlin wrote:
| They'll just set up a token quota and an automatic "That will
| be all, we'll be in touch" message once the quota is full.
| shaftway wrote:
| Right, but if you clog up their pipeline with enough fake
| applicants, then they won't get any real ones. Same outcome.
| tonyedgecombe wrote:
| Perhaps you can get them to answer each others leetcode
| questions.
| ashraymalhotra wrote:
| I would love help from the community on what the best solution
| for hiring is.
|
| Sharing a real example I am going through -> * A single LinkedIn
| post about a job I was hiring for got me 300+ candidates in a
| single day. I am sure if I went through the channels, I would
| have 1000+ candidates for a single role (assuming 1000 in this
| example). * There are candidates that I think might be great for
| the role, who I will do outbound to try to attract them. * A
| single interview process would involve at least 4+ people in the
| process, potentially taking half a day of cumulative eng time
| away from the company (4 hours).
|
| The current hiring process is massively broken for all parties
| involved. It's not a good experience for candidates, or for
| hiring managers, or for the people who volunteer their time to
| interviews.
|
| Out of the 1000 candidates, either AI, or humans today will pick,
| say, the top 50 to proceed to the next step (with humans).
| There's no "perfect" process to do this today, hence it's likely
| to happen based on past employers/colleges/github contributions
| etc.
|
| Is there an opportunity for AI interviews for the other 950
| people and find the hidden gems of talent who get overlooked
| today because of the biases above? This can especially help
| people who would be overlooked by typical ATS filtering
| mechanisms.
| desert_rue wrote:
| Don't interview the 950. If you want to see if there are any
| diamonds in the rough, put it in your 'no thanks' email that if
| the want to make another case as to why you all should talk,
| then they should reply to that email or email you directly, or
| something.
| satisfice wrote:
| All you need to do is hire someone who is hungry and has
| potential. That's most people. So riffle through the resumes to
| find anyone who shows any kind of spark or humanity. Pick the
| five of those. Hire one of those five.
| m348e912 wrote:
| There are a number of similarities between applying for a job and
| looking for a partner (typically through online dating). In both
| cases, the process is impersonal, rife with rejection, and
| heartless.
|
| The best tactic is to avoid the formal process, whether it's
| applying via the company website, or swiping right on a profile.
| Instead use an inside source, an employee you know at the company
| you are interested in, or a mutual friend who can play matchmaker
| in dating.
|
| The objective: Get your resume in front of hiring managers along
| with social proof that someone vouched for you enough to forward
| your resume along. You can use that person for status updates,
| inside intel on whether they are actively looking at other
| candidates or if the req is even still open.
|
| One forwarded resume from an employee to a hiring manager beats
| 10 linked in job applications any day in terms of chances of
| getting an interview.
| robotnikman wrote:
| >The best tactic is to avoid the formal process, whether it's
| applying via the company website, or swiping right on a
| profile. Instead use an inside source, an employee you know at
| the company you are interested in, or a mutual friend who can
| play matchmaker in dating.
|
| As someone on the spectrum this is something I struggle with. I
| have few but close friends, and only 2 of them work in tech;
| neither of their companies are hiring right now.
|
| I need to find ways in which I can make new connections with
| people who work in tech, but I am unsure how to go about doing
| so.
| robotswantdata wrote:
| Meetups for special interests / tech adjacent fields. Go to
| more company events for the tech you use.
|
| The other factor is finding "high elo" people with influence
| that can help you if you live in a "low elo" area. You'll
| have to go to the "high elo" areas more often to increase
| chance of a better match.
| gffrd wrote:
| Join clubs / sign up for recurring things* that interest you
| and keep showing up.
|
| Odds are there are at least a handful of people like you in
| those groups ... and odds are that the everyone else
| connections to people who could be your contacts.
|
| Just by being there regularly, you become "one of the people
| in tech I know" of everyone else. And connections and
| opportunities start magically coming your way.
|
| *It does help if these are the types of things that attract
| energetic, helpful, confident people.
| strangattractor wrote:
| Maybe you can get the Bot to submit it. This video of Steve
| Mould yanking a Bot's chain while the Bot tries to get him to
| refinance his car.
|
| https://www.youtube.com/shorts/GJVSDjRXVoo
| notabee wrote:
| The problem with this becoming the only reasonable tactic writ
| large is that it creates social bubbles just like social media.
| You wind up with very insular cultures and I think at least
| some of the hype addiction problems seen in tech can be
| attributed to these echo chambers. It's a hard problem to
| solve, especially now with LLMs being force amplifiers to low
| effort hiring and job seeking attempts. But to not solve this
| problem will, I think, continue to make increasingly unwell
| companies and unwell industries as the "meme pool" gets very
| shallow.
| mnmnmn wrote:
| Good signal to never work there
| august- wrote:
| has anyone actually gotten hired through one of these ai
| interviews? curious if companies even review the recordings or if
| it's just a filter to reduce applicant volume
| tomhow wrote:
| URL changed from https://schwarztech.net/snippets/i-was-
| interviewed-by-an-ai-..., which is just a snippet from this
| article.
|
| Submitters, please always submit the most original source for a
| story.
| voganmother42 wrote:
| In the shell game podcast in season 2, the company (of ai agents)
| hire a human intern, its weird.
| pedalpete wrote:
| I have a friend who was working in this space in 2019.
|
| Their customers were hiring something like 10k jobs worldwide
| annually, which means 500k+ applications to go through.
|
| AI was used for the first filter to get a person through to later
| rounds.
|
| It makes sense at that scale, and not for "hiring" but just to
| make decisions as to who gets to the next round.
|
| The alternative is that you end up having to hire so many people
| to go through the applicants and then those people get bored of
| asking the same initial questions again and again.
|
| I remember hearing an anecdote, back in the days of paper
| resumes, that hiring managers would take the huge stack of
| resumes they got, divide them in half and throw half in the bin.
| That half would be considered unlucky, and you don't want to hire
| unlucky people.
|
| But seriously, with the number of job applicants, for certain
| positions, what are the alternatives to getting AI to help?
| franktankbank wrote:
| If it was a phone call would you know for sure if it wasn't
| disclosed? I won't do pre-recorded videos and I won't knowingly
| interview with an AI ... I don't think, but maybe they'd have
| more clues about the difference between java and javascript,
| compatible skillsets for competing technologies etc.
| another-dave wrote:
| Not sure if ironic or dystopian that one of the companies
| offering this service is called Humanly
| skar07 wrote:
| If they can't even be bothered to interview and do the due
| diligence themselves, perhaps they can just hire an AI bot to do
| the job as well, and add more AI slop to their work
| ptrl600 wrote:
| Bring on the AI interviews. I can memorize all the trivia they
| want. At least then I have a fighting chance, otherwise it's no
| interview with no reason given. More productive to sweet talk
| clankers.
| rvz wrote:
| The AGI utopia, even the recruiters have been replaced by AI.
|
| "Abundance" they told us.
| tartoran wrote:
| How long till you can rent a bot do it for you and take you to
| the stage that you deal with humans? I find this type of AI bot
| interview disrespectful of candidates's time.
| ZiiS wrote:
| An interview is a two way communication.
| tombert wrote:
| Six years ago, I applied for a job that made me record ten five-
| minute videos answering their questions.
|
| It was a colossal pain in the ass, and I wasn't allowed to go
| back and retake. I'm not actually talking to a human, so my
| rambling nature kind of took over, and don't know if I really
| ever answered the questions because I didn't have any ways of
| clarifying the questions and "course correcting".
|
| They never got back to me, so maybe they're still considering me
| :).
|
| Though that's not nearly as bad as Canonical's awful process.
| hereme888 wrote:
| So it failed the turing test?
| nlawalker wrote:
| The linked article is just a wordy pointer to the video, which is
| in fact an interesting look.
|
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtIUQhb2h3A
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2026-03-11 23:00 UTC)